My Early Seamaster 120 Divers. What to look for and what to avoid.

Posts
13,434
Likes
31,589
In order to help others avoid buying fakes, here's another replica Seamaster 120 kit available on eBay, this time with the Afghan military marking. It even has the Omega logo etched into the crystal.

I contacted the seller and he admitted the kit was a replica.

https://rover.ebay.com/rover/0/0/0?mpre=https://www.ebay.co.uk/ulk/itm/263948642844

I only have use of my mobile phone today so it might be useful if another member could post some photos from the listing as reference material.

Reported.
 
This website may earn commission from Ebay sales.
Posts
13,434
Likes
31,589
Does the 120 have a clicking bezel?

Mine rotates but doesn't click. I'm not sure if it's missing a part or that's just how they are.

There are no clicks on these, just a retainer spring holding the bezel to the case.
 
Posts
2,853
Likes
15,375
Does the 120 have a clicking bezel?

Mine rotates but doesn't click. I'm not sure if it's missing a part or that's just how they are.

120 bezel for both automatic and manual wind versions is ... NON CLICK [friction mounted] ... bi directional
 
Posts
6,715
Likes
21,672
120 bezel for both automatic and manual wind versions is ... NON CLICK [friction mounted] ... bi directional

 
Posts
209
Likes
186
Hello,
Can anyone give me their assessment of this 120, the condition is excellent which immediately make me think redial, etc. any help would be appreciated.
 
Posts
2,853
Likes
15,375
Hello,
Can anyone give me their assessment of this 120, the condition is excellent which immediately make me think redial, etc. any help would be appreciated.

FAKE .... here are some details that might help ... original parts
Edited:
 
Posts
209
Likes
186
FAKE .... here are some details that might help ... original parts

Thank you

I see the lume pit is different, the case back and under the case back. The movement looks original.

I have a lot more research to do, if I want to find a decent example but what screamed fake to you?
 
Posts
1,058
Likes
1,630
+1 typical fake
Check:
- fake shiny bezel, wrong lume pit, 120 instead of 144 dents.
- dial print should be whiter
- Royal Afghan Airforce caseback is different (seamaster is not centered)
- different case
 
Posts
209
Likes
186
Thank you

I see the lume pit is different, the case back and under the case back. The movement looks original.

I have a lot more research to do, if I want to find a decent example but what screamed fake to you?
+1 typical fake
Check:
- fake shiny bezel, wrong lume pit, 120 instead of 144 dents.
- dial print should be whiter
- Royal Afghan Airforce caseback is different (seamaster is not centered)
- different case


All great info for someone who is trying to navigate through all the crap out there.

When you say 120 instead of 144 dents, what does that mean.
 
Posts
209
Likes
186
How about this one, the seller responded and explained to me that it was purchased from Jack Wongs vintage collection and is 100% original
 
Posts
209
Likes
186
it looks good ...

How about the movement, it looks like it says 513 instead of 613. Any clue why that would be?
 
Posts
2,853
Likes
15,375
thats the issue on Jack Wongs post the numbers don't match ... on the serial number dates it from
1973 ... watch was made in the 60's and she\oud have a 600 series ref mvmnt
 
Posts
209
Likes
186
thats the issue on Jack Wongs post the numbers don't match ... on the serial number dates it from
1973 ... watch was made in the 60's and she\oud have a 600 series ref mvmnt


I agree with the above, it seems like he is confused and the # on the movement is concerning along with the prestige bezel.

I was looking at the one you posted and was seriously considering it.

What about this one, no date but the condition looks good.

https://www.chrono24.com/omega/seamaster-120-vintage--id7935365.htm
 
Posts
2,853
Likes
15,375
I agree with the above, it seems like he is confused and the # on the movement is concerning along with the prestige bezel.

I was looking at the one you posted and was seriously considering it.

What about this one, no date but the condition looks good.

https://www.chrono24.com/omega/seamaster-120-vintage--id7935365.htm


CROWN is not correct, I don't trust the case back , mvmnt shud be cal 601 ........ Omega launched the Seamaster 120 in 1966 ...... and the ad says it's from 1962 ?