Gt390
·Would there be a reason Omega might be reluctant to put the silicon balance in the 1861 movement. Meaning some problem with fitting it requiring large exspense or redesigning. Or would it just be a marketing choice.
M Matty1If I wanted a non LE Speedmaster pro. Would you buy current, wait for new model or even try to get the 321?
i doubt the old 321 will be reintroduced as it was then. unless, it is modified with modern omega patented inventions (as mentioned).
Would there be a reason Omega might be reluctant to put the silicon balance in the 1861 movement. Meaning some problem with fitting it requiring large exspense or redesigning. Or would it just be a marketing choice.
There's no technical reason why it could not be done. Personally I would love it because it would show where the accuracy of all the new movements really comes from...
😁
Not sure they want us to know and shoot themselves in the foot in the process... It may make more economical sense to segment the market and not upgrade "old" technology? But I'd like to see this too.
M Matty1Not everyone reads the forum. Can you elaborate?
I confess to being new to the OF and collecting watches, but would not replacing hairsprings as suggested lead to considering the watch to be a Frankenwatcch?
Delivery of these 50th anniversary Speedmasters is slated to be in the Jun/Jul/Aug timeframe which means they are already in production (or close to it), yet there has not been any sort of leaks within the Omega system, that is remarkable.