Forums Latest Members

Longines dial question of redial

  1. setible Nov 4, 2023

    Posts
    25
    Likes
    5
    hi, does this one looks like a redial to you?
    Also, the case is gold caped, but the logo puts it before 1951. Do you believe that is possible?
     
    baed4d72-fa29-4c8c-ae14-8a4b63a0ac9e.jpg descărcare.jpg
  2. Larry S Color Commentator for the Hyperbole. Nov 4, 2023

    Posts
    12,120
    Likes
    48,187
    Look like a cheap redial.
     
    Spruce likes this.
  3. setible Nov 4, 2023

    Posts
    25
    Likes
    5
    maybe the back of the case is of any help
     
    Screenshot 2023-11-04 203708.png
  4. Spruce Sunburst dial fan Nov 4, 2023

    Posts
    6,215
    Likes
    47,974
    + 1
     
  5. DirtyDozen12 Thanks, mystery donor! Nov 4, 2023

    Posts
    2,599
    Likes
    4,403
    I would want to see clearer photos of the dial. I do not recall seeing many similar examples (dial or case). Most somewhat similar examples have steel cases and dials with embossed hour markers. I imagine that the movement is a cal. 12.68Z. Can you clarify what you mean about the logo indicating that the watch is from before 1951? Do you have photos of the movement and inside of the case-back? Also, I would be curious to know in which country he watch is for sale. There seemed to be a demand for gold-plated Longines in Spain during the period.
     
    setible likes this.
  6. setible Nov 5, 2023

    Posts
    25
    Likes
    5
    Hi, the country for sell is Germany and it is not gold plated, but goldcap with a full gold ring bazel. The dial dont have the wing logo, thats why i say 1951 or prior... and, sadly, I dont have pictures of the movement.
     
  7. setible Nov 5, 2023

    Posts
    25
    Likes
    5
    And it has 38 mm
     
  8. DirtyDozen12 Thanks, mystery donor! Nov 5, 2023

    Posts
    2,599
    Likes
    4,403
    Right, gold-capped, my mistake. Personally, I would not proceed with the purchase without seeing the movement, inside of the case-back, and a clearer photo of the dial. As I mentioned, this is not an especially common dial or case so it is not easy to compare with known correct examples.

    With regard to the absence of a winged-hourglass logo suggesting that the watch is from 1951 or earlier, I think that there are exceptions. Below is a ref. 5411 with serial number 8'242'478 that was invoiced to Wirth on 16 July 1952.

    1.JPG 2.JPG 3.JPG 4.JPG
     
    setible likes this.
  9. Modest_Proposal Trying too hard to be one of the cool kids Nov 5, 2023

    Posts
    2,889
    Likes
    5,950
    Gold-capped cases are uncommon for Longines, but they are out there. Here is one I use to own:

    Screenshot 2023-11-05 at 9.25.55 AM.png IMG_2396_zps3ea33855.jpg Screenshot 2023-11-05 at 9.26.16 AM.png

    Your watch is probably also a 30L.

    I would like better photos, too, but I'm leaning toward yours being original.
     
    DirtyDozen12 and setible like this.
  10. DirtyDozen12 Thanks, mystery donor! Nov 5, 2023

    Posts
    2,599
    Likes
    4,403
    Thanks for sharing that beautiful example! If the watch in question does contain a cal. 30L, then the absence of a winged-hourglass logo would be surprising, don't you think?
     
  11. DirtyDozen12 Thanks, mystery donor! Nov 5, 2023

    Posts
    2,599
    Likes
    4,403
    setible likes this.
  12. Modest_Proposal Trying too hard to be one of the cool kids Nov 5, 2023

    Posts
    2,889
    Likes
    5,950
    I hadn't realized how ubiquitous the logo was on these 30L's until you mentioned it - but you're right. That's a bad sign. I was comparing the Longines and "Swiss" signatures and the subdial print, which all seem to match (at far as I can tell with these fuzzy photos). Good quality photos would help clear this up.
     
    setible and DirtyDozen12 like this.
  13. Tony C. Ωf Jury member Nov 5, 2023

    Posts
    7,174
    Likes
    23,227
    A couple of points.

    The watch appears to have mirror-finish indices, and I actually see no reason to believe that it is a redial. And given what appears to be a very well-preserved case, why would a redial have been necessary?

    I'd need to see more, and better photos to firm up my opinion, but it looks good to me...
     
    NotAClue and setible like this.
  14. Modest_Proposal Trying too hard to be one of the cool kids Nov 5, 2023

    Posts
    2,889
    Likes
    5,950
    Yup, yup and yup!

    :thumbsup:
     
    setible and Tony C. like this.
  15. setible Nov 5, 2023

    Posts
    25
    Likes
    5
    i cant get a movement picture, just this as a proof of the good state of the watch
     
    Screenshot 2023-11-05 203749.png
  16. Dan S Nov 5, 2023

    Posts
    17,453
    Likes
    40,480
    Nothing is jumping out at me as wrong from those photos and my gut feeling is that the watch is ok. But I also wouldn't buy the watch based on those photos unless it was very cheap and I was in a gambling mood.
     
    setible likes this.