Omega Seamaster Calendar ref. 14701-2 SC (1960) - family watch, looking for insights

Posts
11
Likes
3
Hello everyone,
I’ve recently joined the forum and I’d like to share an Omega Seamaster Calendar that belongs to my family and that I intend to keep as part of my personal collection.

The watch is an Omega Automatic Seamaster Calendar in stainless steel, powered by the automatic caliber 562. Based on the movement serial (18.8xx.xxx), the production period should be around 1960. The caseback is marked “acier inoxydable” and the date is set by advancing the hands, as expected for this movement. The crown is unsigned and appears to be consistent with the period.

The watch has recently been fully serviced by a professional watchmaker, with a complete overhaul, cleaning, lubrication and regulation, and the case received a light and conservative polish. No non-original parts were added. At the moment I’m not sharing movement photos, as the pictures I have were taken before the service.

Since this is a family watch, my goal is not to sell it but to understand it better and document it correctly for the future. During my research I noticed that I haven’t been able to find another Seamaster Calendar exactly identical to mine, especially in terms of dial details and overall configuration. I would really appreciate your thoughts on whether this is normal for this reference and period, and any insight into the small variations that may exist within this model.

Photos of the watch will follow below.
Thank you very much for your time and for sharing your knowledge - I’m here to learn.

Best regards

 
Posts
2,078
Likes
2,837
Congrats to your familiy watch!

Unfortunately the dial has been semi-professional repainted.
Otherwise the watch seems to be in good condition from what can be seen from these pictures. Crown is a non original replacement, the hands seem to be relumed.
Nothing of that should prevent you from wearing it!

All the best!
 
Posts
23,472
Likes
52,176
Welcome to OF and thanks for posting photos of your family watch, we can certainly give you some feedback on the watch. Unfortunately, AI is not very good at authenticating watches so you need to be critical of what the LLMs tell you.

@Passover has given a good analysis of the watch. Clearly someone cared a lot about maintaining this watch and keeping it looking good. Presumably, the dial became aged or damaged at some point and the case was also probably dented and scratched. As a result, they wanted to watch restored to look good and they had the dial repainted and the case refinished. Apparently the watchmaker servicing the movement didn't have access to authentic Omega parts, so replaced the crown with a generic part to improve water resistance. When this type of restoration is done locally, it looks a bit amateurish to the eyes of collectors, but the condition reflects the original owners desires, so you can appreciate it as a piece of history.
 
Posts
11
Likes
3
Thank you both very much for the warm welcome and for taking the time to share such detailed and thoughtful feedback - I really appreciate it.

I will also post photos of the caseback and the case shortly. Please note that these pictures were taken before the recent cleaning and full service of the watch, so they reflect its condition prior to the overhaul and conservative refinishing.

Since this is a family watch, my intention is not to challenge the analysis but to better understand its history and condition, and to document it as accurately as possible. I find your perspective very interesting, especially the idea that the watch reflects the choices and priorities of its previous owners over time.

Out of curiosity, I would also appreciate your thoughts on the current market value of a watch like this, and whether keeping it as a family piece rather than selling it would be a sensible decision in your opinion.

Thanks again to both of you for your time and expertise.

Best regards

 
Posts
11
Likes
3
Thank you again for your insights, they are very helpful.

I had one follow-up question regarding the crown. You mentioned that it appears to be a non-original replacement, and I was hoping you could elaborate a bit more on that point. My understanding was that unsigned crowns were sometimes used on earlier examples or during period servicing, so I would be very interested to learn what specific details suggest that this crown is a later replacement rather than a period-correct one.

Thanks in advance for taking the time to clarify - I’m trying to learn as much as possible.

Best regards
 
Posts
23,472
Likes
52,176
Unsigned crowns were not used on Omega watches at the time the OP watch was delivered, or installed during an official service in the last 60 years. You have a generic crown, unsigned and with the wrong size and shape.

