I
think the 2541 was produced until the 1997 changeover from Tritium to superluminova. I think. These appear to be luminova, regardless. Tagging
@padders , who knows a heck of a lot about this reference
I know the successor 2221 quartz was produced after (and has red text and applied markers) and is SL only
And, I know that in some cases the tritium hands on these early Bond seamasters would age to a superluminova-like off-green (while the markers would age to yellow or pumpkin).
Replacement dials or not would not impact my decision to purchase one of these watches in the 2K range.
I agree the first one appears to have been clearly refinished. Not.. I'm not a fan. The second one probably has been polished but at a basic glance, looks better
@gramboda we are pretty big on pictures here because links very often break after sales are completed and it allows us to have a record of conversation with pictures for other people's reference. Are you on mobile or desktop?
Good choice on this reference. If you are on a budget and don't want to pay for an expensive mechanical service, quartz may be the way to go. I don't think you can go wrong either way, the first Bond Omega was a quartz after all!
That said... omega's quartz movements are not anything special to write home about (the thermo-compensated ones being something of an exception). My coaxial Seamaster keeps time as accurately--- iirc omega rated them ~0.5- ~0.7 sec/day.
You can buy a radio-controlled citizen for under 200 that will keep perfectly accurate time, and not have to worry about a "battery" replacement for at least a decade and likely longer- while the seamaster battery will last about 3 years.
If it is at all about the technology to you, something to keep in mind. If it isn't and you just want a golden eye seamaster, it's a good choice