- Posts
- 5
- Likes
- 0
klock379
·Hi all,
I am new to this forum and new to vintage watch purchasing. I would appreciate your help in assessing a piece I am considering.
I am interested in a birth-year Omega Constellation and have been doing a lot of research and learning. But I don't believe I've managed to scratch the surface still. I would like to seek experts' help to assess the quality of this piece.
The basics:
The piece in question is supposed to have been produced in 1972, ref number 168.005. According to the description, it has the original dial, hands, and crystal with the Omega logo. The movement is 564. It also claims the crown may have been replaced and not original to this model.
The case:
It looks sharp to my untrained eyes, all bevels and chamfers are retained The same applies to those lugs. The bezel looks to be present.
The crown:
The listing says the crown may not be original. I saw pictures of older Constellations with decagonal crowns but not sure if that applies to Constellations in the 70's
The case back:
The medallion on the case back looks right to me, but not sure about the level of detail, if it has been (over) polished.
I don't know enough to pick out anything significant on the backside of the case back.
The dial:
It seems to have passed the MOY test, and those indexes seem to have onyx inlays, not being painted on. The date window seems to have the right look/facets. But in the full-frontal picture, something about the text alignment seems a bit off to me. Also, the color, I thought it would be more silvery, than ivory.
The movement:
It seems to have all the screws, case clamps, and rotor clamps. Movement 564 is right for the era, and with the serial number to match. The bridge looks right. I recalled someone on this forum saying the big "O" on the rotor meant it is a replacement part. Is that so? Reason to be concerned?
I did what I could to identify the piece, which led me to believe this is worth considering. At the same time, I am sure I missed a ton. If I can ask experts in this forum to help either build or destroy my case, I will be most grateful.
I am new to this forum and new to vintage watch purchasing. I would appreciate your help in assessing a piece I am considering.
I am interested in a birth-year Omega Constellation and have been doing a lot of research and learning. But I don't believe I've managed to scratch the surface still. I would like to seek experts' help to assess the quality of this piece.
The basics:
The piece in question is supposed to have been produced in 1972, ref number 168.005. According to the description, it has the original dial, hands, and crystal with the Omega logo. The movement is 564. It also claims the crown may have been replaced and not original to this model.
The case:
It looks sharp to my untrained eyes, all bevels and chamfers are retained The same applies to those lugs. The bezel looks to be present.
The crown:
The listing says the crown may not be original. I saw pictures of older Constellations with decagonal crowns but not sure if that applies to Constellations in the 70's
The case back:
The medallion on the case back looks right to me, but not sure about the level of detail, if it has been (over) polished.
I don't know enough to pick out anything significant on the backside of the case back.
The dial:
It seems to have passed the MOY test, and those indexes seem to have onyx inlays, not being painted on. The date window seems to have the right look/facets. But in the full-frontal picture, something about the text alignment seems a bit off to me. Also, the color, I thought it would be more silvery, than ivory.
The movement:
It seems to have all the screws, case clamps, and rotor clamps. Movement 564 is right for the era, and with the serial number to match. The bridge looks right. I recalled someone on this forum saying the big "O" on the rotor meant it is a replacement part. Is that so? Reason to be concerned?
I did what I could to identify the piece, which led me to believe this is worth considering. At the same time, I am sure I missed a ton. If I can ask experts in this forum to help either build or destroy my case, I will be most grateful.
Edited: