nlogax
·Having owned an SM300 165.024, and lusted after a 2254.00 when they were new, I'll give the new 300M a 3.5/5
It looks solid, has a clean coherent design language with plenty of historical callbacks, the domed crystal is awesome, has a decent movement, they avoided tastelessly blinging it up etc.
I have to mark it down for: it's too big (40mm would be more wearable); the HE valve looks too chonky (conical just doesnt visually balance with the crown); the sapphire caseback (tool watches have closed steel casebacks, period); the mesh bracelet is a bit too fashionable (it'll soon look very dated, and a proper bracelet would be better); and finally that price... 6.5k USD pretax is what - double the price of a Black Bay 58? Then again, its still only 2/3rds the price of a no-date Sub, so maybe that's where they're positioning it.
It looks solid, has a clean coherent design language with plenty of historical callbacks, the domed crystal is awesome, has a decent movement, they avoided tastelessly blinging it up etc.
I have to mark it down for: it's too big (40mm would be more wearable); the HE valve looks too chonky (conical just doesnt visually balance with the crown); the sapphire caseback (tool watches have closed steel casebacks, period); the mesh bracelet is a bit too fashionable (it'll soon look very dated, and a proper bracelet would be better); and finally that price... 6.5k USD pretax is what - double the price of a Black Bay 58? Then again, its still only 2/3rds the price of a no-date Sub, so maybe that's where they're positioning it.
Edited: