James Hyman Lume Artist - 2915 dial restoration

Posts
3,174
Likes
7,329
I recommend to call him and discuss your ideas first: +44 754xxxxxxxxxxx
might not appreciate his direct (cell) number being on a public forumv
 
Posts
234
Likes
248
might not appreciate his direct (cell) number being on a public forumv

Well, I asked James before I posted this thread... 😀
 
Posts
234
Likes
248
As promised here are some pictures of what finally returned to me:


Considering from where we started, this result is far apart from what I had expected... 😀

And to the naked eye, this dial looks perfect now!
 
Posts
3,174
Likes
7,329
A vast improvement on what went before. I actually like the radium burns on the subdials ... I'm just trying to decide if the re-lume isn't "too good". Then again, wear it for a few more decades and I'm sure it'll start to puff up. 😁
 
Posts
234
Likes
248
A vast improvement on what went before. I actually like the radium burns on the subdials ... I'm just trying to decide if the re-lume isn't "too good". Then again, wear it for a few more decades and I'm sure it'll start to puff up. 😁

Come on... Brown lume is available around every corner. 😉
 
Posts
234
Likes
248
Looking good - thanks for sharing.

any UV pic, please? 😁

James did not use UV powder, because the indices were totally damaged and UV lume is harder to apply. So I went for the best optical result and did not want to risk it might go wrong.
 
Posts
1,822
Likes
28,001
James did not use UV powder, because the indices were totally damaged and UV lume is harder to apply. So I went for the best optical result and did not want to risk it might go wrong.
Nice information in this thread and sharing the work with us.
 
Posts
2,428
Likes
4,697
I'm just trying to decide if the re-lume isn't "too good".
Let's call it Mr. Hymans "Signature". I appreciate this honest approach way more than having him doing things where you can't tell under 20x magnification if it's original or restored lume.

I believe we will have many more well restored dials in the future and that's a good thing.
 
Posts
2,257
Likes
11,389
James did not use UV powder, because the indices were totally damaged and UV lume is harder to apply. So I went for the best optical result and did not want to risk it might go wrong.

Understood 😀

Still curious to see how the material he used looks like under a UV torch, though... Would you have one so you can snap a pic and share?

That dial is lovely 🥰

thanks!

Paul
 
Posts
234
Likes
248
Understood 😀

Still curious to see how the material he used looks like under a UV torch, though... Would you have one so you can snap a pic and share?

That dial is lovely 🥰

thanks!

Paul

Sorry, I don't have any UV source here. Otherwise I'd do of course.
 
Posts
2,257
Likes
11,389
Ha - sorry, didn't understand that earlier, that's why I kept asking 😒

For the record, you can pick a $5 UV light that does the job very well on pretty much any of the usual online platforms!
 
Posts
234
Likes
248
Ha - sorry, didn't understand that earlier, that's why I kept asking 😒

For the record, you can pick a $5 UV light that does the job very well on pretty much any of the usual online platforms!

I know it's not a thing. But I simply don't have one here at the moment.

Then I know that James did not use UV powder. So what are you expecting to see?
 
Posts
538
Likes
5,709
Really amazing improvement to my eyes, I’d be delighted with that compared to the “original “ posted.
 
Posts
234
Likes
248
Let's call it Mr. Hymans "Signature". I appreciate this honest approach way more than having him doing things where you can't tell under 20x magnification if it's original or restored lume.

I believe we will have many more well restored dials in the future and that's a good thing.

Yes. And in this case it didn't matter if one can spot out it's a relume. I just wanted to have a wearable dial. That was also the reason to go for the dull yellow colour. I have enough of dials with brown indices, already.
 
Posts
234
Likes
248
Really amazing improvement to my eyes, I’d be delighted with that compared to the “original “ posted.

I'm not sure what you mean. Do you want me to post a photomontage? It's the same dial.
Edited:
 
Posts
999
Likes
1,678
Let's call it Mr. Hymans "Signature". I appreciate this honest approach way more than having him doing things where you can't tell under 20x magnification if it's original or restored lume.

I believe we will have many more well restored dials in the future and that's a good thing.

If you can't tell under 20x mag if it's a relume or not, at that point, does it matter?

Yes I know, "it's not original", but what I mean is, but if it gets to the point where literally experts cannot distinguish a relume.... whats the difference?
 
Posts
234
Likes
248
If you can't tell under 20x mag if it's a relume or not, at that point, does it matter?

Yes I know, "it's not original", but what I mean is, but if it gets to the point where literally experts cannot distinguish a relume.... whats the difference?

The most important thing to me is that a dial is the face of a watch. And you have to look at it from a normal distance. Super macro shots are fine, but have no value for everyday use.

Every relume, may it be with UV powder, tritium, radium or whatever has to simply follow the thougt how the watch looks on your wrist in the end. Because this is the only thing that matters, unless you are watching your timepiece through a microscope all day long.
 
Posts
2,428
Likes
4,697
Yes I know, "it's not original", but what I mean is, but if it gets to the point where literally experts cannot distinguish a relume.... whats the difference?
Take a look at the Vintage (Rolex) market and think a step further.
It's more about certain sellers who "fail" to disclose value relevant things to then ask a premium from you, not about the fact how good a re-lume/casework/redial/fake parts is/are. That's the difference. You can already see it every day, even though the forensic skills needed are comparably low now.