It would be a surprise if a member with knowledge would make a effort to answer your question. You should post pictures of the watches and all the relevant info. And then your own thoughts about the watch. Maybe start a seperate thread.
Thank you, appreciate the advice.
Movement number and ref. on the inner side of the case back match (165.027 / caliber 552). Watch has been serviced.
Lume on the dial seems faded to a yellowish color, not reapplied, looks original to me, in a very good condition.
Hands are ok, as well. The bezel looks also original including the pearl in the middle, but heavily damaged. Bezel does not rotate. Plexi is not original. The case looks really clean, the case back too with the seahorse logo, which look original.
In overall, this watch looks too clean for a 60 year old watch. What do you think? I'm waiting for photos to check the notch on the sides.
And I have this 2nd option, below. Movement number and ref. on the inner side of the case back match (166.027 / caliber 565). The case, case back, inner side of case back, and movement is original based on the photos I saw. Lume dot on the bezel is reapplied, not too nice. Bezel looks original and is a relatively good condition. Lume on the dial and hands are faded, dirty-ish, but perhaps considering the age of the watch it's ok. Colors on the dial and hands match. However, the "Omega automatic" and the "Seamaster 120" text looks too brigh/white on the dial compared to the aged lume on the dial, perhaps reapplied, a bit off I would say. May I have your opinion please about the dial?
Thank you !
