Minute Repeater

Posts
9
Likes
21
So far, it’s only Journe whom i have read who makes MRs in steel cases. Supposedly sounds better in steel.

For reference...

The Journe:

Sounds like a guy hitting a nail into cement. Horrid. Seriously. This has to be one of the least pleasant repeaters on Earth.

A Patek:


Wonderfully musical. The gold standard for what good sounds like.

Both recorded by WatchBox with the same mic. Obviously the didn't level things well, but we aren't talking volume here, just quality of sound.

My point: Journe repeaters are literally one of, if not THE WORST sound repeaters ever made.

Now, I know what you are thinking. "The Patek is substantially more then the Journe. Of course it sounds better!"

Fine. The Journe has an RRP of $185,000 USD. Let's compare it to the IWC at a bargain basement price $86,000 (in gold, steel is even less):


You can also compare the far less expensive JLC's that also sound lovely above posted by Archer...
 
Posts
2,326
Likes
7,544
I agree that Patek is the gold standard for MRs.

I dont have a video but i think Vacheron also sounds well.
 
Posts
1,443
Likes
3,807
^ $790,000 at Christie’s HK Auction. Other MRs did quite well
 
Posts
6,860
Likes
12,903
5074 from the auction 🥰

That Patek Philippe Ref 2524/1 from 1955 is drop dead gorgeous. Challenged only by this style Vacheron Constantin from the same era. The very few minute repeaters produced in this time period were the apex of design, imo. Simple, but with exquisite mechanisms.
 
Posts
1,443
Likes
3,807
Vacheron is beautifully designed and (look at those lugs) massively underrated. The one brand of the holy trinity that has not achieved a similar market success
 
Posts
2,326
Likes
7,544
Wearing this one today. Told my eldest daughter how it works and why one was built to begin with.

she loved telling time just by the sound.
 
Posts
577
Likes
752
I once had a red gold one in my hands, it was at the IWC Collectors meeting in Sept 2002, Schaffhausen. I totally loved it , and at that time was still affordable. What kept me from buying it, was that all the interesting bits, i.e. the hammers and the repeater module designed by Claret, were actually positioned between the movement and the dial, rather than visible from the back. And am afraid that what is mesmerizing s not only the sound, but also the rhythm of movement of the hammers.
 
Posts
2,326
Likes
7,544
All things equal, would a grand sonnerie be cheaper than a minute repeater?
 
Posts
2,326
Likes
7,544
No.
The new PP GS is circa £1.1m, their MR Tourbillon Annual Calendar is circa £607k

though the 6301P is also a PS and an MR.

Is there a comparable GS only and MR only, same case material?
 
Posts
1,636
Likes
13,252
though the 6301P is also a PS and an MR.

Is there a comparable GS only and MR only, same case material?

There might well be but all of Patek’s Grand Complications are POA.

This is the model I was referring to in my last post and it’s a Perpetual Calendar not Annual like I said

 
Posts
302
Likes
569
interesting, where are the hammers located? Love the simplicity of the dial and case. Are you able to upload a vid? Absolutely love minute repeaters