Of all seamaster’s out there, which one is best rival to the submariner?

Posts
1,437
Likes
2,208
Is that meant to be a compliment for a dive watch?

On the sunny side of the reef?

Just find that natural light and especially sunlight bring out the tropical dial and the contrasts of that aged lume, faceted hands and mix of brushed and polished surfaces.
 
Posts
639
Likes
3,065
I have one sub and three Seamasters. The quartz one I won't mention but my cal 2500 is a lovely watch and the nearest modern comparison to the sub for me. Non of them stand up against the simple beauty of my S300 however.
 
Posts
429
Likes
605
For me, I think the LMLE is the perfect Seamaster, and one that rivals even the modern Submariners on a technical standpoint, while offering a more interesting design proposition.

Omega-Seamaster-Planet-Ocean_liquidmetal-main.jpg
Agree completely. I have both the "standard" and the LE 2500 PO and think they're incredible values. I am supposed to be getting a no-date Sub from my AD "soon" so we'll see how I feel after that. I had an older Sub 14060, but it really underwhelmed me for the price compared to the PO.
 
Posts
9,217
Likes
24,050
I didn't catch if Vintage was in or not. If it is, pre-bond is my fav...


Otherwise, can't go wrong with a 42mm PO...

 
Posts
16,741
Likes
47,363
All modern Seamasters are available in a boutique
No modern Subs are available in a boutique

So any Modern Seamaster really
 
Posts
1,579
Likes
5,081
I think i said it too often already, but i will say it again, for me the 2254 is the most preferable watch and if i had to give other ones up, that would be my choice for my only watch at the moment.
Therefore i would vote for 2254!
 
Posts
40
Likes
48
Yes, all of them are great competitors. Omega is much more innovative in coming up with a few designs vs. just the submariner model (or even just the yatchmaster).
 
Posts
57
Likes
141
Any of the Seamaster 300 Professionals. Long lineage (despite the sabbatical in the 80's), increasingly recognisable design, versatile and a staple of the Seamaster lineup. I'd say its pound for pound the perfect alternative to a Submariner... or should I say, the Submariner is a perfect alternative to the 300SMP?😉
 
Posts
12
Likes
3
For me, I think the LMLE is the perfect Seamaster, and one that rivals even the modern Submariners on a technical standpoint, while offering a more interesting design proposition.

Omega-Seamaster-Planet-Ocean_liquidmetal-main.jpg

I just made a post somewhere that said I had never seen a Planet Ocean (PO) that I liked. Then I saw this post. That's the only PO face that I like.

I am not being mean though. As always, life would be so different if we all liked the same things. As long as folk love their PO, then that's all that matters.

Am looking at a (2018 model) Seamaster 300M Pro, myself.
Edited:
 
Posts
107
Likes
565
For me, I think the LMLE is the perfect Seamaster, and one that rivals even the modern Submariners on a technical standpoint, while offering a more interesting design proposition.

Omega-Seamaster-Planet-Ocean_liquidmetal-main.jpg
😉


 
Posts
667
Likes
1,213
I just made a post somewhere that said I had never seen a Planet Ocean (PO) that I liked. Then I saw this post. That's the only PO face that I like.

I am not being mean though. As always, life would be so different if we all liked the same things. As long as folk love their PO, then that's all that matters.

+1 😉

qKMxPI8l.jpg
 
Posts
278
Likes
2,438
For me, I think the LMLE is the perfect Seamaster, and one that rivals even the modern Submariners on a technical standpoint, while offering a more interesting design proposition.

Omega-Seamaster-Planet-Ocean_liquidmetal-main.jpg

I agree. Love my PO LMLE. It is a great watch
 
Posts
2,808
Likes
8,338
I think that my POLMLE and my blue Ti Planet Ocean 8500 are the closest competitors to the SubC (the 8500 and 8900 in steel are too top heavy, and the grey Ti 8900 is not as classy). Oh teh Bling!

The competition...
 
Posts
168
Likes
114
I used to dive a lot, like at least 2,3 dives a week for many years, and I will say Rolex has a history with divers, especially pro diver that no other brand will ever have. I have seen tons op divers dive with reflex as backup, I don’t think I have ever met someone with a seas master. Of course, I never made a point to check out other people watch when diving, and it is possible that I mostly noticed people with Rolex. Seiko is also a popular brand you see a lot around divers. Keep in mind that divers rely primarily on their dive computers. A mechanical Watch is really there for back up.
 
Posts
1,839
Likes
9,108
One more vote for the 2254, fantastic looking and wearing watch.
 
Posts
9,073
Likes
47,176
AND it looks better with a suit than the Sub, too ...
 
Posts
349
Likes
227
I used to dive a lot, like at least 2,3 dives a week for many years, and I will say Rolex has a history with divers, especially pro diver that no other brand will ever have. I have seen tons op divers dive with reflex as backup, I don’t think I have ever met someone with a seas master. Of course, I never made a point to check out other people watch when diving, and it is possible that I mostly noticed people with Rolex. Seiko is also a popular brand you see a lot around divers. Keep in mind that divers rely primarily on their dive computers. A mechanical Watch is really there for back up.

FWIW, I dove with a 2254.50 backup for a few years before switching to a doxa sub. Most other divers thought I was nuts for even wearing a wristwatch diving given all the modern digital alternatives 😉