Forums Latest Members

Longines Majetek thread...

  1. DirtyDozen12 Thanks, mystery donor! Nov 26, 2017

    Posts
    1,780
    Likes
    2,834
    The sub-dial is a dead give away.

    Also, would one expect to find an enamel dial with a 15.68Z?
     
  2. DirtyDozen12 Thanks, mystery donor! Nov 26, 2017

    Posts
    1,780
    Likes
    2,834
    There are indeed many, correct dial variations but the example that I posted is not one of them.
     
  3. Moadib Nov 26, 2017

    Posts
    190
    Likes
    234
    Had never heard of these, but looks a wonderful watch. The discolouration of the dial and numerals work beautifully. Even the 'orange peel' on the dial looks really nice.
     
  4. DirtyDozen12 Thanks, mystery donor! Nov 26, 2017

    Posts
    1,780
    Likes
    2,834
    If it was a metal dial, the sub-dial would be sunken.
     
  5. Seiji Nov 26, 2017

    Posts
    583
    Likes
    903
    yako54 likes this.
  6. boltman Nov 26, 2017

    Posts
    215
    Likes
    108
    Wow, learn something new everyday on these forums
     
  7. Klaus Dec 6, 2017

    Posts
    2
    Likes
    6
     
  8. Klaus Dec 6, 2017

    Posts
    2
    Likes
    6
    Here is a picture of my watch, delivered (and confirmed by Longines) in Dec. 1938, movement is a 15.26, engraved no. is 21xx Longines.GIF
     
    Mods, Syrte, valjoux72 and 3 others like this.
  9. primabaleron Dec 9, 2017

    Posts
    434
    Likes
    5,459
    My dial is porcelain or metal?

    And what should I think about the lack of inscription on the backcase?

    8.JPG

    2.JPG
     
  10. Seiji Dec 9, 2017

    Posts
    583
    Likes
    903
    The dial that if it exists, would be the most interesting to me is an underline at 6 position.
    E5965166-5BFA-4B39-9122-F8AB5F43DA2D.jpeg 268EFF09-50D4-49F7-A000-705BC2C5527B.jpeg
     
  11. Syrte MWR Tech Support Dept Dec 9, 2017

    Posts
    6,058
    Likes
    16,518
    I don't really know these but I seem to recall that Stiocour on MWR who researched them extensively got confirmation from Longines that some civilian ones were also delivered.
     
  12. Seiji Dec 9, 2017

    Posts
    583
    Likes
    903
    If you mean unmarked case backs, that is my understanding that there were many sent to military.
     
  13. DirtyDozen12 Thanks, mystery donor! Dec 10, 2017

    Posts
    1,780
    Likes
    2,834
    This apparent underline may not be the result of a distinct dial variant but rather just the application of lume in that location.
    1.JPG
     
    watchyouwant and Seiji like this.
  14. Syrte MWR Tech Support Dept Dec 10, 2017

    Posts
    6,058
    Likes
    16,518
    You’re right, that was what it was.
     
  15. Seiji Dec 10, 2017

    Posts
    583
    Likes
    903
    To further elaborate...I don't believe Longines marked any casebacks. I never ask Longines, so I don't have anything other than second hand research. I believe the command marked the cases with what we think of as original markings.
     
  16. Syrte MWR Tech Support Dept Dec 10, 2017

    Posts
    6,058
    Likes
    16,518
    Based on what people have written on MWR Longines did mark some of the case backs themselves.
    That was part of Stiocour’s research, he also got evidence about unmarked watches which according to the archives were supplied to the Czech military but had no markings.

    From Stiocour on MWR:
    « The extract of Longines register for my serial number also mentions the majetek engravings, but strangely enough, they are not stamped on my watch!

    May be some were shipped before the engravings were made, or they were possibly erased at a later stage, nobody knows. »
    http://www.mwrforum.net/forums/show...watch-quot-Tartarugone-quot&highlight=MAjetek
     
  17. Seiji Dec 10, 2017

    Posts
    583
    Likes
    903
    Thanks!
     
  18. dodo44 Dec 10, 2017

    Posts
    242
    Likes
    265
    I confirm what @Syrte wrote about Longines marking the cases with Majetek (at least for the 15.26 series). These are the records that the wonderful people at Longines provided me with for 2 of my 3 Majeteks (both 15.26 movements). I do not know if they marked or have kept the records for the other series (the 3rd that I have is a 15.68 but I did not specifically ask about the markings).

    The order number is XXXXX and I confirm the Majetek engraving.

    The order number is XXXXX and I confirm there must be no engraving.
     
    Syrte likes this.
  19. minutenrohr Dec 11, 2017

    Posts
    1,515
    Likes
    18,152
    Two further pics of mine:
    IMG_7074.JPG IMG_7076.JPG
     
    yako54 likes this.
  20. minutenrohr Dec 11, 2017

    Posts
    1,515
    Likes
    18,152
    Yes - I think you´re right. Thanks for the exploration. Is that red ball made by Longines or later? rgds - h.u.
     
    Syrte likes this.