Although the 1171 and 1175 are great bracelets and good options, they’re not what would have been originally fitted to a 29m serial -69.
If the OP wants original, it’s a 1039.
I'm not sure where the "break" is with 1969 serial numbers, but this bracelet reference guide from Millenary Watches indicates that both the 1171 and the 1175 would be correct for a 1969 145.022: Omega Bracelet Reference Numbers Ultimate Guide - Millenary Watches
IMO the first 1175’s came with the straight writing case back -69’s, certainly not a DoN, 29m -69.
1171’s first appeared on the -71 imo.
Perhaps some appeared on very late -69’s but I’ve never seen one on a watch that appeared original.
Neither 1175 nor 1171 are correct for a 29m serial -69 imo.
Depends on your definition of -69, I have seen multiple -69 Straight writing with original 1171 bracelets and multiple reference to 1171/633 as the associated bracelet in their corresponding Extract from the Archive (earliest seen July 71). I also believe the first generation of 1171 with the Omega Logo in Relief was around before the 69-SW. I just cant believe the 1171 began on the -71 when references to the bracelet exist in extracts for -69 whether the 1171 goes back as far as a 29m serial I would leave it to others. I just have spent a lot of time researching straight writings when I was looking for one.
Depends on your definition of -69, I have seen multiple -69 Straight writing with original 1171 bracelets and multiple reference to 1171/633 as the associated bracelet in their corresponding Extract from the Archive (earliest seen July 71). I also believe the first generation of 1171 with the Omega Logo in Relief was around before the 69-SW. I just cant believe the 1171 began on the -71 when references to the bracelet exist in extracts for -69 whether the 1171 goes back as far as a 29m serial I would leave it to others. I just have spent a lot of time researching straight writings when I was looking for one.
