New to watch collection - first two Omega watches & a conundrum!

Posts
3
Likes
1
hi all,

I am new to watch collection and am very glad to have found this forum, it is such great source of knowledge with so many helpful members!

I have so far acquired a new De Vile Prestige and a pre-owned 2531.80 first gen Seamaster Professional 300M, made in 1999. Also got a ladies' quartz De Ville (the one worn by Naomie Harris in No Time to Die) on order for the missus as a surprise present.... Happy spouse happy house and need to bribe her to get into this hobby 😀.

I got the De Villes because my parents each got one when they married so I thought it would be fitting for the missus and myself to get one each. I will use my De Ville for dressier occasions (like twice a year if I am lucky) and the missus can use hers as a daily driver (it is so much easier for ladies to daily drive dressy watches than men!). It is such a beautiful watch, simplicity and elegance are its best features, but seems very fragile.

I came across the 2531.80 by chance and got it at a pretty decent price, considering the condition of the watch (but no papers and box). My intention is to put it on a Nato strap and daily drive. HOWEVER - just as I was handing over my money for the 2531.80 tonight, I asked (and should not have!) about a mint condition 210.30.42.20.03.001 SMP 300M (let's call it 4th gen for the purpose of this post), the latest and greatest 'sub killer', in the shop's display cabinet. The shop keeper disclosed his 'last price' (which, in this environment can always be further negotiated) that is only USD1,200 more than the 2531.80, and it comes with box and full paperwork. I didn't bother to find out how old the watch is, as even the oldest example now wouldn't be more than 3 years.

Now the conundrum is - should I try and pay the difference of USD1,200 to trade-back my 2531.80 and 'upgrade' to the 4th gen? USD1,200 seems to be too good of a deal to upgrade to a watch that is 3 generations and at least 19 years newer, not to mention the box, paperwork and balance of official warranty.

That being said, there are things that I like about the 2531.80:

- much thinner and lighter compared to the 4th gen

- I actual prefer the looks of 2531.80, I find the 4th gen too flashy (in fact, I like the looks of the 2nd gen most, it has the best of both new and old aesthetics)

- looks dressier than the 4th gen, which suits my work environment better, as I wear smart casual and semi-formal 90% of the time. I think I might even get away with pairing it with a suit, which I cannot see as a feasible solution with the 4th gen (unless the black dial version).

- it is cheaper, so if I scratch it while daily driving, I won't cry as much

- the value of 2531.80 seems to be appreciating, The 4th gen's value will probably drop over the next few years after new model releases, until it picks up again many years later. Whereas the 2531.80 has already been through that depreciation cycle and is now on an upward trajectory as a semi vintage model.

- in terms of historic significance and collectability, I think the 2531.80 trumps the 4th gen, there can only be a first 'Omega Bond watch' model (let's just ignore for a moment the fact that the first on-screen version was a quartz). But newer and greater models of the OMP 300M will keep on coming, one replacing the other

What do you think? Should I 'upgrade' by paying the extra USD1,200 ? My heart wants to stay with the 2531.80, but the value equation just seems too good to be ignored... even my wife (who still doesn't know I have ordered a De Ville for her😝) questions why I didn't just get the newer one

Comments and views welcome!
 
Posts
1,907
Likes
9,234
2531 all the way IMO
.... and it seems you like it better anyhow
 
Posts
3
Likes
1
Thanks guys for the response! 😀

Another quick question - should the bezel pearl and hands on the 2531 have different lumination colours to that of the hour markers? Mine all appear to be the same (green glow), but I have seen Youtube videos showing different colours for the pearl/hands vs. hour markers. I thoroughly checked the 2531 before buying and am pretty confident it is legit. It is also the later superluminova version
 
Posts
2,537
Likes
3,397
Thanks guys for the response! 😀

Another quick question - should the bezel pearl and hands on the 2531 have different lumination colours to that of the hour markers? Mine all appear to be the same (green glow), but I have seen Youtube videos showing different colours for the pearl/hands vs. hour markers. I thoroughly checked the 2531 before buying and am pretty confident it is legit. It is also the later superluminova version

Your watch will have the same lume (green) for all markers and hands and pip. Omega did not start changing the lume colors to making the minute hand and pip green with the rest blue until 2014 or so.

Thus, your watch is fine. I actually prefer the all-green lume to the bi-color, and I also prefer the green over the blue -- eyes can pick up green in the dark easier than blue. I don't know why they went to blue (other than to copy Rolex).
 
Posts
72
Likes
91
I was in the same situation a while back. I bought an SMP Quartz 10 years ago, but always desired the newer version. So I ended up selling the quartz and buying the newer version with no regrets.
To me, the newer version is just better all around than the old.
 
Posts
183
Likes
206
I note you haven’t listed a single thing about the 2018 300M that you prefer over the 2531.80, that should tell you something
Having said that you can wear either one with a suit or even a tux. Check out Pierce Brosnan as Bond wearing the 2531 and Daniel Craig in a tux wearing the latest model. I actually think that the new one on rubber looks amazing with a suit. Oh and I own the 2531.80 and want to also own the newer version (it’s too large for my thin wrists).

