All great points, thank you.
For the sake of the sake though... if one knew they were keeping a watch how does resale factor into it, I still can't see it but maybe I am missing something?
Moving beyond only money and into design & aesthetics: arguably people "alter" their single most expensive "investment" daily no? That of course being their house ~ add-ons, teardowns, paint, remodels, landscaping decisions and more. A watch is nothing by comparison - or at least an Omega Railmaster - cost wise.
Even more so, if a human knows they're keeping something (in the case of a house, staying there until the Black Wall greets them) they go even deeper into making it their own... as such, not sure why then it is generally viewed as sacrilege when it comes to a watch ~ something that typically falls far below the cost of a house or another spendy yet occasionally altered purchase, cars.
As to other assertions: for me, this isn't "second guessing" Omega. No, it's me taking something nearly perfect and attempting to help it cross the finish line. Let us not forget, not a single original Railmaster in any shop in the year 1957 had this hue for its lume. In essence, I am taking a beast of watch (meant in the best way: the materials and movement are so much better than what Omega had at their disposal in 1957) and visually returning it back to whence forth it first came.
Said differently, and maybe it's only me, fauxtina for me is like buying high end, acid washed, pre-ripped, denim pants or a jacket. No thank you, I want me, and my usage/my daily life, to age the product.
So am I second guessing Omega? Perhaps I am or am not but - again for me, only me - having a beautifully made, robust, spendy watch on my wrist from my favorite brand AND being told it has to look somewhat pre-aged or weathered or pre-owned is cheapening the philosophical aesthetic for me.
Again, caveat, these are only my, MY, opinions so no need for anyone to go Full Warpath on my ass.
Moving on... the implication that this would somehow "Franken Watch" my Railmaster: Really? Come on.
I wouldn't be having my Great Aunt Ethel relume the hands and dial with her favorite nail polish for fυck's sake. It's not like I'm having the Omega script or Greek symbol painted over in high viz lime green paint and substituting in "Rolex" & "Milgauss" to pull the wool. I'm not considering a Monster energy drink logo on the dial.
Not taking the time to locate the thread but a day or two ago, when I was still weighing all this in my mind, I stumbled across a thread here at OF whereby a fellow member was slowly morphing his Speedmaster into, can't quite recall, an Ed White or something more rare than what he had... he had begun the transformation with a new handset and was, again if memory serves, contemplating a new dial at some point down the road, and by in large the response was 100% encouragement so I don't get how lume, which in and of itself is removable, on two hands and 12 triangular minute plots is akin to me pushing a heroin needle into my arm or turning to a life a crime or absolutely destroying a beautiful, and beautifully made, Swiss watch.
As far as pissing off Omega and running into servicing issues if I do decide to move forward... well,
@Archer (since you brought it up) that's where you'd come into play as my watchmaker of choice for a service, no?
😉
Anyway, I'll await more input from you folks but it might already be a moot point as I just heard back from a very talented watchmaker whom I reached out to as a candidate to undertake this project, and he replied with the following bit of bad news:
"Scott,
Glad to hear from an Omega Fan versus the usual Rolex crowd. Also glad someone else out there finds Omega's faux patina as annoying as I do. You aren't the first but you are rare.
Sad to report I will not undertake this otherwise rather simple project because a simple "paint over" leaves too much height and worse, a brownish under hue beneath the new lume (trust me I've tried). And removing the lume on a newer watch is going into a place that concerns me when the watch isn't mine as I don't fully know or understand what Omega is using these days for acrylic binders with their pigments but I do know this, it is very hard."
So there ya go, it might be staying faux-aged after all.