Omega Speedmaster or Rolex Daytona.

Posts
119
Likes
31
I own a fully manual e46 m3 for a reason. But if I tracked it I’d have the SMG.

You will pry that car from my cold dead hands or when I find an affordable air cooled 911.
Now there is something we agree on!

I loved mine dearly...

Not without fault, but an animal of an engine!

One of the best BMW M cars ever produced!!
 
Posts
79
Likes
91
I have found the Daytona to be not only visually unappealing, but frankly, very difficult to read. To me, the Daytona is dated, while the Speedmaster is timeless. I realize these are just my own opinions, so YMMV.
 
Posts
201
Likes
195
I have found the Daytona to be not only visually unappealing, but frankly, very difficult to read. To me, the Daytona is dated, while the Speedmaster is timeless. I realize these are just my own opinions, so YMMV.

This. Money and availability aside, the Speedmaster is a timeless classic and extremely practical. The Daytona is ugly and illegible. And it got uglier over time. And I don’t have a problem with Rolex and like and own both the big brands. But the Speedmaster would always be my choice for the you-can-only-have-one-watch situation.
 
Posts
3,661
Likes
7,762
Also, to add to the conversation a bit, one of the things the Daytona is probably most visually known for is the ringed subdials. If that's a consideration, the Apollo 15 35th anniversary is an absolute stunner:



(@mbp 's image)
 
Posts
3,661
Likes
7,762
Zenith heard you…
You are welcome.
I’ll race you to the boutique. Warming up my Tesla now.



I wouldn't ever wear this, but in terms of how the sapphires are arranged, I think it's actually quite attractively done compared to many of the precious-stone bezel watches I've seen.
 
Posts
5,773
Likes
27,190
Also, to add to the conversation a bit, one of the things the Daytona is probably most visually known for is the ringed subdials. If that's a consideration, the Apollo 15 35th anniversary is an absolute stunner:



(@mbp 's image)
The Tokyo 2020 is similar but adds the red of the Lemans Daytona:

 
Posts
3,661
Likes
7,762
The Tokyo 2020 is similar but adds the red of the Lemans Daytona:

Right- the Tokyo 2020 is gold vs. the A15 35th's rose gold definitely makes these two visually quite different despite being so similar. I haven't seen either in person, but the rings on the subdials also appear to be tighter on the T2020.

It's incredible how much difference these slight variations can make- I see one of these watches as warm, vintage, soft, comfortable- and the other as sharp, modern, and bright.
 
Posts
1,480
Likes
8,092
I wouldn't ever wear this, but in terms of how the sapphires are arranged, I think it's actually quite attractively done compared to many of the precious-stone bezel watches I've seen.
Oh man, I’d rock the shit out of it. Asking price is absurd. Zenith doesn’t have the market to ask $110k for this. The gemset game is owned by Rolex and Patek.
 
Posts
3,661
Likes
7,762
Oh man, I’d rock the shit out of it. Asking price is absurd. Zenith doesn’t have the market to ask $110k for this. The gemset game is owned by Rolex and Patek.

I love gemstones- don't get me wrong. In this case I'd be concerned I'd bang the bezel against something and lose a sapphire!
 
Posts
8,711
Likes
14,616
...a masterbatory exercise in every way.
That would explain why so many of these threads are started.
 
Posts
15
Likes
6
From an esthetic standpoint, with those big crown guards around the pushers, the modern Daytonas just look too busy on that right side. I prefer the look of the early Daytonas, but of course, they are smaller case size than the modern ones. I've had a 6263 on my wrist before and it doesn't wear as small as you would expect (37mm case size) due to the bezel extending beyond the case a little and it is very comfortable. The Speedmaster has an almost a perfect case size and a classic look that is timeless. The newer Daytonas just look too flashy to me. But if that's what you're going for, have at it.
 
Posts
173
Likes
57
No, the Speedmaster is not on par with the Daytona.

It is far superior.
I think I agree with that. The history, quality, timeless design, luxury with a tool watch quality and just the best looking chronograph on the market. It must be because other than the Submariner, which tool watch has a longer lasting design than this? I guess for the Daytona there is no shame in second place.
 
Posts
173
Likes
57
Oh man. You came to the wrong place and asked the wrong question. This is Speedmaster Forum. Of course we know Daytona is superior.

More importantly, which Speedy and which Daytona are you eyeing? Lots of members here own both. Generally speaking, Speedy for a bigger bang for your bucks. The general public recognized Daytona as a more desirable watch.

Yes this is true, but most of that has to do with marketing. Rolex is on the arm of most celebrities. Not often do you see a moonwatch on Mark Wahlberg's arm. However, does that mean that it is an inferior watch. No. I think over the years they pushed Daytona towards the flashy market. Where Omega stay true to a legend and did not slide on it's morals and I am so glad they did. What a shame when Rolex took the beautiful Paul Newman Daytona and turned it into a fashion show. Remember, both watches will last more than a lifetime, both watches are high quality. So what's left? It's the history and the story. One is a legend the other is a pimped out version of a legend. I choose the true legend.
 
Posts
1,480
Likes
8,092
What a shame when Rolex took the beautiful Paul Newman Daytona and turned it into a fashion show.
lol, yeah, that’s shameful.
One is a legend the other is a pimped out version of a legend. I choose the true legend.
Majority of watch owners and most of general public disagreed with you.
So I know this as been done in some way or another more than 1000 times, but I want to look at it on each watches own merit. History and resale value is a large part of why people buy one of these two watches, however I want to get peoples options
you started the thread asking for my opinion. 8 months and 11 pages later pissing on the opinions you solicited. Go take a nap dude.

You are welcome.
 
Posts
1,480
Likes
8,092
Try them on if you can. The one that gives you that feeling is the one to go for.
he won’t. That’s why the bullshit Speedy vs. Daytona, in Omega Forums. Dude was looking for bias confirmation. Dragged this out 11 pages, then, resurrected it 8 months later.

It’s hard for some dudes to make up their own mind, about jewelry, I guess.
 
Posts
79
Likes
91
I think I agree with that. The history, quality, timeless design, luxury with a tool watch quality and just the best looking chronograph on the market. It must be because other than the Submariner, which tool watch has a longer lasting design than this? I guess for the Daytona there is no shame in second place.
I have never liked the styling of the Daytona. The only one I did like was the panda version from the late 60s that had the ecru dial with the black registers. I think the sting of losing the NASA spot to Omega has never been forgotten by Rolex.