Forums Latest Members

My Early Seamaster 120 Divers. What to look for and what to avoid.

  1. COYI Mar 31, 2018

    Posts
    496
    Likes
    723
    Yes, no problem with white date background
    412489-6aa79dff38e557e5246a198ac347aa47.jpg
     
    hmmmcamu likes this.
  2. OmegaNewbie1987 Mar 31, 2018

    Posts
    4
    Likes
    0
    Ok thank you. So potentially just the sweeping hand. I will go check it out again and look for the notches and ask to see the movement.
     
  3. Kippy Apr 8, 2018

    Posts
    43
    Likes
    24
    SCAMMED
    Great and informative Article above! Sadly though, reading it made me realise that a few months ago I bought (from Ron of Timely Classics in Dallas Texas) a blatant FAKE 120. I have written to him about this but been flatly ignored. Oh well my fault I guess for not doing my homework ... there goes +-USD1695 down the drain - he even placed a genuine Omega movement and crystal in and on the fake case and dial - how very "clever" of him! I have reported him to NAWCC for what it is worth ... "sigh" you live and you learn ...
     
    marco, hmmmcamu and gemini4 like this.
  4. hmmmcamu Apr 8, 2018

    Posts
    2,531
    Likes
    13,317
    really very sorry to hear that ....
     
  5. airansun In the shuffling madness Apr 8, 2018

    Posts
    2,520
    Likes
    17,674
    Amazing, mind spinning thread! Very valuable! Yay OF!
     
    hmmmcamu likes this.
  6. Maganator Apr 17, 2018

    Posts
    1,170
    Likes
    1,728
    Anyone got any views on this one? Seems to be the slightly rarer 166.027 with lumed second hand.

    My concern is that the lume on the dial shows signs of deterioration - but the bezel (apart from lume pip) looks in pretty good condition - that's a bit of a red flag for me (should it be?). The engraving on the case back has also been completely polished away as well. Though the engraving on these was pretty shallow in the first place. Crown seems fine and the case has the 3 & 9 notches. I understand black numerals on a white wheel is ok for this ref.

    I thought I had these 120s pretty sussed out but something just seems odd with this one. Any advice would be appreciated.
    Many thanks
    omega 120.jpg omega 120. 1.jpg omega 120. 2.jpg omega 120. 3.jpg
     
  7. Davidt Apr 17, 2018

    Posts
    10,399
    Likes
    18,075
    I think it's correct and largely original but the lume would put me off.

    I've got one of these on its way to STS at the minute for a full refurb. I think they're lovely watches but I'd wait for better lume.
     
    Maganator likes this.
  8. hmmmcamu Apr 17, 2018

    Posts
    2,531
    Likes
    13,317
    second sweep hand is not appropriate for watch ........dial is in bad shape ... but also legit .... bezel seems appropriate and good condition case back is polished ..... dials do pop up now and then ...
     
    Edited Apr 17, 2018
    Maganator likes this.
  9. Maganator Apr 18, 2018

    Posts
    1,170
    Likes
    1,728
    Mike H, sonicosa and hmmmcamu like this.
  10. hmmmcamu Apr 18, 2018

    Posts
    2,531
    Likes
    13,317
    Bezel is LEGIT ....
     
  11. hmmmcamu Apr 18, 2018

    Posts
    2,531
    Likes
    13,317
    as for the Second sweep hand .... I am not sure ... based on the link u shared ... i can only go by these VINTAGE ADVERTS .....where there other 120's with the second sweep hand mounted on the 120 in ur photos ... seems there are .... wether these were the correct second sweep hands that came with the 120's originally, I would go by the advert photos below ... now are these hands Omega ... probably .... could be replacements attached to some 120's when they were sent in for a service ...... perhaps the original second sweep hand was unavailable at the time some 120's were sent in, and these were used as a substitute .... and that is why u see some pieces with these second sweep hands .... ???? ... remember back in the day a watch maker was able to order parts from Omega directly for a watch
     
    483220-3ed807e527f2352a9b14c4ae9ad4b08a.jpg 496109-17886bb11b28ca0a3d491e8dce4c7a20.jpg 496110-c619942925d131721fa60de6c0e4142b.jpg 166.024 fra dansk brochure primo 70'erne urmagerne dot dk .jpg 1969.jpg
    Edited Apr 19, 2018
    Syrte, pippy and Maganator like this.
  12. hmmmcamu Apr 24, 2018

    Posts
    2,531
    Likes
    13,317
    1967 Omega 120
     
    DSCN1343.jpg
  13. COYI May 3, 2018

    Posts
    496
    Likes
    723
    I've seen photos of a few Seamaster 120s with an orange seconds hand. Can anyone confirm whether these are correct or not? At first I dismissed it as an incorrect replacement but I've seen photos of at least three with this seconds hand. s-l400.jpg
     
    pmontoyap and pippy like this.
  14. hmmmcamu May 3, 2018

    Posts
    2,531
    Likes
    13,317

    these red second sweep hands were used on CHRONOSTOP and GENEVE models of the same era .... they are Omega hands ... BUT NOT ... WERE NOT ... used originally on this model 120 ...
     
  15. hmmmcamu May 3, 2018

    Posts
    2,531
    Likes
    13,317
    this is the CORRECT second sweep hand
     
    rare-omega-speedmaster-cal-321-pre-moon-1960s-ref-2915-2998-sweep-second-hand.jpeg
    marco likes this.
  16. atc100 May 19, 2018

    Posts
    265
    Likes
    1,202
    Hi guys, very nice thread, tnx for info.

    P.S. now I will have to get one::psy::

    What is realistic price for 165.027 in a good condition? Head only
     
  17. Davidt Jun 24, 2018

    Posts
    10,399
    Likes
    18,075
    Just back after a couple of months at STS. It's no show stopper as it's clearly been used. However, all the lume is original, it's keeping great time and it even passed its pressure test. The matte dial and bezel look brilliant in the sun!

    IMG_2523.JPG IMG_2526.JPG
     
    TNTwatch, pippy, 63TR4 and 2 others like this.
  18. hmmmcamu Jul 2, 2018

    Posts
    2,531
    Likes
    13,317
    1967 Omega 120
    Omega BOR bracelet ref# 12
    19mm endlnks ref# 026ST517
     
    DSCN2347.jpg DSCN2340.jpg DSCN2339.jpg
    Rman, TNTwatch, pippy and 3 others like this.
  19. bloomy Jul 3, 2018

    Posts
    299
    Likes
    582
    Here is my SM120

    Originally came on a 1067 bracelet dated 2/67, swapped for a tropic strap for now. I purchased with the intention of keeping the bracelet and flipping the watch but I enjoy it to much to let it go. Dial is stunning in natural light even though it is missing some lume on the dial. Bezel no longer turns, no big deal to me.

    Has the "unique" lumed second hand w/ lume color matching the dial, as seen under UV.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    TNTwatch likes this.
  20. pmontoyap Jul 3, 2018

    Posts
    482
    Likes
    938
    Here is my SM120 Ultraman

    E7B563B0-8019-437C-B517-06B829E46EFB.jpeg
     
    gemini4, shishy and TNTwatch like this.