Phillips Watch Auction Geneva 9

Posts
2,835
Likes
9,177
Can people post pictures and lot numbers of the watches they are referencing? It's hard for me to keep track as it is and will be harder for people who want to reference this thread in the future... 😀
 
Posts
2,026
Likes
7,157
Can people post pictures and lot numbers of the watches they are referencing? It's hard for me to keep track as it is and will be harder for people who want to reference this thread in the future... 😀
We were quite a bit busy 🍿 during the show... but I went back and added some references. 👍
 
Posts
153
Likes
976
Lot 152 (Paul Newman 6241) had sold for 197,000CHF in 2013 and sold for 220,000CHF today again.... isn't that a bit disappointing??
Or a sign that the Paul Newman frenzy is cooling off??


I don't think the Lesson One prices were representative of market. For example in the Hodinkee "reference points" article on PNs in 2014, a 6241 was valued at a 10-15% premium to a 6239 worth $75k (mid-2013 auction value), i.e. 83-86k. Decent 6241 PNs were being sold at around 170k in 2017, so 220k + premium today looks like continued gains to me.

https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/reference-points-the-paul-newman-daytona
 
Posts
5,048
Likes
15,524
one of the most important wristwatches of the 20th century

Please don't take me wrong, I am looking for enlightenment here : when watchblogs/auction houses coin phrases like this, what exactly do they mean? Why is this 'most important' (other than to drum up hoo-haa so folks can throw 'most money')? Was it the first timepiece that spawned the wrist watch revolution (from pocket watches)? Did it have something new, that nothing else did, and that has resulted in wrist-watches being how they are today? I really don't get it...

Edit : what I do get is that it is a really rare piece, with crazy provenance to back it up. But nothing more.
 
Posts
2,026
Likes
7,157
I don't think the Lesson One prices were representative of market. For example in the Hodinkee "reference points" article on PNs in 2014, a 6241 was valued at a 10-15% premium to a 6239 worth $75k (mid-2013 auction value), i.e. 83-86k. Decent 6241 PNs were being sold at around 170k in 2017, so 220k + premium today looks like continued gains to me.

https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/reference-points-the-paul-newman-daytona

Thanks for chiming in!!
I initially thought that the 2013 prices I was referencing were hammer prices... whenever they were final prices with premium and all.
I will have to dig in more 1:1 comparisons for Daytonas, including non-PN, to see if my impression of prices leveling off is supported by facts or if it is just that... an impression.
 
Posts
733
Likes
1,457
Thanks for chiming in!!
I initially thought that the 2013 prices I was referencing were hammer prices... whenever they were final prices with premium and all.
I will have to dig in more 1:1 comparisons for Daytonas, including non-PN, to see if my impression of prices leveling off is supported by facts or if it is just that... an impression.

I second this. That would be quite interesting. If one were inclined to one could run some statistical shenanigans on those numbers and see if any differences reach statistical significance.
 
Posts
153
Likes
976
I didn't check lesson one results but usually the webpage/results is updated to be after fees some time after the auction, whereas the Phillips site had not yet for the weekend's auctions, thus the 220 is hammer only I believe.

While there has been price progression in general for ordinary Daytonas and PNs over the time period 2013-17-19, I think there may have been softening from a peak late last year or early this year. I look forward to seeing your data if you choose to look into it further.
 
Posts
7,578
Likes
34,769
Please don't take me wrong, I am looking for enlightenment here : when watchblogs/auction houses coin phrases like this, what exactly do they mean? Why is this 'most important' (other than to drum up hoo-haa so folks can throw 'most money')? Was it the first timepiece that spawned the wrist watch revolution (from pocket watches)? Did it have something new, that nothing else did, and that has resulted in wrist-watches being how they are today? I really don't get it...

Edit : what I do get is that it is a really rare piece, with crazy provenance to back it up. But nothing more.

