Let's see some 30mm manual wind omegas

Posts
1,502
Likes
5,802
Royal Air Force 1942, movement 30T2SC. Older picture.
I sometimes wonder if some of us has issues with wearing a non-incabloc watch in daily use? My watchmaker says some of the balances even risk damage in mail.
 
Posts
7,611
Likes
21,830
I sometimes wonder if some of us has issues with wearing a non-incabloc watch in daily use? My watchmaker says some of the balances even risk damage in mail.
I can’t really say because I’m a lady and I work at a desk so I’ve never had any problem with daily use. I don’t usually bang watches- the only times I’ve broken one is when I have dropped them accidentally, twice unfortunately— and that did not happen in the process of wearing a watch regularly, rather in the process of pulling out the watch from storage in one case— and in manipulating the movement stupidly during inspection at my watchmakers. As a result of which the needed service also required a balance replacement. Never again.
 
Posts
1,502
Likes
5,802
I can’t really say because I’m a lady and I work at a desk so I’ve never had any problem with daily use. I don’t usually bang watches- the only times I’ve broken one is when I have dropped them accidentally, twice unfortunately— and that did not happen in the process of wearing a watch regularly, rather in the process of pulling out the watch from storage in one case— and in manipulating the movement stupidly during inspection at my watchmakers. As a result of which the needed service also required a balance replacement. Never again.
I think a lot of us have tried that. My watchmaker, always a know-better, tells me: "have the watch in a drawer or on your wrist." :whipped:
 
Posts
145
Likes
1,267
Royal Air Force 1942, movement 30T2SC. Older picture.
My RAF Omega from 1942 in Stainless steel says hello. Older pic as well but i still own it👍
 
Posts
145
Likes
1,267
My other two i have is a cal 265, ref 2639-4 and Omega Suverän cal 30T2PC, ref 2400-2
 
Posts
478
Likes
664
Is there a reference database? Cant seem to find if my 13322 has any more of a reference than that? Is it 2705? Also if I request an extract of the archives will I get much as case was U.K. and assembled here?
 
Posts
145
Likes
1,267
Is there a reference database? Cant seem to find if my 13322 has any more of a reference than that? Is it 2705? Also if I request an extract of the archives will I get much as case was U.K. and assembled here?
This is a Dennison case reference, they were a local market product for the U.K. To my knowledge the English case-maker Dennison imported Omega movements and cased them in (“Dennisteel”) cases.
 
Posts
478
Likes
664
Thanks yes - do you know does that mean no ck or ot reference?
will extract of archives deal only w the movement supply?
There are a huge number of variations. There were a good number of 9ct and some 18ct gold as well as steel.
 
Posts
145
Likes
1,267
Thanks yes - do you know does that mean no ck or ot reference?
will extract of archives deal only w the movement supply?
There are a huge number of variations. There were a good number of 9ct and some 18ct gold as well as steel.
The reference is Dennison’s own, to my knowledge the 13322 was used to case Longines movements as well. I think Omega can only provide you with information based on the movement serial number. This is the best answer i can give you.
Edited:
 
Posts
27,677
Likes
70,322
I sometimes wonder if some of us has issues with wearing a non-incabloc watch in daily use? My watchmaker says some of the balances even risk damage in mail.

While there's no doubt that watch movements that don't have shock protection on the balance are more vulnerable to broken staffs, in everyday use this usually isn't a problem. I service a good number of watches without shock protection, and broken balance staffs are still not a common problem. The bigger issue is dropping the watch, but unless you really smash it hard into a door frame or something, the staff is likely to be okay when wearing the watch.

Note that I have shipped these watches all over the place as well - not one has ever arrived with a broken staff. The only way that is a real risk is if the watch isn't packaged well, or if the cargo plane goes down...

Cheers, Al
 
Posts
478
Likes
664
B bbozic
The reference is Dennison’s own, to my knowledge the 13322 was used to case Longines movements as well. I think Omega can only provide you with information based on the movement serial number. This is the best answer i can give you.
Thanks bboz - I did look at the Dennison longines as well - the cases are apparently identical - both Omega and Longines 12.68z fit
 
Posts
201
Likes
365
I'm a fan of the two-tones from this era. Here's a 1949 cal 265, bought in New York City in 2012.
 
Posts
1
Likes
14
I inherited this watch from my grandfather who got it in 1949. As far as I could gather it is a ref. 2367, 30 SC T2 RG with a cal. 281 movement.
It keeps exact time but as it has not been used and running or serviced for probably 40 years, I brought it in to a watchmaker to have it disasembled and cleaned. The seconds hand is not original, I was told and will be exchanged. I am looking forward to getting it back in a few weeks time.
I am very happy with it!
 
Posts
308
Likes
960
You should be happy with it, it’s very nice indeed. Enjoy 😀
 
Posts
5,957
Likes
43,500
That watch is a tough act to follow. Welcome to the Forum bernstein.

Here's a new 30mm manual wind acquisition, a '62 vintage Seamaster with a 286 movement.


Seller's photographs