Omega BOR bracelet guide

Posts
2,830
Likes
9,170
Wrong style- you need the 7-row.
To the best of my knowledge, this is false. They were sold side-by-side. Many collectors just prefer the look of the 7 row, but the 5-row are also correct for the dog-leg Constellations.

But @ConElPueblo would definitely know more.
 
Posts
124
Likes
14
Does this look right?
img_9287-jpg.825832
 
Posts
9,595
Likes
27,672
To the best of my knowledge, this is false. They were sold side-by-side. Many collectors just prefer the look of the 7 row, but the 5-row are also correct for the dog-leg Constellations.

But @ConElPueblo would definitely know more.

Yeah, as far as I know there isn't a definitive guide on which goes with what; my personal preference is to pair the five row BoR bracelets with the Constellations featuring rounded lugs such as all the bumper and cal 50X versions and 143XX. On the ones with angular lugs or with hidden crowns I find the seven row version far better looking, the more facetted design matching the case design of those references.
 
Posts
16,307
Likes
44,936
To the best of my knowledge, this is false. They were sold side-by-side. Many collectors just prefer the look of the 7 row, but the 5-row are also correct for the dog-leg Constellations.

But @ConElPueblo would definitely know more.
Then bracelet in question has the 512 endlinks- they will “fit” on a dog-leg but are not correct- they will bulge over the top of strait sides. That’s what I was suggesting.
 
Posts
622
Likes
996
Yeah, as far as I know there isn't a definitive guide on which goes with what

Not yet anyway....

They were sold side-by-side. Many collectors just prefer the look of the 7 row, but the 5-row are also correct for the dog-leg Constellations.

This is a point which I am unsure of, I have never seen a 5 row bracelet which I consider to be original on a dog leg connie. However, they were sold together as accessories, so I suppose it is possible, but I don't think likely with the fitment issues.

Then bracelet in question has the 512 endlinks- they will “fit” on a dog-leg but are not correct- they will bulge over the top of strait sides. That’s what I was suggesting.

This is also what I have observed from all of the 5 row BoR endlinks. I have also seen dog leg constellations on #50 endlinks and 8260 bracelet, but these are few and far between.

There is a great essay here on the various bracelets with Constellations for further reading: http://users.tpg.com.au/mondodec//Omega_Constellation_Accessories_Part_2.pdf
 
Posts
464
Likes
715
Hi all,

I’ve seen different mark on clasp for 1503 bracelet.

some have 1503 and “N.12” marks but some doesn’t have the “N.12” mark, only 1503.

I’m confident both are genuine, but I may be wrong.

Any idea of the reason? Year, manufacturer?

thanks for your help
 
Posts
464
Likes
715
No idea why some have a number 12, some other don’t? 😀
 
Posts
241
Likes
404
No idea why some have a number 12, some other don’t? 😀

Me too, but I was scared to ask. These circled numbers are fond on many bracelets, and it happens that the same code of bracelet has different No.