 
Posts
5,636
Likes
5,793
Thanks guys for the response! 😀

Another quick question - should the bezel pearl and hands on the 2531 have different lumination colours to that of the hour markers? Mine all appear to be the same (green glow), but I have seen Youtube videos showing different colours for the pearl/hands vs. hour markers. I thoroughly checked the 2531 before buying and am pretty confident it is legit. It is also the later superluminova version
Too many variables to say. Just about anything is possible.
 
Posts
1,512
Likes
2,589
I have the 2018 model and am probably going to pick up a 2531.80 at some point. It's a beautiful watch. The short handset has been something that has bothered me with that model though.
 
Posts
1,525
Likes
2,927
This is a good conundrum to have, OP.

The way I see it, it's a case of head vs heart. The head says go with the newer one because of the price/value for money and newer tech. The heart says go with the 2531 because it's a classic and I love the look. Both watches will pretty much serve the same function.

In a perfect world, I'd get both! 😁
But seriously though, just get the one which truly speaks to you. Don't compromise or you'll regret it later.

Good luck with your decision!
 
Posts
109
Likes
126
I wouldn't worry about a De-Ville as a daily wearer. I wore a quartz one from 1987 to 1995 daily.
 
Posts
272
Likes
849
2531 and 2254 are Seamasters to have. Everything went downhill after that.
 
Posts
298
Likes
532
hi all,

I am new to watch collection and am very glad to have found this forum, it is such great source of knowledge with so many helpful members!

I have so far acquired a new De Vile Prestige and a pre-owned 2531.80 first gen Seamaster Professional 300M, made in 1999. Also got a ladies' quartz De Ville (the one worn by Naomie Harris in No Time to Die) on order for the missus as a surprise present.... Happy spouse happy house and need to bribe her to get into this hobby 😀.

I got the De Villes because my parents each got one when they married so I thought it would be fitting for the missus and myself to get one each. I will use my De Ville for dressier occasions (like twice a year if I am lucky) and the missus can use hers as a daily driver (it is so much easier for ladies to daily drive dressy watches than men!). It is such a beautiful watch, simplicity and elegance are its best features, but seems very fragile.

I came across the 2531.80 by chance and got it at a pretty decent price, considering the condition of the watch (but no papers and box). My intention is to put it on a Nato strap and daily drive. HOWEVER - just as I was handing over my money for the 2531.80 tonight, I asked (and should not have!) about a mint condition 210.30.42.20.03.001 SMP 300M (let's call it 4th gen for the purpose of this post), the latest and greatest 'sub killer', in the shop's display cabinet. The shop keeper disclosed his 'last price' (which, in this environment can always be further negotiated) that is only USD1,200 more than the 2531.80, and it comes with box and full paperwork. I didn't bother to find out how old the watch is, as even the oldest example now wouldn't be more than 3 years.

Now the conundrum is - should I try and pay the difference of USD1,200 to trade-back my 2531.80 and 'upgrade' to the 4th gen? USD1,200 seems to be too good of a deal to upgrade to a watch that is 3 generations and at least 19 years newer, not to mention the box, paperwork and balance of official warranty.

That being said, there are things that I like about the 2531.80:

- much thinner and lighter compared to the 4th gen

- I actual prefer the looks of 2531.80, I find the 4th gen too flashy (in fact, I like the looks of the 2nd gen most, it has the best of both new and old aesthetics)

- looks dressier than the 4th gen, which suits my work environment better, as I wear smart casual and semi-formal 90% of the time. I think I might even get away with pairing it with a suit, which I cannot see as a feasible solution with the 4th gen (unless the black dial version).

- it is cheaper, so if I scratch it while daily driving, I won't cry as much

- the value of 2531.80 seems to be appreciating, The 4th gen's value will probably drop over the next few years after new model releases, until it picks up again many years later. Whereas the 2531.80 has already been through that depreciation cycle and is now on an upward trajectory as a semi vintage model.

- in terms of historic significance and collectability, I think the 2531.80 trumps the 4th gen, there can only be a first 'Omega Bond watch' model (let's just ignore for a moment the fact that the first on-screen version was a quartz). But newer and greater models of the OMP 300M will keep on coming, one replacing the other

What do you think? Should I 'upgrade' by paying the extra USD1,200 ? My heart wants to stay with the 2531.80, but the value equation just seems too good to be ignored... even my wife (who still doesn't know I have ordered a De Ville for her😝) questions why I didn't just get the newer one

Comments and views welcome!

Sleep on it a few nights... the answer will come! (ps: I prefer the older one...!)
Edited:
 
Posts
120
Likes
173
Keep the earlier one. You are using emotive language to talk about it. You are using rational language to describe your fomo of the ‘deal’.
You already have the deal!
 
Posts
3
Likes
1
Thanks guys for your insight and sharing your personal experience... the more time I spend with the 2531 on my wrist, the more I like it. I cannot 'feel it' with the De Ville, but there just is something about the 2531. It certainly cannot surpass the value equation and technology of the 2018 300M, but if I am to wear something every day, it has to be chosen by the heart, not the head...

I have made my decision to keep the 2531. Thank you all and glad to be part of this community!


Keep the earlier one. You are using emotive language to talk about it. You are using rational language to describe your fomo of the ‘deal’.
You already have the deal!

Shut up. Just shut up. You had me at "emotive."🥰