- Posts
- 6
- Likes
- 0
ifbywhiskey
·Hi all,
I am about to purchase my very first vintage Omega and would appreciate your guidance. I've wanted a vintage Seamaster with a solid gold case for a while, specifically a no-date model from the 60s. I unfortunately lost out on a Ref. 165.001 in superb condition. However, recently I found a Ref. 14765 SC-61 in similarly excellent condition, and I plan to pick it up. Before I do, is there any reason why I should hold out for a Ref. 165.001?
To my understanding, the models are practically identical. Technically, I believe that the Ref. 14765 falls under the "Seamaster DeVille" line. There are a few, very minor aesthetic differences between the two models, but the overall appearance and the movement are the same.
As an aside, what would you consider a fair price for a 1960s vintage Seamaster in excellent condition? 18k gold case, including gold caseback with seahorse medallion. I see them in the $2-3k range fairly frequently and was curious if that is inflated or not.
Thank you!
I am about to purchase my very first vintage Omega and would appreciate your guidance. I've wanted a vintage Seamaster with a solid gold case for a while, specifically a no-date model from the 60s. I unfortunately lost out on a Ref. 165.001 in superb condition. However, recently I found a Ref. 14765 SC-61 in similarly excellent condition, and I plan to pick it up. Before I do, is there any reason why I should hold out for a Ref. 165.001?
To my understanding, the models are practically identical. Technically, I believe that the Ref. 14765 falls under the "Seamaster DeVille" line. There are a few, very minor aesthetic differences between the two models, but the overall appearance and the movement are the same.
As an aside, what would you consider a fair price for a 1960s vintage Seamaster in excellent condition? 18k gold case, including gold caseback with seahorse medallion. I see them in the $2-3k range fairly frequently and was curious if that is inflated or not.
Thank you!