Is my Omega Seamaster oryginal

Posts
9,887
Likes
55,948
Based on these photos, I would say no. Do you have a photos of the entire dial and the entire case back?
 
Posts
10,531
Likes
16,452
Based on these photos, I would say no. Do you have a photos of the entire dial and the entire case back?
What are you seeing? Those aren't the most useful shots for verification but what little there is checks out to me.
 
Posts
2,580
Likes
5,710
Nice photo skills!

But show the watch so we can see it?? Front and back...😉
 
Posts
9,887
Likes
55,948
Agreed, very hard to tell from these photos, but the text looks fuzzy and too bold to me. Maybe it's just the enlargement in the photos? That's why I asked for full photos of the dial and case back.
 
Posts
13,289
Likes
23,072
Yeah it looks ok to me but a full shot to bring everything together is needed
 
Posts
5
Likes
2
Above shots from microscope. I will made front and back and post it here
 
Posts
2,735
Likes
3,634
Looks legit to me as well now that we have more than macro shots. I think a poor camera and shaking made the text and lume look fizzier than it is. HEV in correct place and bezel pip looks good, which are the tells on fakes of these older models. It’s also a midsize, quartz model, so not a popular version to fake.
 
Posts
5
Likes
2
This is from proffesional saler from Yapan, but the price was more then 1000euro so I have need to know:😉
 
Posts
9,887
Likes
55,948
I'm going to go with legit now that we have full photos of the dial and case back. Photos could still be a LOT better. Outdoors in natural light and straight on, front and back, and reasonably close would really help..
 
Posts
29,885
Likes
77,303
Based on what can be seen by the odd photos, it looks okay. Better photos in good lighting would help...

Serial number says what it's supposed to be:

Serial number: 59631087
Article ref: 25618000
 
Posts
24,589
Likes
54,607
Those photos remind me of the story of the blind men and the elephant.