Also, you’re probably aware (since you acknowledge “mid-sized”), but know that this watch is 36.25mm in diameter. Those of us who appreciate vintage proportions don’t mind, but most wearers accustomed to modern 42mm divers would find this watch to be very small—the 36.25 includes the bezel, so the actual dial is indeed quite tiny by today’s standards. Not a problem if you have a small wrist. But something to seriously consider if you’re unsure.
I’ve become a devotee of the third-gen divers—the first ones with ceramic bezels, and, at 41mm, the perfect size on a typical 6.5 - 7” wrist. They can commonly be had around $3k, fwiw. If you suspect you’ll end up tiring of the smaller piece you posted, then it could be worth saving up for one you’re bound to like more. Many of us here on the forum have bought watches that, in hindsight, we shouldn’t have—then paid to service them, only to end up selling them at a loss. It’s cheaper to wait and buy the watch you really want the first time.