The language in your original post suggests that have been using AI to get information about vintage Omega watches. We see this a lot from new members on the forum, but unfortunately the LLMs spew a mixture of good information and complete garbage, with equal confidence. Unsigned crowns were used much earlier (e.g. 1930s and much of the 1940s), but not at the time of the OP watch. Collectors are extremely well-versed in the appearance of correct crowns, and are easily able to distinguish original parts, from authentic service parts, from generic aftermarket parts based on their experience.

In good all-original condition, a watch like this (head-only) would have a fair-market value of $700 - $800, IMO. This is not retail or dealer pricing, but what a private seller could realistically realize. Because of the condition issues, I would say that the value is in the neighborhood of $400, mostly because of the value of the movement.
 
Posts
11
Likes
3
Welcome to OF and thanks for posting photos of your family watch, we can certainly give you some feedback on the watch. Unfortunately, AI is not very good at authenticating watches so you need to be critical of what the LLMs tell you.

@Passover has given a good analysis of the watch. Clearly someone cared a lot about maintaining this watch and keeping it looking good. Presumably, the dial became aged or damaged at some point and the case was also probably dented and scratched. As a result, they wanted to watch restored to look good and they had the dial repainted and the case refinished. Apparently the watchmaker servicing the movement didn't have access to authentic Omega parts, so replaced the crown with a generic part to improve water resistance. When this type of restoration is done locally, it looks a bit amateurish to the eyes of collectors, but the condition reflects the original owners desires, so you can appreciate it as a piece of history.
Just to clarify my side, I mainly used AI as a language support, since I’m Italian and my English is not always as precise as I would like it to be. The ideas, intentions and questions are mine, while the AI simply helped me express them more clearly in English.

That said, I fully agree that human expertise and direct experience are essential when it comes to authenticating and evaluating vintage watches, which is exactly why I really value the feedback from this community. Thanks again for taking the time to comment and share your knowledge.
 
Posts
11
Likes
3
Unsigned crowns were not used on Omega watches at the time the OP watch was delivered, or installed during an official service in the last 60 years. You have a generic crown, unsigned and with the wrong size and shape.

The language in your original post suggests that have been using AI to get information about vintage Omega watches. We see this a lot from new members on the forum, but unfortunately the LLMs spew a mixture of good information and complete garbage, with equal confidence. Unsigned crowns were used much earlier (e.g. 1930s and much of the 1940s), but not at the time of the OP watch. Collectors are extremely well-versed in the appearance of correct crowns, and are easily able to distinguish original parts, from authentic service parts, from generic aftermarket parts based on their experience.

In good all-original condition, a watch like this (head-only) would have a fair-market value of $700 - $800, IMO. This is not retail or dealer pricing, but what a private seller could realistically realize. Because of the condition issues, I would say that the value is in the neighborhood of $400, mostly because of the value of the movement.
Thank you for the detailed explanation and for taking the time to share your perspective - I really appreciate it.

I understand your point regarding the crown and how collectors are able to distinguish between original, correct service, and generic aftermarket parts. Since this is a family watch that I intend to keep, I would like to improve it where possible without doing anything incorrect.

If you don’t mind, I’d really appreciate some advice on how to properly source a correct Omega crown for this reference and period. In particular, I’d like to avoid incorrect or fake parts, as I know this is a common issue when buying crowns online. Are there specific references, dimensions, trusted sellers, or other best practices you would recommend when looking for an original or period-correct Omega crown?

Thanks again for sharing your knowledge - it’s very helpful for someone trying to learn and do things the right way.

Best regards
 
Posts
23,472
Likes
52,176
This thread shows the crown to be #42054, but I think that may be referring to a service replacement since the lists were published much later. It is not the thin scalloped crown.
 
Posts
2,741
Likes
5,521
Here is a no date 14700 same case as yours showing the original Seamaster coat hanger font and sharp case lines, and scalloped crown.
 
