Look ok?

Posts
4,593
Likes
10,806
You promulgating nonsense does no good for anyone, especially a new owner of a vintage Constellation.

You do realize that bracelets of all type were optional dealer add ons at time of purchase don't you? Same for Rolex back in the day. One could pick any number of bracelet or straps when buying the watch.
 
Posts
5,636
Likes
5,800
You do realize that bracelets of all type were optional dealer add ons at time of purchase don't you? Same for Rolex back in the day. One could pick any number of bracelet or straps when buying the watch.
Yes, of course. That people put them on has nothing to do with what Omega designers intended. Why this is so hard to understand truly escapes me.
 
Posts
2,008
Likes
3,386
Actually, from my experience this is generally a very friendly forum, with many very experienced and vastly knowledgeable experts and collectors. Sometimes people get a little het up about details but in the end a consensus tends to form that assists people new to the world of vintage watches.
 
Posts
12,967
Likes
22,493
You promulgating nonsense does no good for anyone, especially a new owner of a vintage Constellation.

I’m not sure why you’ve reacted so utterly ridiculously to me disagreeing you but at least I can now be clear on your position on the original bracelet for the 167.005
 
Posts
4,593
Likes
10,806
Yes, of course. That people put them on has nothing to do with what Omega designers intended. Why this is so hard to understand truly escapes me.

Oh it's not at all hard to understand a factory parts list and suggested use. What is remarkable is the black and white adaptation some have toward what is "appropriate" for others to choose. You don't like the bracelet on that watch. We get it.
 
Posts
5,636
Likes
5,800
I’m not sure why you’ve reacted so utterly ridiculously to me disagreeing you but at least I can now be clear on your position on the original bracelet for the 167.005
Yes. There isn't one.
 
Posts
5,636
Likes
5,800
Oh it's not at all hard to understand a factory parts list and suggested use. What is remarkable is the black and white adaptation some have toward what is "appropriate" for others to choose. You don't like the bracelet on that watch. We get it.
I really don't give two shits what people choose, because it is their watch and their money. Did I not say that most of those come with 7-row bracelets (which fit but aren't on the list) and that the 5-row was completely inappropriate?

How about you people read what someone says before getting all uppity?
 
Posts
227
Likes
791
Well sometimes members here are a bit strict because they want to protect new members , but that watch is not that bad if you can get it at a reduced price then it can be a good buy , consider the cost of the service that it most likely wants ! Post some pictures when it arrives .
 
Posts
553
Likes
970
Well sometimes members here are a bit strict because they want to protect new members , but that watch is not that bad if you can get it at a reduced price then it can be a good buy , consider the cost of the service that it most likely wants ! Post some pictures when it arrives .
That’s true makes sense, thanks
I definitely appreciate the expert opinions
 
Posts
553
Likes
970
Too funny... I actually found an older ad for this same watch (I guess it gets around).
Pics show in a very different light.
Still of course not a prime example, I realize this.
i know it’s the same one because of the markings on the inside of the caseback.
 
Posts
553
Likes
970
Although maybe in the time between this ad and the one I saw it in, it spend some time at the bottom of the ocean😁
 
Posts
42
Likes
29
The main thing is will you enjoy it? If so, go for it.
I know we all want perfection and originality but sometimes its just the right one. Looking forward to wrist shots.
 
Posts
23,497
Likes
52,232
Although maybe in the time between this ad and the one I saw it in, it spend some time at the bottom of the ocean😁

Good example of how sellers will sometimes manipulate photos. They are just gambling on the idea that once someone receives the watch, they won't bother making a fuss and returning it. Personally, I'd rather have a happy buyer.

BTW, do you have the watch in hand yet?
 
Posts
9,550
Likes
52,725
Here’s my 167.005 with its seven row BOR. I agree with Janice&Fred that while this model came with a leather strap, the bracelet was always available as an option from the dealer. SkunkPrince, just curious, if the stainless steel BOR is, as you say, “less inappropriate” for the stainless steel 167.005 and its use was not intended for this particular reference by Omega’s designers, then for which reference(s) did Omega intend it to be used? Can you post the tables to which you refer in your responses?
Edited:
 
Posts
16,856
Likes
47,862
Although maybe in the time between this ad and the one I saw it in, it spend some time at the bottom of the ocean😁

No time in the ocean, just even more deceiving dealer pictures that are probably photo shopped. That’s what they do 👎 Have seen many buyers over the years here receive a watch nothing like what the pictures looked like in the FS advertising.

It’s hard to hide anything in a natural light shot.
 
Posts
553
Likes
970
Yup pretty good example here of dealers trying to hide imperfections like you guys say. Not in hand yet, will post when I do. Thanks again 👍
 
Posts
625
Likes
998
Yes, of course. That people put them on has nothing to do with what Omega designers intended. Why this is so hard to understand truly escapes me.

Just to weigh in here. The table to which I believe SP is referring is here: https://omegaforums.net/threads/case-bracelet-endpiece-list.81618/

Clearly, the dog leg Constellation is not on there. I have seen this reference mostly be fitted to 70 endlinks and 1503/1037 bracelets (amongst others).

When customers went into the Omega Boutique in 1969, and wanted their constellation on a bracelet, the dealers would pair their chosen watch with a bracelet which fitted (if there was one in stock). Clearly many were fitted with 70 endlinks and their respective BoR bracelets, I would point out that if Omega had not intended certain watches to be fitted to these bracelets, they would not have sent spare bracelets.

I suppose what SP is getting at is that if the original designer of the watch didn't want it to be worn on a bracelet, then it "shouldn't" be on a bracelet. I would disagree, as Omega were more than happy to send bracelets out to their boutiques if a customer wanted a particular watch on a bracelet, also, they could order them directly from Omega with bracelets on. The only proof I have of this, is a conversation I had with an Omega employee in the UK, I have omitted his name, should he not want it to be shared:

"Hi,

Hope you realised I was going back in time a few decades.

In those days watches were ordered mainly from the Omega Rep on his monthly call to the jewellers shop.

The orders placed were for the complete item eg. a particular model of a watch [Seamaster Constellation etc.] with either bracelet or leather strap fitted, so they were delivered complete for sale.

Gift/Display boxes came with a different courier.

Having a qualified watchmaker and workshop on site gave flexibility for link removal or change to a leather strap of a different colour as needed while the customer waited.

If a customer wanted a particular model on a strap/bracelet that was not in stock it was ordered direct from Omega telesales, usually on a next day service. [sic]

Hope this helps, please let me know if I mis-understood you question.

[The good old days of Pounds, Shillings and Pence.]

Best wishes,
"

I take the view that if you could order the watch from Omega with the bracelet fitted, then that is as close as you can get to an original bracelet, further, if Omega themselves were happy to send you a bracelet to fit on a watch, this is also the original bracelet for the watch.

To take the view that the only correct formulation of a watch is what existed in, for example, Design Team #7's mind when they originally sketched out the watch is, at least in my mind, questionable.