Omega Constellation

aksan82 · Wed. 3:41pm

ErichKeane
168.045 still has a different bracelet interface, doesn't it? It seems to have the center 'tang' but otherwise female bracelet connection based on the examples I can see. But yes, no that you point it out, the above likely DOES have a

ErichKeane
168.045 still has a different bracelet interface, doesn't it? It seems to have the center 'tang' but otherwise female bracelet connection based on the examples I can see. But yes, no that you point it out, the above likely DOES have a missing bezel.

aksan82 · Wed. 3:42pm

ErichKeane
168.045 still has a different bracelet interface, doesn't it? It seems to have the center 'tang' but otherwise female bracelet connection based on the examples I can see. But yes, no that you point it out, the above likely DOES have a missing bezel.

Thank you both. I also noticed the watch seemed to have no separate bezel when I first received it. However, I agree that the bracelet interface doesn't exactly match the examples of ref. 168.045 that I've found. Could this be another reference using a similar case architecture and bezel?

Archer · Wed. 3:56pm

ErichKeane
168.045 still has a different bracelet interface, doesn't it? It seems to have the center 'tang' but otherwise female bracelet connection based on the examples I can see. But yes, no that you point it out, the above likely DOES have a missing bezel.

I didn't look at that, but yes you are right. That one has two slots with a narrow middle part.

Maybe the OP can provide the numbers on the inside of the clasp...

Omega Constellation

aksan82

aksan82

Archer

Similar threads

Omega Constellation 14393 Cal. 550 Dial/Crown Help

Omega Constellation Manhattan 398.0866 crystal and gasket

Omega Constellation ref. 14393 Cal. 561: Authentic?

Vintage Omega Constellation ID: Gold Deluxe Bracelet

Omega Constellation 396.1060 Missing Screws ID Help

Omega Constellation 2652 Dial: Hobnail or Honeycomb?