- Posts
- 82
- Likes
- 203
B.Frost
·My beloved Tri-Compax
Lets see your UG Tri-Compax
- Posts
- 813
- Likes
- 3,435
MarktheTime
·
- Posts
- 4
- Likes
- 2
jpet88
·Wow really love the sword hands examples!
- Posts
- 251
- Likes
- 1,355
ajn3323
·Here’s one more
- Posts
- 7,858
- Likes
- 56,997
TexOmega
·37mm SS
ref. # 22543
ref. # 22543
Edited:
- Posts
- 1,195
- Likes
- 1,975
rolokr
·
- Posts
- 3,086
- Likes
- 23,780
aap
·
- Posts
- 1,195
- Likes
- 1,975
rolokr
·
- Posts
- 17
- Likes
- 14
Goldchronolove
·These are all amazing. Looking to hop on the bandwagon soon myself! Question for any/all, is it rare/legit for the top moonphase subdial to not have a circle around it or be depressed? I only noticed one example like this of the bunch posted on this thread.
- Posts
- 1,167
- Likes
- 4,180
- Posts
- 17
- Likes
- 14
Goldchronolove
·Thanks, that's useful. I was looking at the first one of the group posted by Larry S that seems to be of a 1940s vintage and has no circle. So i am mostly curious if that is sometimes the case even in the older models.
- Posts
- 1,167
- Likes
- 4,180
Oku
·Thanks, that's useful. I was looking at the first one of the group posted by Larry S that seems to be of a 1940s vintage and has no circle. So i am mostly curious if that is sometimes the case even in the older models.
- Posts
- 12,910
- Likes
- 51,616
Larry S
··Color Commentator for the Hyperbole.Thanks, that's useful. I was looking at the first one of the group posted by Larry S that seems to be of a 1940s vintage and has no circle. So i am mostly curious if that is sometimes the case even in the older models.
Edited:
- Posts
- 17
- Likes
- 14
Goldchronolove
·Oh interesting. The watch I was looking at most definitely has a serial number from the 1940s as well as a face on the moon, but no circle around the days on the moonphase subdial.. I wonder if they stuck a 1960s dial on a 1940s watch then. Would make sense it's a bit of a mash up because it has a signed crown which I can't remember seeing on any 1940s models I've come across online either.
- Posts
- 17
- Likes
- 14
Goldchronolove
·How much do time period inconsistencies like that effect the value of a tri-compax?
- Posts
- 1,167
- Likes
- 4,180
Oku
·Oh interesting. The watch I was looking at most definitely has a serial number from the 1940s as well as a face on the moon, but no circle around the days on the moonphase subdial.. I wonder if they stuck a 1960s dial on a 1940s watch then. Would make sense it's a bit of a mash up because it has a signed crown which I can't remember seeing on any 1940s models I've come across online either.
- Posts
- 12,910
- Likes
- 51,616
Larry S
··Color Commentator for the Hyperbole.Signed crowns began in the 50's. We need to see a pic.
- Posts
- 17
- Likes
- 14
Goldchronolove
·A little fuzzy
- Posts
- 17
- Likes
- 14
- Posts
- 12,910
- Likes
- 51,616
Larry S
··Color Commentator for the Hyperbole.Nice watch....but....Definitely a later dial. Drilled lugs. Without SN, can’t know what came first. It’s put together for sure. All UG parts though so that saves it’s value somewhat. Biggest drag on value imo is the case work.
Similar threads
- Posts
- 5
- Views
- 874
- Posts
- 5
- Views
- 2K
