'Omega Speedmaster Pre Moon 145.022 ST 69 - 1969' how much is original?

Posts
1,313
Likes
1,673
It has a replacement movement circa 1980s, service crystal, service crown, the bezel and insert look a bit mangled between 4 and 6, but I'm interested to know what else is not right with this, and if it's worth considering for the right price, and what might be the right price?
Cheers
Edited:
 
Posts
1,075
Likes
2,039
Pushers maybe not. Hands seem to be in really, really good condition for that vintage watch. I'm no expert.
 
Posts
1,658
Likes
3,381
The hands look very very bright and white.....
Compare them to the condition of the dial?
 
Posts
17,531
Likes
26,515
dial and mid case.
 
Posts
1,313
Likes
1,673
dial and mid case.

So dial, mid-case; you don't think the back is? how can you tell if the back is or isn't period correct?
Moon landing didn't happen until July of that year, but my guess is that pre-moon production would have continued for a while?
I'm thinking they should have a dust cover lid also?
The handset looks very bright as someone else pointed out, also I've seen a lot of these with dot at side of 90, but I would think dot over 90 is period correct for a 69 pre-moon, that this is a later service part, or similar?
Edited:
 
Posts
5,260
Likes
24,003
So dial, mid-case; you don't think the back is? how can you tell if the back is or isn't period correct?
......

Which period are we allocating to this watch? 😀


Its the kind of watch that has to be valued in parts.

On a bad day I would bid $1500 and regret wining. If I had a project in mind, and just had a really good week in work, I might pay $2500.
Any more than that and it will be a poison chalice - I might find myself pouring more and more into it than I could ever hope to recoup.

Or

Maybe I am too harsh. A speedmaster breaker might say:

Dial $600 - 800
Mvt $800 - 1200
Bezel $300 - 600
Case $1000 - 1500

But do I want to be a breaker? No, and it's a hard road to go down unless it's your business.
 
Posts
1,075
Likes
2,039
So dial, mid-case; you don't think the back is? how can you tell if the back is or isn't period correct?
Moon landing didn't happen until July of that year, but my guess is that pre-moon production would have continued for a while?
I'm thinking they should have a dust cover lid also?
The handset looks very bright as someone else pointed out, also I've seen a lot of these with dot at side of 90, but I would think dot over 90 is period correct for a 69 pre-moon, that this is a later service part, or similar?

Hands definitely not original.
Dustcover, yes, there should be a dust cover.
DON bezel is expected.
Pushers not original.
Dial isn't wrecked but has quite dirty/degraded lume.
You know the crown and movement isn't original.
Case back really doesn't matter at this point for value.

$2000 on a great day for me and I'd need to have some planned use for it and I wouldn't like it. I'm in much closer to $1000, really. There's really nothing I love about this vintage of Speedmaster left but a rough dial and okay looking case back.
 
Posts
1,313
Likes
1,673
Which period are we allocating to this watch? 😀


Its the kind of watch that has to be valued in parts.

On a bad day I would bid $1500 and regret wining. If I had a project in mind, and just had a really good week in work, I might pay $2500.
Any more than that and it will be a poison chalice - I might find myself pouring more and more into it than I could ever hope to recoup.

Or

Maybe I am too harsh. A speedmaster breaker might say:

Dial $600 - 800
Mvt $800 - 1200
Bezel $300 - 600
Case $1000 - 1500

But do I want to be a breaker? No, and it's a hard road to go down unless it's your business.

I completely agree with the notion of valuation based on parts.
I thought the dial would be worth more than the case, as I didn't think the case was from 145.022 ST 69, rather it was from a later iteration; but at the right price I'd be happy to buy it, as I'm just looking for a good-looking daily/beater that's not going to cost much more than £2,000.
 
Posts
1,313
Likes
1,673
Hands definitely not original.
Dustcover, yes, there should be a dust cover.
DON bezel is expected.
Pushers not original.
Dial isn't wrecked but has quite dirty/degraded lume.
You know the crown and movement isn't original.
Case back really doesn't matter at this point for value.

$2000 on a great day for me and I'd need to have some planned use for it and I wouldn't like it. I'm in much closer to $1000, really. There's really nothing I love about this vintage of Speedmaster left but a rough dial and okay looking case back.

Thank you, as I suspected DON should be present, lume is mouldy/dull looking for sure in stark contrast to the handset. I'm really looking for a good-looking daily/beater for around £2,000 that I don't have to worry too much about it getting knocked about, so it's not that important if it's not wholly original and doesn't go up in value .. I do really like the stepped-dial aesthetic of the earlier Speedmasters. If you know of any other contenders that you could suggest that might meet this modest criteria, I'd be very grateful.
 
Posts
240
Likes
581
as I suspected DON should be present,
Not necessarily -- there are later pre-moon 145.022-69's that have the 220 error, and then the standard tall font example as this watch does. I'm not saying it's original to this watch, but it could certainly be correct if we knew the movement serial (in the later 31M serial range).
Edited:
 
Posts
1,075
Likes
2,039
Thank you, as I suspected DON should be present, lume is mouldy/dull looking for sure in stark contrast to the handset. I'm really looking for a good-looking daily/beater for around £2,000 that I don't have to worry too much about it getting knocked about, so it's not that important if it's not wholly original and doesn't go up in value .. I do really like the stepped-dial aesthetic of the earlier Speedmasters. If you know of any other contenders that you could suggest that might meet this modest criteria, I'd be very grateful.

