Megan's Show & Tell. A Very Rare 16610

Posts
1,453
Likes
4,419
Every seen the price of an 861 movement Speedmaster with an applied metal logo from 68? Or a no NASA 145.022-71? Now add Submariner fetishism.
I may come across as an ass, but the Omegas I understand because they look different and have different dials. I'm ignorant about watch collecting, but do transitional models get any permiums? I am not aware of any 16800, 16660, etc. getting a signif lift.
Dials, case variants, bezels, paperwork&boxes add lift, not much for transitional movements. GMT Cal 1066 vs 1035? 1016 cal 1560 vs 1570 Hacking vs non-hacking? 1040 vs 1040B?

I was personally shown a watch which this happened to the last few metal bezel GMT Masters as well, which basically says that the upgrade to parachrome spring was not to do with ceramic bezels.
 
Posts
1,369
Likes
835
Odd yes, but does anyone really pursuit such a watch? It's not like a square crown guard case or bakelite bezel.

when it comes to rolexes, every tiny variation can bring money in. ft first over meters, stick dial vs romans, matte dials, tropical dials, unique serial numbers, hell even a bezel color that is all blue can command a premium (blueberry), the list goes on and on. same can be said for other companies and their variations.
 
Posts
17,768
Likes
26,945
I may come across as an ass, but the Omegas I understand because they look different and have different dials. I'm ignorant about watch collecting, but do transitional models get any permiums? I am not aware of any 16800, 16660, etc. getting a signif lift.
Dials, case variants, bezels, paperwork&boxes add lift, not much for transitional movements. GMT Cal 1066 vs 1035? 1016 cal 1560 vs 1570 Hacking vs non-hacking? 1040 vs 1040B?

I was personally shown a watch which this happened to the last few metal bezel GMT Masters as well, which basically says that the upgrade to parachrome spring was not to do with ceramic bezels.

Well the 145.022-71 No NASA is only different on the caseback having no inscription. The -68 transitional has a silver logo instead of printed.

As noted Rolex guys fetishize any little difference on the Sub. As for this example I could care less, but it's a watch that combines 2 references one of only a few watches inside one large reference. So who knows if in the end it will be higher value.
 
Posts
1,369
Likes
835
I may come across as an ass, but the Omegas I understand because they look different and have different dials. I'm ignorant about watch collecting, but do transitional models get any permiums? I am not aware of any 16800, 16660, etc. getting a signif lift.
Dials, case variants, bezels, paperwork&boxes add lift, not much for transitional movements. GMT Cal 1066 vs 1035? 1016 cal 1560 vs 1570 Hacking vs non-hacking? 1040 vs 1040B?

I was personally shown a watch which this happened to the last few metal bezel GMT Masters as well, which basically says that the upgrade to parachrome spring was not to do with ceramic bezels.

that can do it, 1655. 16550, 16570 for explorer 2s is an example.
1680,16800,168000 have tiny variations towards the end before going to 16610.
5512/5513 14060, 14060M have variations (though some would argue negligible)
1675, 16750,16760, 16700, 16710 have variations.


The Z serials is generally where the changes were made for stuff like the GMTs/explorer 2s. that is where some wonder if early Z serials have the 3185 vs 3186 for the gmts. There is no hard and fast rule about when the change exactly took place because there were some growing pains when the modification was introduced, so there have been stories where people bought in their 3185 for a service and they added in the modification. Generally it has been found that the later Z serials and on have the 3186 movement.
 
Posts
1,369
Likes
835
Well the 145.022-71 No NASA is only different on the caseback having no inscription. The -68 transitional has a silver logo instead of printed.

As noted Rolex guys fetishize any little difference on the Sub. As for this example I could care less, but it's a watch that combines 2 references one of only a few watches inside one large reference. So who knows if in the end it will be higher value.

hey hey I hate the engraved rehaut!
 
Posts
1,453
Likes
4,419
Thanks for the replies and also to the original poster. Interesting watch.
 
Posts
13
Likes
5
The Z serials is generally where the changes were made for stuff like the GMTs/explorer 2s. that is where some wonder if early Z serials have the 3185 vs 3186 for the gmts. There is no hard and fast rule about when the change exactly took place because there were some growing pains when the modification was introduced, so there have been stories where people bought in their 3185 for a service and they added in the modification. Generally it has been found that the later Z serials and on have the 3186 movement.

So oddly enough, I have a polar Explorer II Z serial...no engraved rehaut, but with the 3186 movement with revised hour gear train, and the parachrom blue hairspring. I haven't heard of any others like this, as most people have found the 3186 only in the later V and G serial models with the engraved rehaut.
 
Posts
17,768
Likes
26,945
I hate the engraved rehaut.

Can I get an Amen?
 
Posts
2,364
Likes
12,697
I hate the engraved rehaut.

Can I get an Amen?
Amen-gif-girl.gif

@ahartfie and I just said something about it earlier. Not a fan whatsoever
 
Posts
17,768
Likes
26,945
I love the engraved rehaut
May I ask why? To me thats like putting a Lamborghini sticker across the windshield of a Countach, its obvious what the watch/car is no need to scream it louder. It was an anti-counterfitting measure that Rolex put in that to most people massively detracts from the watch. There is no reason to have rolex printed repeatedly all around that area.
 
Posts
101
Likes
245
May I ask why? To me thats like putting a Lamborghini sticker across the windshield of a Countach, its obvious what the watch/car is no need to scream it louder. It was an anti-counterfitting measure that Rolex put in that to most people massively detracts from the watch. There is no reason to have rolex printed repeatedly all around that area.
It's just my opinion, but the reason I like it is that it is hidden, so it's not something screaming for attention and it is afterall more work and detail done to the timepiece. It sets the watch apart from the competition, I think it's really good, but again just my taste / opinion.