- Posts
- 354
- Likes
- 769
Jeeper
·Nordwolf, how have you managed to upload METAS test results. If you let me know, I will add mine for comparison. Calibre 8912.
Jeeper
Jeeper
METAS results versus real world performance
- Posts
- 354
- Likes
- 769
Jeeper
·Apologies for bring up an old thread, but when I went in to see my watch's test results for the first time, a week ago, it showed me in depth each of the tests results, yet now it just seems to give me a summary. Anyone else noticed the same? Thanks
I can still open each test on a drop down tab for an explanation of the test.
Jeeper
- Posts
- 470
- Likes
- 526
Madjam1966
·
Yeah, me too, but I'm sure when I first found my results when I went to the drop-down arrow (against each test) it detailed more info, eg. showing all 6 rest positions and associated loss or gain for each. Now it shows the aggregated average. That's of course fine but the detailed results were really informative. I'm just puzzled why I can't see that level of detail anymore. The results I see now are similar to the screen shot Frank displayed, not broken down sub results.
This is what I get, but I was previously able to expand more of each test showing what the test entailed and further detailed info for my watch.
Edited:
- Posts
- 9,107
- Likes
- 47,567
gbesq
·My Globemaster’s caliber 8900 is averaging +4-5 spd which is consistent with its test results (+4.7 spd). That being said, the caliber 2500d in my SMPc is actually more accurate.
- Posts
- 354
- Likes
- 769
Jeeper
·Yeah, me too, but I'm sure when I first found my results when I went to the drop-down arrow (against each test) it detailed more info, eg. showing all 6 rest positions and associated loss or gain for each. Now it shows the aggregated average. That's of course fine but the detailed results were really informative. I'm just puzzled why I can't see that level of detail anymore. The results I see now are similar to the screen shot Frank displayed, not broken down sub results.
This is what I get, but I was previously able to expand more of each test showing what the test entailed and further detailed info for my watch.
Jeeper
- Posts
- 354
- Likes
- 769
Jeeper
·Yeah, me too, but I'm sure when I first found my results when I went to the drop-down arrow (against each test) it detailed more info, eg. showing all 6 rest positions and associated loss or gain for each. Now it shows the aggregated average. That's of course fine but the detailed results were really informative. I'm just puzzled why I can't see that level of detail anymore. The results I see now are similar to the screen shot Frank displayed, not broken down sub results.
This is what I get, but I was previously able to expand more of each test showing what the test entailed and further detailed info for my watch.
- Posts
- 470
- Likes
- 526
Madjam1966
·Madman. Sorry but how are you copying that info & inserting your your post. I would be happy to share my data. I find this particular thread very very interesting
I just did a screenshot of the page on my phone.
I'm puzzled why I can't find all data now.
Edited:
- Posts
- 5,044
- Likes
- 15,511
eugeneandresson
·Archer said:METAS doesn't set the standards like COSC does - they are the people checking that a manufacturer is living up to the standards that the manufacturer set for themselves. So if Omega can make the standard whatever they want it to be, so some timing tolerances are 0 to +5, some are 0 to +6, and some are 0 to +7 and all are Master Chronometer watches.
In the same way NASAs flight qualification on the 3861 watches can be done at Omega without the need to pull Jim Ragan out of retirement...
