- Posts
- 19
- Likes
- 4
Omega Model
- Posts
- 1,856
- Likes
- 2,537
Passover
·Hi, is there a reference number on the inner caseback?
- Posts
- 19
- Likes
- 4
Tiketitan76
·yes.....9745xxx
- Posts
- 1,856
- Likes
- 2,537
Passover
·Did you try to do an internet research using this number?
by the way: No need to hide that number, what makes your watch singular is the movement number 9007446
There are other watches with 9745xxx as well but only one watch with 9007446
But of course you don't have to mention it 😀
by the way: No need to hide that number, what makes your watch singular is the movement number 9007446
There are other watches with 9745xxx as well but only one watch with 9007446
But of course you don't have to mention it 😀
- Posts
- 3,318
- Likes
- 7,037
mac_omega
·This number 9745xxx is most likely the case serial#
- Posts
- 616
- Likes
- 1,269
trash_gordon
·That number is the serial. Seems to have the original hands too. No idea which ref this is.
- Posts
- 19
- Likes
- 4
Tiketitan76
·Did you try to do an internet research using this number?
by the way: No need to hide that number, what makes your watch singular is the movement number 9007446
There are other watches with 9745xxx as well but only one watch with 9007446
But of course you don't have to mention it 😀
- Posts
- 17,528
- Likes
- 26,504
Foo2rama
··Keeps his worms in a ball instead of a can.If the caseback has an Omega logo it’s a very early wrist watch, and the correct case.
- Posts
- 3,318
- Likes
- 7,037
mac_omega
·I don't event know the caliber
this is easy - it is a cal. 23.4 SC
- Posts
- 32
- Likes
- 10
deni2s
·1939 Omega Naiad with 23.4SC caliber, ref CK 2064.
Not sure if it's not a redial (don't see "Swiss made" under 6), but then again there is this one - https://www.njuskalo.hr/muski-satovi/omega-naiad-medicus-oglas-14683830 . Also hands look too short for this case/dial... I would like to know other opinions.
Not sure if it's not a redial (don't see "Swiss made" under 6), but then again there is this one - https://www.njuskalo.hr/muski-satovi/omega-naiad-medicus-oglas-14683830 . Also hands look too short for this case/dial... I would like to know other opinions.
- Posts
- 19
- Likes
- 4
Tiketitan76
·D deni2s1939 Omega Naiad with 23.4SC caliber, ref CK 2064.
Not sure if it's not a redial (don't see "Swiss made" under 6), but then again there is this one - https://www.njuskalo.hr/muski-satovi/omega-naiad-medicus-oglas-14683830 . Also hands look too short for this case/dial... I would like to know other opinions.
D deni2s1939 Omega Naiad with 23.4SC caliber, ref CK 2064.
Not sure if it's not a redial (don't see "Swiss made" under 6), but then again there is this one - https://www.njuskalo.hr/muski-satovi/omega-naiad-medicus-oglas-14683830 . Also hands look too short for this case/dial... I would like to know other opinions.
- Posts
- 19
- Likes
- 4
Tiketitan76
·Bit the watch is so old, and for sure was used in WW2 ( he was a doctor in the british royal naby) that maybe he replaced the dial.....but I cant ask him ad he died 4 years ago
- Posts
- 19
- Likes
- 4
Tiketitan76
·Sorry for the text mistakes but my T9 on my mobile phone is set for Italian....
- Posts
- 1,314
- Likes
- 3,646
Tire-comedon
·D deni2s1939 Omega Naiad with 23.4SC caliber, ref CK 2064.
Not sure if it's not a redial (don't see "Swiss made" under 6), but then again there is this one - https://www.njuskalo.hr/muski-satovi/omega-naiad-medicus-oglas-14683830 . Also hands look too short for this case/dial... I would like to know other opinions.
Sorry, certainly not a 2064. Bezel is too thin, caseback different also, lugs have different shape.
What diameter is the case without lugs? From the pictures I would say it is a MI 2089 with 30.5mm diameter, but that's pure guessing...
- Posts
- 19
- Likes
- 4
Tiketitan76
·yes its 30,5mm and I don't think its waterproof......
- Posts
- 32
- Likes
- 10
deni2s
·yes its 30,5mm and I don't think its waterproof......
Could be MI 2089 case with movement & hands from Naiad?
MI 2089 was introduced in 1940, movement serial number suggests its from 1939, also hands look too short for this dial IMHO.
- Posts
- 19
- Likes
- 4
Tiketitan76
·for sure it was given the 23 May of 1940 (Birthday gift). in the back case there is the date and name of my grandpa.
- Posts
- 32
- Likes
- 10
deni2s
·I am new to Omega watches, so take my opinion with big grain of salt.
I believe there is possibility that 1939 movement could be used in early 1940 watch by Omega.
Some things I am not 100% sure about:
1) Hands are too short (minute and seconds hand don't reach the rail-track). I haven't seen original Omega watches at least from that time period with hands not reaching rail-track.
2) Most watches with that style M&H hands have different seconds hand (with piled counterweight). The ones I had found which have this config, I can't be sure, that seconds hand is not a replacement. I have a 1939 Naiad watch with similar config ( https://omegaforums.net/threads/1939-omega-naiad.87464/ ), and it's original seconds adjustment spring is not original, so I am not sure that is original seconds hand. I had found couple images online with similar config, but can't be sure 100% about any of them, that it's an original config.
3) About the dial - I wonder about the luck of "Swiss made" on it (but that could be ok, according to https://omegaforums.net/threads/own...es-not-say-swiss-made-fake.46197/#post-549070 ) and also about how the number 7 looks. The only dial with similar font of 7 I have found online is https://vintagecaliber.com/products/1940-omega-cal-30t2-jumbo . You can also note that that clock has replacement crystal, it was polished, it has replacement crown, so I wouldn't trust it has original dial (and number 3 on dial is different too).
I believe there is possibility that 1939 movement could be used in early 1940 watch by Omega.
Some things I am not 100% sure about:
1) Hands are too short (minute and seconds hand don't reach the rail-track). I haven't seen original Omega watches at least from that time period with hands not reaching rail-track.
2) Most watches with that style M&H hands have different seconds hand (with piled counterweight). The ones I had found which have this config, I can't be sure, that seconds hand is not a replacement. I have a 1939 Naiad watch with similar config ( https://omegaforums.net/threads/1939-omega-naiad.87464/ ), and it's original seconds adjustment spring is not original, so I am not sure that is original seconds hand. I had found couple images online with similar config, but can't be sure 100% about any of them, that it's an original config.
3) About the dial - I wonder about the luck of "Swiss made" on it (but that could be ok, according to https://omegaforums.net/threads/own...es-not-say-swiss-made-fake.46197/#post-549070 ) and also about how the number 7 looks. The only dial with similar font of 7 I have found online is https://vintagecaliber.com/products/1940-omega-cal-30t2-jumbo . You can also note that that clock has replacement crystal, it was polished, it has replacement crown, so I wouldn't trust it has original dial (and number 3 on dial is different too).
- Posts
- 17,528
- Likes
- 26,504
