Omega Century cal 283 to bid or not to bid

Posts
16
Likes
1
Hey everyone,
Considering bidding on this century watch to add to my collection if I am able to get it at a reasonable price and don’t get eBay sniped. The watch movement itself looks really clean it was just serviced. My one question is around the dial. It could just be the angling but something about the numbers have me wanting a second opinion. I’ve seen similar with no numbers or 12,3,9 (no 6). I like the idea of a mechanical watch but again wanted a second opinion. It is me not the seller that covered the serial number. It is fully visible in the listing, but since it’s not my listing, I don’t want to share it. I will say the first three digits are 14.9xx,xxx also open to suggestions on a “highest bid” I like the watch but I’ve made poor choices before
 
Posts
12,741
Likes
17,249
Look real, but not a high value item. Case is gold plated and there is some wear through at the top of the lugs.

Assuming that it will need a service, if you bid $200 to $300, you will have $500 into the watch before you know it. Not sure you could recover that in the future.

Might be best to get a better watch that will cost you more.

Be careful.
gatorcpa
 
Posts
16
Likes
1
Look real, but not a high value item. Case is gold plated and there is some wear through at the top of the lugs.

Assuming that it will need a service, if you bid $200 to $300, you will have $500 into the watch before you know it. Not sure you could recover that in the future.

Might be best to get a better watch that will cost you more.

Be careful.
gatorcpa


Thanks Gator I appreciate the catch there. I think they said it had just been serviced but i would likely take it in anyway for a second opinion. But hearing what you are saying about value I am reconsidering. My thought was try and get it for <$300 and have it checked but not serviced unless they deemed it necessary.

Always appreciate recommendations of members. I like the older styles, and am ok with Quartz or automatic (in this case i liked the "james bond crosshair feel which is why i was ok with mechanical) as it sounds like older watches are mega-moneypits / frankenwatch magnets do you have any recommendations on a watch/movement that has the older style but is new/tested enough to pass these kind of concerns (knowing any watch carries risks)? I am not a fan of the modern watches and my budget would be $1,000 or less most likely. A tall order i know. But would love suggestions. Thanks!

*If this helps at all with the watch styles i enjoy my daily wear is either a Rado Integral (vintage style with the gold ceramic band), or a rectangular Champaign dial Omega Seamaster with a 1430 movement - Have a birthday coming up in a few months so i thought i would start looking for something for myself 😀
 
Posts
12,741
Likes
17,249
You have a bit of an issue here, as the cost of servicing of mechanical watches (without parts, of course) isn’t a lot different, whether a $100, $1,000 or $10,000 vintage mechanical watch. Most run on the same principles and have similar parts. Complications (automatic, calendar, chronographs, etc.) add costs.

So as you move down the cost scale, the percentage of original cost it takes to make a watch a daily wearer rises dramatically.

Would you consider a modern lower cost watch that is styled like a vintage? You might want to look at Dan Henry. Some models are quartz and some are mechanical.

Just a thought in a different direction than you may have originally considered.
gatorcpa
 
Posts
16
Likes
1
You have a bit of an issue here, as the cost of servicing of mechanical watches (without parts, of course) isn’t a lot different, whether a $100, $1,000 or $10,000 vintage mechanical watch. Most run on the same principles and have similar parts. Complications (automatic, calendar, chronographs, etc.) add costs.

So as you move down the cost scale, the percentage of original cost it takes to make a watch a daily wearer rises dramatically.

Would you consider a modern lower cost watch that is styled like a vintage? You might want to look at Dan Henry. Some models are quartz and some are mechanical.

Just a thought in a different direction than you may have originally considered.
gatorcpa

That makes sense I had not thought about it that way, i had thought a service and done for X years , but in talking to a friend further he pointed out i had not considered the wear on remaining parts and essentially an ongoing dependency with fewer parts over time.

I would consider a modern watch with a more vintage look, I am just not a fan of the larger overly ornate/colored watches. Ill take a look at the Dan Henry watches and others like it. Thanks!
 
Posts
21,639
Likes
49,022
A modern vintage-style watch is certainly a good option. However, if you are truly drawn to vintage watches, I wouldn't let the idea of maintenance dissuade you. However, I would definitely invest in a quality vintage watch that is worth the investment, and that includes avoiding gold-plated/filled cases for daily wear. For a few hundred more, you can get something with a solid stainless steel case that was really made to last.
 
Posts
8,066
Likes
57,995
I like my Dan Henry watches. Very stylish and wears easily on the wrist.

I have a few Quartz and one mechanical Dive watch. Excellent.
 
Posts
612
Likes
915
I'd echo what Dan has said - don't let it put you off going vintage, just make sure you choose something that's worth investing in from a service point of view. Modern mechanical watches have to be serviced too, you just get a head start.

If you go modern take a look at baltic watches too - vintage looks with modern internals.