Omega T17 Restoration - Local or Through Swatch Group?

Posts
7
Likes
8
If the watch was working well for 24 hours, then it doesn't sound like you need a donor movement (which will probably have worn out parts as well) unless you damaged something when stripping it. The hairspring issue may very well be recoverable, it depends on what the damage is.

I think that the best is to get it to a watchmaker even though it is in parts. It may cost more as the watch arrives disassembled but leave it to the watchmaker to advise and most of us won't take on a small "get it over the line" job so, expect to pay for a full service. Ask the watchmaker for advice on how to send it as you don't want all the parts rattling around and damaging each other.

Good luck and I'm sure it will be a lovely reliable watch at the end. If you can get Al (@Archer) to look at it, that would be a bonus.

Cheers, Chris

Thank you, agree with you on getting to a watchmaker. Archer actually already declined, so I'm considering other folks recommended by Larry and others. Parts are all secure and could be ship-ready shortly.
 
Posts
247
Likes
710
Unless there is something very specifically wrong with a watch - missing bridges, wheels, balance, etc - I don’t recommend buying ‘donor movements’. Donor movements don’t usually come out of perfectly preserved watches, they are usually watches that have been damaged. Common wear points are common to all movements. Scored pallet stones, cut train wheel pivots, worn bushings, etc. The chances of the donor movement having the same issues as the original movement is quite high. If a a watchmaker tells you to buy a donor movement then it would be a good idea, as they have examined it at that point.

A problem with a balance spring might look bad but could actually be a relatively simple adjustment.
 
Posts
2,317
Likes
19,739
There's no need to replace the movement. T17 parts are still available. A watchmaker should be able to diagnose mechanical issues and replace parts as needed.

Your watch was issued with a case number and movement number. Replacing the movement will render it spurious in Omega's records. In other words, Omega wouldn't be able to issue an extract confirming its originality once the movement is replaced.

This '43 ref 3635 T17 . . .



. . . was serviced by my watchmaker in Ventura County, Southern California. He was able to source a critical movement part from his usual supplier in the Midwest.

Cordially,

Art
 
Posts
7
Likes
8
There's no need to replace the movement. T17 parts are still available. A watchmaker should be able to diagnose mechanical issues and replace parts as needed.

Your watch was issued with a case number and movement number. Replacing the movement will render it spurious in Omega's records. In other words, Omega wouldn't be able to issue an extract confirming its originality once the movement is replaced.

This '43 ref 3635 T17 . . .



. . . was serviced by my watchmaker in Ventura County, Southern California. He was able to source a critical movement part from his usual supplier in the Midwest.

Cordially,

Art


Thank you, this makes sense. I won't look into that unless I'm told by a professional I should.

That is a really beautiful watch. I hope I can get mine to look anything like that.
 
Posts
2,317
Likes
19,739
Thank you, this makes sense. I won't look into that unless I'm told by a professional I should.

That is a really beautiful watch. I hope I can get mine to look anything like that.

A watchmaker who advises movement exchange is discounting the value, both sentimental and material, of retaining the original movement.
It could well be there are so many parts requiring replacement that it would make financial sense to exchange the movement for one in better condition. However, the money saved will be offset by loss of originality.

Art
 
Posts
14,566
Likes
42,126
Or buy a parts one if that proves to be the answer, and swap the barrel bridge which is where the serial numbers are.
 
Posts
27,951
Likes
71,250
A watchmaker who advises movement exchange is discounting the value, both sentimental and material, of retaining the original movement.
It could well be there are so many parts requiring replacement that it would make financial sense to exchange the movement for one in better condition. However, the money saved will be offset by loss of originality.

Art

Don't think anyone is saying the movement should be swapped, just that a donor is available for parts if needed.
 
Posts
2,317
Likes
19,739
Don't think anyone is saying the movement should be swapped, just that a donor is available for parts if needed.

No problem at all with acquiring a movement to harvest parts - I've done the same!

Art