Need your opinion about this omega ref.2913-1

Posts
7,554
Likes
34,642
Im not in the market for an early SM300 and I recall watching the last few minutes of that auction and having to sit on my hands to stop throwing a bid in.

Worth at least double IMHO
 
Posts
825
Likes
1,801
Worth at least double IMHO

As I mentioned that’s not been a very rare result. Some deals to be found in that range.
 
Posts
7,554
Likes
34,642
As I mentioned that’s not been a very rare result. Some deals to be found in that range.

Well I'm going to come out of my self-imposed abstinence and start loading up on these....one things for sure they ain't making them anymore and it is a classic early reference. Just look at the prices of the other 291x trinity ref's of rail, sea and speed!
 
Posts
2,056
Likes
4,188
Great, first we had the hodinkee-effect, now it'll be the cristos-effect! lol
 
Posts
1,853
Likes
3,591
Though it was nice I would venture to say that was bit optimistic on the pricing.. but I guess it did sell.

The market is fairly soft on these and you can find a 2913-3 or similar typically for about a quarter of that if you keep your eyes peeled.
You’re right, but -3’s are fairly common, -1’s are seriously rare, less than 20 currently known, far rarer than a 2915-1 or 2914-1.
 
Posts
825
Likes
1,801
You’re right, but -3’s are fairly common, -1’s are seriously rare, less than 20 currently known, far rarer than a 2915-1 or 2914-1.
I defer to the master.. hopefully we will see it again.
 
Posts
18
Likes
8
It’s the 1958-59 Omega Seamaster 300
Ref: 2913-1. The Movement number was 15,706,XXX with caliber 501 (20 jewels).

In my opinion.
Dial: Original “Swiss Made” dial.
Hands: Original "Broad Arrow" hands, with some corrosion
Crown: Original signed Omega flatfeet crown





I think the movement serial number is from 1957. The first series of the Seamaster 300.


I can always be wrong.
 
Posts
7,554
Likes
34,642
You’re right, but -3’s are fairly common, -1’s are seriously rare, less than 20 currently known, far rarer than a 2915-1 or 2914-1.

Wow, less than 20, I didn't have a clue that they were so few and far between!......How's it going with the book, any updates at all?
 
Posts
1,853
Likes
3,591
Wow, less than 20, I didn't have a clue that they were so few and far between!......How's it going with the book, any updates at all?
It’s going very well thank you. We’ve made great progress and a lot of the work is completed, although there’s still plenty more to get to the finish line. Some interesting new facts have come to light as well…
 
Posts
12,090
Likes
20,991
Can’t wait for the Seamaster book.

Any updates on a potential release date Ash or are you avoiding setting any ‘deadlines’ for now?
 
Posts
7,554
Likes
34,642
It’s going very well thank you. We’ve made great progress and a lot of the work is completed, although there’s still plenty more to get to the finish line. Some interesting new facts have come to light as well…

That's good to hear! Any ideas regarding a publishing date....I think I speak for many when I say I'm dying to order my copy.
 
Posts
860
Likes
2,355
That's good to hear! Any ideas regarding a publishing date....I think I speak for many when I say I'm dying to order my copy.

Lets just hope not on GRRM Game of Thrones timeline😉
 
Posts
1,853
Likes
3,591
That's good to hear! Any ideas regarding a publishing date....I think I speak for many when I say I'm dying to order my copy.
No date yet, but we’d like to get it out asap. Thanks for the support.
 
Posts
18
Likes
8
Hello all members,

I would like to request for the comments from many experts here in this forum’s.

First of all, I have a little knowledge about this uncommon watch.
Please shed some light on this watch which I have the chance to buy it, if the price is not the main thing.

It’s the 1958-59 Omega Seamaster 300
Ref: 2913-1. The Movement number was 15,706,XXX with caliber 501 (20 jewels).

In my opinion.
Dial: Original “Swiss Made” dial.
Hands: Original "Broad Arrow" hands, with some corrosion
Crown: Original signed Omega flatfeet crown
Bezel: The bezel insert was gone
Movement: Original Omega Cal 501 (20 jewels)
Bracelet: Original 7077 with endlink no.6


More closeup photos:


Thank you for sharing your advice with me.
Teerapat




In your opinion, this effect on the dial is not due to the application of the lacquer.
Hello all members,

I would like to request for the comments from many experts here in this forum’s.

First of all, I have a little knowledge about this uncommon watch.
Please shed some light on this watch which I have the chance to buy it, if the price is not the main thing.

It’s the 1958-59 Omega Seamaster 300
Ref: 2913-1. The Movement number was 15,706,XXX with caliber 501 (20 jewels).

In my opinion.
Dial: Original “Swiss Made” dial.
Hands: Original "Broad Arrow" hands, with some corrosion
Crown: Original signed Omega flatfeet crown
Bezel: The bezel insert was gone
Movement: Original Omega Cal 501 (20 jewels)
Bracelet: Original 7077 with endlink no.6


More closeup photos:


Thank you for sharing your advice with me.
Teerapat



In your opinion, this effect on the dial is not due to the application of the lacquer?

Best regards
Gi