Omega easily scratched?

Posts
2,703
Likes
3,601
Six images of polished surfaces under scanning electron microscope.


Technically, only 3 surfaces polished - the ones on the right. Steel is in the middle. So polishing does reduce the roughness, even on a microscopic level.

But I’m sure some members could see the difference from a blurry photo. 😉
 
Posts
714
Likes
719
I’m just asking the basic but apparently controversial question as to whether anyone else notices how easily these scratch. Some of my cheap watches just seemed obviously more durable, so I find it humorous.

My $300 seiko monster from 12 years ago has 0 scratches on it. But thats because I had it sandblasted ages ago so the entire surface is rough and matte.

The more "finished" a surface is, the more obvious scratches will be. Even matte surfaces on Omega watches have more of a satin sheen look because they're finely brushed.

You'll feel the pain for a little bit, and then stop noticing. It hurt for my first steel luxury watch, it hurt again for my first gold watch (oo boy does gold pick up scratches easily).
 
Posts
4
Likes
4
So your a very careful person 📖



But your not very careful 📖

And your worried about a few scratches and a comment of it’s a Tool watch…..

Hadn't seen this, but thats what's called a beater watch. I bought the 8900 well-worn and its what I put on for swimming, hiking, etc.

Imagine different care for different things! The 8912 is very carefully cared for and can’t help but collect scratches.
Edited: