Fake strap and buckle too.

 

Thanks! This helped me not buy a fake.

 

Let’s see a pic of your 120.

 

What do you guys think? I believe it to be the best one I have seen. I'll be listing it for sale today. No flaws I can see on the dial.

 

Never sold on that bracelet

 

Thanks I will include that info in the listing. For some reason i can't upload pics but I will put lots in the listing.

 

Is'nt that bor 18mm?

 

More pics. I appreciate your critique so I can have an informed sales listing.

 

A

ur BOR braceLet seems tO have 18mm endLInks .... the lug width of the 120 is 19mm ..
. would help ur sale pst if u set ur camera to .... MICRO .. get up close to the ... MARKERS AND LUME ... also upclose to the .... BEZEL .. also if the crystal has ... Omega LOGO

 

Looks pretty good to me. Hard to say more without a close up of the dial but it certainly looks clean.

 

Wait, I was told mine was a 120

 

This would be a late 120 from the 90s (ish). The watches that this thread is concerned with were made in the mid to late 60s and early 70s.

 

@connieseamaster Oh, I see thank you.

 

For a minute I thought you were telling the japenney his was from the 90s. It looks very nice to me. I can't say it's the BEST with the missing pip, but the patina and dial are very nice and warm. Bezel, hands, crown look original to me. The bracelet is neither here nor there unless you list it as original. In the current market it could fetch 2500 ish for just the head.

 

I appreciate the input on the originality.

 

First time poster to OF. This is a super helpful and informative thread, which I am only about two years late reading. Nonetheless, is it possible to replace a missing lume pip? If so, how does one do that?

 

Hi guys, I have recently taken the plunge on this piece here:

https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Diver-O...=true&nordt=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557Purchases made through these links may earn this site a commission from the eBay Partner Network

I have only just seen this thread and now I have some alarm bells ringing - namely the ref on case back (165.0002) and the condition of the bezel... Does anyone with more experienced eyes see any red flags?

 

Yes, I see red flags. I dont believe that bezel is original to the watch. But the caseback is fine. You only dont see the 7. it's probably saying: 165.00027

 

And maybe it's better to start a seperate thread for more opinions. And next time please post pictures iso a link. Thnx

 

This thread is very helpful. The 120 has been on my list for a while so the more info the better, including bad back jobs and fake/remakes to known how to spot the red flags