Been meditating a bit on this... going to nitpick the hell out of it.
On the pros:
1. Love that there's less writing on the dial; good to have less clutter, but they could've gone further
(more in the con section about that).
2. Lollipop second is a good kind of "signature quirk" for this dial, just design-wise, I don't know about the history here. So much of the dial is spiky and pointy and putting a lollipop here might annoy some, but I personally think it works well against all that triangular stuff. Also, it's echoed in the bezel pip.
3. Very much want to see the dial in person, but the two-layer with the numeral cut-outs looks pretty great.
4. Case seems unchanged, and I personally like the stocky/blocky look of this case design; ditto the bracelet, though I'd put this on a nato in a second.
On the cons:
1. Like others have mentioned, the fauxtina is too much and I have massive fauxtina fatigue with Omega.
2. "Sarlacc" markers
(similar to the railmaster) that I think are too pronounced. Per the less clutter note above, I think the hour and minute marks could've been made narrower/shorter, and the dial would breathe a lot more, and the cutout numerals would own the dial space a bit more, as I think they rightly should. The dial and markers could've been wonderfully minimal, approaching a similar simplicity like we see in the bezel, but instead it feels a bit frantic at the edges.
3. Not entirely sold on the crown.