Omega seamster calendar

Posts
101
Likes
56
Hello OF
I have a question.
Is a right case back for this model?
Thank you!
 
Posts
24,606
Likes
54,642
It looks to be a legit US-made case. I would like to see better photos to evaluate the dial. And you will want to check for the US import code on the movement. In general it's best to include really good comprehensive photos when asking questions, since there are experts on the forum that can pick up things you might miss.
 
Posts
5,631
Likes
5,812
Looks right. If it's a US Collection case, and it probably is, it uses 11/16" straps. You can get those NOS on eBay or a 17mm will (usually) fit.
 
Posts
5,528
Likes
9,451
Interesting the Seller can take a great photo of the caseback, but what may well be a badly refinished dial is completely out of focus.
 
Posts
16,305
Likes
45,005
Interesting the Seller can take a great photo of the caseback, but what may well be a badly refinished dial is completely out of focus.
And what looks like may be a very heavily polished case- I’m seeing melted butter
 
Posts
5,631
Likes
5,812
And what looks like may be a very heavily polished case- I’m seeing melted butter
I think most of that is just the lens effect... taken too close with a cellphone lens. It's the rarest 2627-style case that hasn't been blunted at least a little from a buffer.
 
Posts
16,305
Likes
45,005
I think most of that is just the lens effect... taken too close with a cellphone lens. It's the rarest 2627-style case that hasn't been blunted at least a little from a buffer.
True, most watches over 25 years old have seen the business end of a buffing wheel- but the degree to which it has is a big determining factor in price and loss of all sharp case lines would be a deal breaker for me.
 
Posts
5,631
Likes
5,812
Interesting that it does not have "Seamaster" nor "Calendar" on the dial.
 
Posts
5,528
Likes
9,451
The text looks way better than in the blurred dial photo. Lots of variation between hour markers and minute marks, but hard to tell it that is partly due to distortion from the curve in the crystal.
 
Posts
3,921
Likes
43,364
Checking mine (with Seamaster and Calendar text), my minutes/hours markers are closer to the edge of the dial than this one.

To my eyes, I have the impression that the Automatic (in my case, Calendar and Seamaster) seems slightly thinner font than the Omega. Here, they seem similar.

Lastly, the C of the Automatic, here, seems a bit "detached"

Now all this could well be to the quality of the posted pictures.
 
Posts
13,438
Likes
18,650
Here is early 1950’s ad:


No model name on dial. That’s they way they rolled back then.
gatorcpa
 
Posts
34,897
Likes
39,455
US delivered ref 2627, ca1952.

That is very, very pretty. Don’t see too many of those dials that are still that clean.
 
Posts
16,305
Likes
45,005
That is very, very pretty. Don’t see too many of those dials that are still that clean.
Yeah, I thought my waffle dialed Seamaster was pretty clean- this just made me sad.
 
Posts
13,483
Likes
31,785
That is very, very pretty. Don’t see too many of those dials that are still that clean.

This one just ticks so many boxes in one package.
 
Posts
5,631
Likes
5,812
Checking mine (with Seamaster and Calendar text), my minutes/hours markers are closer to the edge of the dial than this one.
You're comparing your lume dial to the non-lume dial. You also have to take into account that there are different dial OEM and that OMEGA AUTOMATIC is one stamp, CALENDAR is another, and Seamaster is perhaps another.