timewise
·Hi everyone!
recently I've been looking around a bit to add a vintage Seamaster to my modern one, and I learned a lot from the forum already. Still the dazzling variety of calibres and dials make it difficult for me to identify overdone watches. I found a seemingly nice black dial Seamaster Calendar from 1961, cal. 503, and am now asking for your opinions.
It's a gold-filled version (so that isn't ideal but the case looks ok and neither worn off nor overpolished to me). If I read up correctly about the "K&L" marking in the caseback, this could be a US version and the equivalent reference would probably be 2849(-6SC)?
My main concern is that the dial looks almost too clean for that age, while there doesn't seem to be any lume anymore. Also I've seen a few other examples of this reference where the "Seamaster" print is in a separate line without any overlap with the "Calendar". Price around $600. So here are the pictures - thanks for any thoughts that you might have on this one!
recently I've been looking around a bit to add a vintage Seamaster to my modern one, and I learned a lot from the forum already. Still the dazzling variety of calibres and dials make it difficult for me to identify overdone watches. I found a seemingly nice black dial Seamaster Calendar from 1961, cal. 503, and am now asking for your opinions.
It's a gold-filled version (so that isn't ideal but the case looks ok and neither worn off nor overpolished to me). If I read up correctly about the "K&L" marking in the caseback, this could be a US version and the equivalent reference would probably be 2849(-6SC)?
My main concern is that the dial looks almost too clean for that age, while there doesn't seem to be any lume anymore. Also I've seen a few other examples of this reference where the "Seamaster" print is in a separate line without any overlap with the "Calendar". Price around $600. So here are the pictures - thanks for any thoughts that you might have on this one!