Posts
11
Likes
3
Thank you very much for taking the time to explain and for sharing the comparison photos - I really appreciate it.
I understand the points you are making, especially regarding the dial details and the crown, and I find the comparison with the 14700 very helpful. To allow for a more accurate evaluation, I will upload a higher-resolution close-up photo of my dial that I’ve just taken, so you can have a better look at the lettering and details.
Thanks again for your patience and willingness to share your expertise - it’s very helpful for me to learn and better understand this watch.
Best regards

 
Posts
11
Likes
3
Thank you very much for taking the time to explain and for sharing the comparison photos - I really appreciate it.
I understand the points you are making, especially regarding the dial details and the crown, and I find the comparison with the 14700 very helpful. To allow for a more accurate evaluation, I will upload a higher-resolution close-up photo of my dial that I’ve just taken, so you can have a better look at the lettering and details.
Thanks again for your patience and willingness to share your expertise - it’s very helpful for me to learn and better understand this watch.
Best regards

Just to add a bit more context: the circular marks visible on the dial were caused before the recent service, when two hour markers had come loose and ended up under the hands. When the watch was wound after many years of inactivity, the hands started moving and created those circular scratches.

I can also confirm that during the recent service the watchmaker relumed the hands.

 
Posts
11
Likes
3
Comunque lo curerò con il rispetto che merita un omega, e lo rimetterò in forma. 😊
 
Posts
2,741
Likes
5,521
Thank you very much for taking the time to explain and for sharing the comparison photos - I really appreciate it.
I understand the points you are making, especially regarding the dial details and the crown, and I find the comparison with the 14700 very helpful. To allow for a more accurate evaluation, I will upload a higher-resolution close-up photo of my dial that I’ve just taken, so you can have a better look at the lettering and details.
Thanks again for your patience and willingness to share your expertise - it’s very helpful for me to learn and better understand this watch.
Best regards



If you compare the font on your watch with this, you can see significant differences in the font, letter spacing, and alignment of the OMEGA AUTOMATIC and also Seamaster text. This does not impact the wearability of your lovely heirloom watch, but it shown for comparison to help in the assessment of dial originality. Noboby but us collecting nerds would notice this of course! You should enjoy and wear your watch.
 
Posts
11
Likes
3


If you compare the font on your watch with this, you can see significant differences in the font, letter spacing, and alignment of the OMEGA AUTOMATIC and also Seamaster text. This does not impact the wearability of your lovely heirloom watch, but it shown for comparison to help in the assessment of dial originality. Noboby but us collecting nerds would notice this of course! You should enjoy and wear your watch.
Thank you for the comparison, much appreciated. I do see the differences you’re pointing out.
In any case, the watch’s history and enjoyment on the wrist matter most to me - and I’m very happy wearing it.
Thanks again for the insight.
 
Posts
23,472
Likes
52,176


If you compare the font on your watch with this, you can see significant differences in the font, letter spacing, and alignment of the OMEGA AUTOMATIC and also Seamaster text. This does not impact the wearability of your lovely heirloom watch, but it shown for comparison to help in the assessment of dial originality. Noboby but us collecting nerds would notice this of course! You should enjoy and wear your watch.
I'm not sure if the OP is asking for further evidence, but I would add that the alignment of the minute track also has obvious issues. Markers are very uneven around some of the hour markers (e.g. four and five o'clock) and not aligned properly with the outer edge of the applied markers on the bottom half of the dial. To people who are accustomed to looking at dials, there are many clear tells.
 
Posts
11
Likes
3
This is my 14701, cal 562

I would kindly ask the experts on the forum for their opinion: assuming the dial is replaced with a correct one for the model, the crown is replaced with an original Omega crown, and an Omega strap is fitted, could the watch then be considered fully original from a collector’s standpoint?

Also, in your view, would it be worth doing this, or would it be better to keep the watch in its current condition, especially considering its historical and sentimental value?

Thank you in advance for your valuable advice.
 
Posts
732
Likes
9,010
I would kindly ask the experts on the forum for their opinion: assuming the dial is replaced with a correct one for the model, the crown is replaced with an original Omega crown, and an Omega strap is fitted, could the watch then be considered fully original from a collector’s standpoint?

Also, in your view, would it be worth doing this, or would it be better to keep the watch in its current condition, especially considering its historical and sentimental value?

Thank you in advance for your valuable advice.

Nowadays, the watch has sentimental value, and if you replace non-original parts with original ones, it will gain additional collector's value as well as material value.