£2,000 is pretty tight. You're not finding a ref. 145.022 step dial for that much. Even the new master chronometer step dial is going to be about £3,500. You might find a Broad Arrow Replica ref. 3594.50.00/3894.50.00 for around that. For reference, I'd price mine around £6,000 with the original ref. 1039/516 bracelet and service crown (I have the original . . .somewhere).
 
Posts
1,313
Likes
1,673
£2,000 is pretty tight. You're not finding a ref. 145.022 step dial for that much. Even the new master chronometer step dial is going to be about £3,500. You might find a Broad Arrow Replica ref. 3594.50.00/3894.50.00 for around that. For reference, I'd price mine around £6,000 with the original ref. 1039/516 bracelet and service crown (I have the original . . .somewhere).

I Appreciate that, but yours looks pretty damn good; I'm actually looking for something that's a bit compromised, for example having the movement replaced etc. as I want to use it as a daily/beater👍
 
Posts
1,313
Likes
1,673
Not necessarily -- there are later pre-moon 145.022-69's that have the 220 error, and then the standard tall font example as this watch does. I'm not saying it's original to this watch, but it could certainly be correct if we knew the movement serial (in the later 31M serial range).

Oh yes, I'm pretty sure I read that on the Speedmaster 101 website.
 
Posts
1,313
Likes
1,673
'145.022-69 Bezel Missprint 220 For a very short time, there was a DN90 bezel with 220 instead of 225. For me, there is no reason to pursue one of these to the exclusion of other, perhaps better examples. For me if it has one, then great. I do not think it adds much value in the market, although it is rare'
 
Posts
4,931
Likes
17,209
...I'm actually looking for something that's a bit compromised, for example having the movement replaced etc. as I want to use it as a daily/beater👍

I can understand and appreciate why you'd want to save a beat-up and compromised speedmaster.

But a daily doesn't need to have swapped parts and beaten up. Sure, you aren't concerned during the day about scratches, but you may not be getting as much joy by looking at and using a watch that makes you smile.

This is my daily and the most beater of my few speedmasters. It makes me happy wearing it. I love the story behind it, that it was an expression of exuberance and the world come together in celebration. It has scratches and wear, so I don't worry about a few more.




If getting the cheapest speedmaster you can find and bringing it back to life makes you happy, go for it. That's fantastic and a worthy project. You should be happy when you look at it and think, I saved this. But a beater doesn't have to be beaten.
 
Posts
1,313
Likes
1,673
I can understand and appreciate why you'd want to save a beat-up and compromised speedmaster.

But a daily doesn't need to have swapped parts and beaten up. Sure, you aren't concerned during the day about scratches, but you may not be getting as much joy by looking at and using a watch that makes you smile.

This is my daily and the most beater of my few speedmasters. It makes me happy wearing it. I love the story behind it, that it was an expression of exuberance and the world come together in celebration. It has scratches and wear, so I don't worry about a few more.




If getting the cheapest speedmaster you can find and bringing it back to life makes you happy, go for it. That's fantastic and a worthy project. You should be happy when you look at it and think, I saved this. But a beater doesn't have to be beaten.

You make an excellent argument, but I wouldn't feel comfortable with anything more than £2,000 ($2500 USD) on my wrist as a beater; yes I'd love one like yours, it's really lovely, but I think the likelihood of me ever finding one within that price range would be close to impossible nowadays..
 
Posts
11,267
Likes
19,740
Beaters can still be attractive though and That is one ugly Speedmaster.
With a strict budget of £2000 you’re going to struggle for anything that’s worth owning and wearing, but you might find an 80’s or 90’s head only in worn condition if you’re very, very patient.
 
Posts
211
Likes
124
Very tough to find ANY Speedmaster Pro on a Speedy bracelet for under $3K. I'm not saying they don't exist. The watch shown is not all original or even close but it's a pre-moon Speedmaster with replacement parts on a Omega bracelet. I think it can easily sell for more than $3000 US.
 
Posts
1,075
Likes
2,039
I Appreciate that, but yours looks pretty damn good; I'm actually looking for something that's a bit compromised, for example having the movement replaced etc. as I want to use it as a daily/beater👍

Thank you. I don't wear it often at all because it's special and valuable and not totally water resistant. The concept of a daily beater is odd to me, despite this. I bought a new Seamaster (£3600) a couple years ago and wear it about 95% of the time. It's only stopped a few times since I've had it. I want a Speedmaster I can wear similarly. I'm thinking of a new Hesalite model and moving the vintage piece or putting money into it, ensuring it's waterproof, and going to town. I got it for a great price and will probably still be ahead after the refurbishment even. I just want to wear it and I don't mind the scratches, but I don't want to wreck it. I wouldn't mind proper lume, either. For now, the Relaunch (aka, Broad Arrow Replica) suffices for me. Good luck in your search.