Is this watch real or fake thread - aka Fake Busters!!

Posts
8,705
Likes
14,604
Hi guys
The picture that ewand kindly posted for me is the watch in question
Does it look genuine please?
Thanks
What has your research determined?
 
Posts
12
Likes
1
Jury is still out,i have not got enough expertise on this watch,i have watched a few videos and it looks ok
Ill wait for a few more opinons
 
Posts
8,705
Likes
14,604
Jury is still out,i have not got enough expertise on this watch,i have watched a few videos and it looks ok
Ill wait for a few more opinons
The amount of information you receive is directly proportional to the effort you put in.
 
Posts
12
Likes
1
I know ,im still looking at how to spot a fake omega watch web sites
What is your opinion of the watch please ?(see pic )
 
Posts
8,705
Likes
14,604
Thankful for your opinion / expertise:
This "Eterna" has an early unsigned Venus movement and just a numbered case. The watch is dating from 1930´s to 1940´s
The case number 42332 does not correspond with other Eterna numbers from this period.
Do you believe that the watch is authentic and genuine "Eterna"?
Thank you for sharing your opinion!

Why are you posting a vintage Eterna question in the Modern Omega Fake Busters thread? You'll get better answers in the Other Watch Brands forum.
 
Posts
38
Likes
15
Hi experienced people!

I'm wondering about this Ti Planet Ocean, the picture below being from Jomashop's website. The writing on the rotor says "(omega symbol) omega co-axial" but there's no "8500" after that and instead a rather unbalanced gap. Other examples of this watch that I've seen proudly include the 8500. Is there some valid reason there is a blank space on the rotor?
 
Posts
999
Likes
1,677
Hi experienced people!

I'm wondering about this Ti Planet Ocean, the picture below being from Jomashop's website. The writing on the rotor says "(omega symbol) omega co-axial" but there's no "8500" after that and instead a rather unbalanced gap. Other examples of this watch that I've seen proudly include the 8500. Is there some valid reason there is a blank space on the rotor?

Joma doesn’t sell fakes
 
Posts
38
Likes
15
Thanks ac 106, that's reassuring. It seemed unlikely to me that it would be a fake, though I still don't understand the rotor marking.
 
Posts
3,893
Likes
8,740
There are many more things horribly wrong with this piece of junk than "Missions".
 
Posts
456
Likes
278
Yes, seller claims a jeweler in New York authenticated it as being genuine....lol
 
Posts
456
Likes
278
I reported it as well and I think seller realized it was fake
 
Posts
344
Likes
229
Here's a lovely example of a chrono/day-date that is maybe the worst POS I've seen. Reported.
s-l1600.jpg
s-l1600.jpg
 
Posts
4
Likes
0

  1. Quick question I have recently acquired a quartz Seamaster 2541.80, had to have the Goldeneye. Now this isn't my first Seamaster so as I am inspecting the watch the bezel seems funny to me as if it has play to it. After messing with it for a few seconds I figure out it only a 60 click bezel. Now having owned several other SMPs I realize that they all have 120 clicks like my 2054.50 I pulled from the box just to be sure. Now my pre bond Seamaster on the other hand has a 60 click bezel that feels very similar to this Bond SMP. Does anyone know if the Bond Seamasters ever had 60 click bezels any info would be appreciated
 
Posts
1
Likes
0
My son gave me this watch for Christmas about 14/15 years ago. I have never really used it as I have a general everyday Seiko I use for Watersports etc. What do people think about it? I can’t see any numbers on the reverse, and there is a missing bit on the top of the bezel where a small piece of luminous material would be. Your thoughts please.
Many thanks