4011021
·No matter what, please don't nick name it "Daniel Craig" Seamaster
No matter what, please don't nick name it "Daniel Craig" Seamaster
Was already virtually confirmed anyway but to remove any doubt, it is absolutely a first gen wave dial. Fratello has uploaded the best image yet:
Agree with them as well the bezel ring looks matte. There's no way they'd go to aluminium for a standard model so it's either matte ceramic or some kind of limited/special edition. I'd guess the former.
Well they did for the blue 60th and this looks awfully like a black rehash of that. It is otherwise identical
M OfanThe thickness of the current Diver 300M is 13.6 mm.
The thickness of the NTTD is 13.0 mm. This is probably because the movement is flatter, as it has no date.
The glass of the NTTD is more curved (higher) than that of the 60th anniversary James Bond.
if the new Diver 300M is a mix of the NTTD and the 60th anniversary James Bond (the best of both worlds), then the new Diver 300M might actually be thinner than the current generation.
Perhaps even less than 13mm if the glass of the new Diver 300M corresponds to that of the 60th anniversary James Bond.
Realistically even if it does meet all our wildest dreams, I won't buy it because I'll never part with my GoldenEye and I don't need two Seamaster Pro divers. But I would love to see a Seamaster that good in the lineup anyway. I never quite liked the ceramic wave dial, felt too cluttered and chunky. Seems to be the trend, Rolex did something similar a while ago with their maxi cases.
I really feel like the SMP should remain a sleeker, almost dressy diver like the first gen, and the Planet Ocean is better suited to the tanky tool diver. But that's just me.
Always a lot of wishful thinking when Omega teases these new releases like this. I might as well add to it ... I hope they skip the display back give us something similar to the NTTD.
Agreed, display casebacks are nice but Rolex have proven to us they aren't necessary especially if it contributes to keeping the watch profile slimmer.
I'd be okay with an aluminum bezel. Ceramic is a beautiful material but I've just never been convinced that it's the "right" material for an insert and I don't attach the "premium" adjective to it. I know, I know, I'm in the small majority. I also am one for a solid case back, but not for thickness reduction reasons. I do like the display back on my green Seamaster but practically, just put a solid case back on it. I just like relatively unadorned case backs. I'd even swap a Speedmaster Moon case back for a plain one if I got a new Speedmaster and there was one available. If they do a solid case back, aluminum insert, sword hands, small waves, date at 6, keep the rest of the modern details, add a nice bracelet like a 1610, 1450, something and I'd be interested.
I can't do much for the case dimensions or price but for the black no wave no date dial with ceramic bezel and bracelet options, how about...
I think this is more accurate to what Daniel is wearing, but we know what milanese bracelets look like already so I've mocked it up on a tapered Bond bracelet. I personally prefer the wave dial to plain, but accept I'm probably in the minority. I will say though, if it loses some weight, I'd prefer this over an equivalent Rolex Sub hands down.