It think it was most important as it was the one watch that inspired Frank Muller's entire product range 😜
 
Posts
5,282
Likes
24,095
Black racing was ok. Rare as hens teeth and a bit cheap. It’s the larger subdial version with AML and no pro marking. I can not work out which version Is more valuable as the painted logo racing dial appears to be a whole new plate - that is an entirely new dial design, where as the non pro might be on the same plate as a standard dial. I personally like the pro version better for that special dial.

The gold BA145.022 was the round oval dial version. I can only imagine that a good one with the oval dial will hit $100k soon.
 
Posts
677
Likes
1,273
...and this nearly "as new" Submariner 5508, Lot 213, is def. going strong...



This is the weirdest outcome of these auctions. How can someone pay 400,000 CHF for this "okeyish" 5508? Nothing explains this extremely high price relative secondary market prices. It's not a very rare watch. Condition is not exceptional. Provenance is unknown. My first guess is that the auction was inflated by buyers-on-purpose, i.e. merchants who hold inventories in early subs and who want to anchor prices as high as possible (i.e. to replicate what was done with daytonas). My second guess is that there were two lunatic buyers in the room or on the phone who have no clue of what they were buying. But of course, my first guess is my preferred option.
 
Posts
676
Likes
1,053
Black racing was ok. Rare as hens teeth and a bit cheap. It’s the larger subdial version with AML and no pro marking. I can not work out which version Is more valuable as the painted logo racing dial appears to be a whole new plate - that is an entirely new dial design, where as the non pro might be on the same plate as a standard dial. I personally like the pro version better for that special dial.

The gold BA145.022 was the round oval dial version. I can only imagine that a good one with the oval dial will hit $100k soon.
That BA was in verrrrrry good shape and with a very good crater box. Another in fine shape without a box hammered at 40k chf at Antiquorum yesterday
 
Posts
6,618
Likes
11,377
Sale price of 32,500 CHF

676_3.jpg
 
Posts
2,421
Likes
4,675
I can't exactly see the "Chestnut Tropical Dial" and usually follow "if you can't really see the brown, it's not there". So, what do we have here?
A somehow nice 145.012 with a tired DON. All in all a pretty strong price for a 145.012 that overall somehow doesn't look "organic" to me.

 
Posts
7,142
Likes
13,268
Please don't take me wrong, I am looking for enlightenment here : when watchblogs/auction houses coin phrases like this, what exactly do they mean? Why is this 'most important' (other than to drum up hoo-haa so folks can throw 'most money')? Was it the first timepiece that spawned the wrist watch revolution (from pocket watches)? Did it have something new, that nothing else did, and that has resulted in wrist-watches being how they are today? I really don't get it...

Edit : what I do get is that it is a really rare piece, with crazy provenance to back it up. But nothing more.
You ask a fair question. To someone not plugged in to the history and development of the wristwatch this would just seem to be another complicated watch, the kind we see today coming from many manufacturers. Yawn. But if you go back to 1935 and the technology available, this was a huge deal. Wristwatches were just coming into their own after really being popularized around WWI. Complicated pocket watches had been around for over a hundred years, but miniaturizing complications like calendars and minute repeaters to fit in a wristwatch was a difficult exercise, only the best workmen would take on that kind of challenge and it was a slow and tedious process. Truly hand made watches. So in 1935 Vacheron Constantin gets a request from a wealthy client who wants a minute repeater and a perpetual calendar in a wristwatch. In that time frame there are only two other watches that complicated, a Patek Philippe retrograde calendar/minute repeater (now in their museum) and a platinum tonneau one that had a perpetual calendar, minute repeater and I believe a one button chronograph, the so called Shultz watch. It hasn't been seen in over 30 years. So here is VC, in the depression, being requested to make a very complicated watch that in todays dollars would cost about $1.2M.

It takes VC five years to finally make and deliver this piece. Only the top workmen could make the minute repeater mechanism, another person made the calendar mechanism, someone else made the complicated case, same with the dial, etc, etc. The layout with the crown at 12 o'clock, the slide on the right side, along with a retrograde date, puts this watch into another realm as far as the wristwatch development was concerned. It was, is, a tour de force of that era. It joins the PP and the Schultz as the most complicated watches of that era.

