If you bring the watches to a window that gets indirect light, you’ll get the best photos. Wonderful to have the watches and I assume good memories that go along with them
They are both legit. The first one is not going to be particularly interesting to collectors, since it is a later quartz model. But if you like it, most likely all it needs is a battery.
The second one is probably from the 1940s and worth fixing up. Unfortunately, the dial has some damage, but it's still a nice heirloom. To give more definitive and accurate information, we would need to have photos of the inside of that watch. Particularly of the movement and of the inside of the caseback, with particular effort to capture an engraved numbers.
Thanks Dan I guess I will need to take it to a shop to have the back removed. I noticed that once I twisted the dial a couple of times it fired back into life. It's interesting you say 1940's: my dad was in the British army until around 1947 before emigrating to Australia. So I'm guessing it was bought in the UK?
I'm.more interested in their history and getting a bit of perspective on them. Their value is not that important. I do think the Roman numeral watch is cool and probably worth restoration
I'm too old to stand on my head on the computer desk which is a tall old watch maker's table.
With a service and a new crystal I could give the older Omega with the Roman numeral markers a berth in the Home For Wayward Watches.
Once the watchmaker opens it for servicing and gets some numbers off the movement and case back for a fee you can get a archive of where the watch was delivered ( sold country only ) and year.
Are you in Australia, will point you to a service centre if so.
It's interesting you say 1940's: my dad was in the British army until around 1947 before emigrating to Australia. So I'm guessing it was bought in the UK?