need some help identifying markings

Posts
288
Likes
685
very strange. when i out my serial number in the site it comes up as it was probably made march of 1969 and it has a 145.022-68TRANSITIONAL caliber 861, but it obviously doesn't. any idea why the information is so different?
I think you should also be aware the dial and handset appear to be service parts. Meaning they don’t appear original to the watch.
 
Posts
24,246
Likes
53,992
very strange. when i out my serial number in the site it comes up as it was probably made march of 1969 and it has a 145.022-68TRANSITIONAL caliber 861, but it obviously doesn't. any idea why the information is so different?
Perhaps you are mis-reading the serial number.
 
Posts
12
Likes
2
I think you should also be aware the dial and handset appear to be service parts. Meaning they don’t appear original to the watch.
how can you tell?
 
Posts
2,702
Likes
3,599
how can you tell?
Because there is no patina on the markers or hands and the dial reads “Swiss Made” not “T Swiss Made T”. It also isn’t a step dial, which the original one would be.
 
Posts
13,199
Likes
22,953
Unfortunately it appears to be a frankenwatch.

You have a 27m movement that is too late for the -66 CB case and caseback, along with a service dial.
 
Posts
288
Likes
685
how
Because there is no patina on the markers or hands and the dial reads “Swiss Made” not “T Swiss Made T”. It also isn’t a step dial, which the original one would be.
Exactly

Unfortunately it appears to be a frankenwatch.

You have a 27m movement that is too late for the -66 CB case and caseback, along with a service dial.
I was thinking the same thing…
 
Posts
12
Likes
2
I was thinking the same thing…
really disappointing. i guess only paying 2k for it makes more sense. i do still like the watch and it looks great on the wrist. and keeps good time.