The provenance is interesting, little was known about the watch until it was finally flushed out of the original owner's family and completely reconditioned after having sat in a poorly ventilated vault somewhere in Central or South America. It had never been polished, it had the original monogram on the back, the history of the owner became known, VC found the diagrams and ordering correspondence. The calendar is actually a perpetual calendar but the owner wanted simplicity so that part of the mechanism was disconnected. Again, the top people in the world today brought it back from the dead, Philippe Dufour and others. For someone who loves groundbreaking stuff this is a holy grail piece. Auction houses hype a lot of stuff, but this piece was not overhyped. It is a historically important piece in the development of the complicated wristwatch. It was a bargain, imo, at CHF 740,000.
Edited:
 
Posts
2,026
Likes
7,157
You ask a fair question. To someone not plugged in to the history and development of the wristwatch this would just seem to be another complicated watch, the kind we see today coming from many manufacturers. Yawn. But if you go back to 1935 and the technology available, this was a huge deal. Wristwatches were just coming into their own after really being popularized around WWI. Complicated pocket watches had been around for over a hundred years, but miniaturizing complications like calendars and minute repeaters to fit in a wristwatch was a difficult exercise, only the best workmen would take on that kind of challenge and it was a slow and tedious process. Truly hand made watches. So in 1935 Vacheron Constantin gets a request from a wealthy client who wants a minute repeater and a perpetual calendar in a wristwatch. In that time frame there are only two other watches that complicated, a Patek Philippe retrograde calendar/minute repeater (now in their museum) and a platinum tonneau one that had a perpetual calendar, minute repeater and I believe a one button chronograph, the so called Shultz watch. It hasn't been seen in over 30 years. So here is VC, in the depression, being requested to make a very complicated watch that in todays dollars would cost about $1.2M.

It takes VC five years to finally make and deliver this piece. Only the top workmen could make the minute repeater mechanism, another person made the calendar mechanism, someone else made the complicated case, same with the dial, etc, etc. The layout with the crown at 12 o'clock, the slide on the right side, along with a retrograde date, puts this watch into another realm as far as the wristwatch development was concerned. It was, is, a tour de force of that era. It joins the PP and the Schultz as the most complicated watches of that era.

The provenance is interesting, little was known about the watch until it was finally flushed out of the original owner's family and completely reconditioned after having sat in a poorly ventilated vault somewhere in Central or South America. It had never been polished, it had the original monogram on the back, the history of the owner became known, VC found the diagrams and ordering correspondence. The calendar is actually a perpetual calendar but the owner wanted simplicity so that part of the mechanism was disconnected. Again, the top people in the world today brought it back from the dead, Philippe Dufour and others. For someone who loves groundbreaking stuff this is a holy grail piece. Auction houses hype a lot of stuff, but this piece was not overhyped. It is a historically important piece in the development of the complicated wristwatch. It was a bargain, imo, at CHF 740,000.

Hmmm, not so sure about this. I mean, 740,000 CHF is certainly not pocket change (at least for me!), but this watch is "so special" until the next "very special" is unearthed from god knows where.
What has been more interesting for me is to see more and more "restored" watches (and openly presented as such in comparison to potential "put together" watches, which I am sure have already been numerous to be going on the block) coming to auction, with relatively mixed results (which gives me some hope for this hobby).
A sign of houses running of pristine examples? Several articles have been indicating that collector to collector sales are becoming much more common, thus bypassing auction houses.
 
Posts
1,612
Likes
3,837
I can't exactly see the "Chestnut Tropical Dial" and usually follow "if you can't really see the brown, it's not there". So, what do we have here?
A somehow nice 145.012 with a tired DON. All in all a pretty strong price for a 145.012 that overall somehow doesn't look "organic" to me.


Not "organic"? Would you mean bleached bezel and touched up lume? Genuine question, I'm a French speaker, some details may be lost in translation...