Is this a Spillman case?

Posts
3,323
Likes
7,842
I know the classic Spillman case with the angled lugs, drilled through, and the particular caseback. But I see lots of other types of cases referred to as Spillman. I assume they made other cases in addition to the one style I am talking about? Or is a Spillman case ONLY that classic angled lugs design?

I started a thread about this a while back, asking if anyone had any data for all the different types of Spillman UG references, but no response, so not sure if this has been studied/documented?

For example, is this a Spillman case?
 
Posts
971
Likes
3,648
Of course not a Spillman one.
Spillman was a case producer, with many others. Today "Spillman cases" are very desirable, but IMO they are nice cases, with many others.
 
Posts
3,323
Likes
7,842
So are there other spillman case styles aside from the faceted example I posted above, or is that the only case they made?

I just see many cases referred to as spillman and I’m not sure if ppl are wrong, or if I am just not familiar with the range of spillman cases
 
Posts
21,738
Likes
49,337
This is the classic style I mean with the angled lugs...

Gorgeous Compur BTW.

I'm sure you know this, but not all cases with those angled lugs are made by Spillman. There are some generic lookalikes. This case-back indicates a Spillman case.

Edited:
 
Posts
3,323
Likes
7,842
Gorgeous Compur BTW.

I'm sure you know this, but not all cases with those angled lugs are made by Spillman. There are some generic lookalikes. This case-back indicates a Spillman case.


Thx. Yah I’m familiar, it’s more these other style cases I’m trying to understand. There are some even in the FS forum here that ppl refer to as spillman and I’m not clear if that is accurate
 
Posts
21,738
Likes
49,337
You can also look for a hammerhead with "136" on gold cases, and case reference codes starting with "SP".
 
Posts
548
Likes
2,555
Spillmann made numerous different styles of cases over the years aside from the angled lugs special and waterproofs which are famous around here.

The only failsafe way to identify a Spillmann is to open the case and see what is stamped on the inside case back. They do seem to be regularly mislabelled by people (especially dealers) who have failed to do this.

The question then arises; was every single Spillmann case stamped with a unique identifier (136 hammerhead makers mark for gold, 'SP' for later steel cases and so on)? If so, a definitive key of these stamps would be most helpful and basically foolproof (famous last words).

There is an excellent Spillmann post from Orologi translated here;
https://translate.google.com/transl...//orologi.forumfree.it/?t=63472246&edit-text=

(article first made known to me by @Carlton-Browne in this excellent thread - thank you)
https://omegaforums.net/threads/just-in-compur-with-nice-lugs.45606/#post-540718

To see just how difficult any external visual case check is, look at this advert. Who here would've said that these were Spillmann cases by sight alone?

 
Posts
7,768
Likes
27,009
Funny thing about the angled lug "signature" is that it is not a reliable way to identify Spillman cases. Look no further than the Mido Multicenterchrono cases, manufactured by Taubert (aka "FB"), for examples.
 
Posts
59
Likes
65
I have been looking into Spillman cases here recently and have a quick response to the original question.

Looks to me that UG did not use Spillman on smaller diameter non-angular lugged models in stainless steel. However, examples of a similar ilk produced in gold were Spillman manufactured (hammerhead 136 stamped inside caseback):
https://www.bachmann-scher.de/en/so...vintage-compax-chronograph-14k-gold-3784.html
https://www.bernardinimilano.com/products/universal-geneve-compax-18
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Universal-...123048?hash=item1cdbf185e8:g:mL4AAOSwByhdlRR3

A quick observation is Spillman gold models have smaller diameter pusher "shafts" (excuse my jargon) than their "enversteel" brothers.
 
This website may earn commission from Ebay sales.
Posts
212
Likes
423
I have a UG with angled lugs but no 136 marking indicating that is a Spillman case. So, I guess this is not always the rule when it comes to lugs shaped like that.
Mine has 128 marking inside the caseback.
 
Posts
42
Likes
131
I have been looking into Spillman cases here recently and have a quick response to the original question.

Looks to me that UG did not use Spillman on smaller diameter non-angular lugged models in stainless steel. However, examples of a similar ilk produced in gold were Spillman manufactured (hammerhead 136 stamped inside caseback):
https://www.bachmann-scher.de/en/so...vintage-compax-chronograph-14k-gold-3784.html
https://www.bernardinimilano.com/products/universal-geneve-compax-18
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Universal-...123048?hash=item1cdbf185e8:g:mL4AAOSwByhdlRR3

A quick observation is Spillman gold models have smaller diameter pusher "shafts" (excuse my jargon) than their "enversteel" brothers.

I believe those shafts that you refer to, are in fact replacement pushers. The generic spillman case commonly referred to doesnt have the smaller diameter pusher shaft, even in Gold
 
This website may earn commission from Ebay sales.
Posts
21,738
Likes
49,337
Mine has 128 marking inside the caseback.

Jung & Cie case, I believe. Are the angled lugs in the same shape as the Spillman case. The ones I have seen are not tapered.
 
Posts
1,869
Likes
24,733
How about this Welex? 😀

2NJCK7U.jpg
oDqF2UO.jpg
 
Posts
795
Likes
1,156
You can also look for a hammerhead with "136" on gold cases, and case reference codes starting with "SP".

Okay.
So, what is a 166 instead of 136 hammerhead stamp on a UG 18kt. gold case?
 
Posts
21,738
Likes
49,337
Okay.
So, what is a 166 instead of 136 hammerhead stamp on a UG 18kt. gold case?

I generally find these things using google, so I assume you can do the same. Do you think I have the codes memorized? 🙄
 
Posts
3,323
Likes
7,842
Okay.
So, what is a 166 instead of 136 hammerhead stamp on a UG 18kt. gold case?

everyone knows 166 is Henri Jeanneret 👍