- Posts
- 278
- Likes
- 1,624
Wizzar
·Hi, I recently bought this omega please review it thank you
Please review originality on my omega Seamaster 2854
- Posts
- 1,588
- Likes
- 5,386
Vanallard
·You’ll likely get some more responses if you share your thoughts based on the research you’ve done. You have the reference number. Easy enough to search the forum or do a google search.
- Posts
- 278
- Likes
- 1,624
Wizzar
·You’ll likely get some more responses if you share your thoughts based on the research you’ve done. You have the reference number. Easy enough to search the forum or do a google search.
- Posts
- 10,806
- Likes
- 16,814
padders
··Oooo subtitles!Fair enough. I don’t know this model specifically but I know the similar 2846 and 2848 models well. This is presumably the certified version of the 2846.
The dial on yours looks fine to me and is clearly mottled but in an attractive way. Indeed the only thing here that gives me pause is the case back seahorse. The 2846 got a relief cast seahorse around 1958 or so. This one is early and rather more basic and is a little surprising. That said it’s prob fine.
I like it.
The dial on yours looks fine to me and is clearly mottled but in an attractive way. Indeed the only thing here that gives me pause is the case back seahorse. The 2846 got a relief cast seahorse around 1958 or so. This one is early and rather more basic and is a little surprising. That said it’s prob fine.
I like it.
- Posts
- 90
- Likes
- 352
jffoo
·Fair enough. I don’t know this model specifically but I know the similar 2846 and 2848 models well. This is presumably the certified version of the 2846.
The dial on yours looks fine to me and is clearly mottled but in an attractive way. Indeed the only thing here that gives me pause is the case back seahorse. The 2846 got a relief cast seahorse around 1958 or so. This one is early and rather more basic and is a little surprising. That said it’s prob fine.
I like it.
- Posts
- 912
- Likes
- 1,255
theluckyluke
·Hello - there are a couple of threads on ref. 2920 (cal. 505) on OF. That could be a good place to start to compare watches side by side.
I have never handled this ref, but the fonts look clean. The dial seems to have a similar style to other examples published here. One thing that triggers a question for me is the gap between the border of the dial and the case and if that's expected (perhaps linked to jumbo references?)
I have never handled this ref, but the fonts look clean. The dial seems to have a similar style to other examples published here. One thing that triggers a question for me is the gap between the border of the dial and the case and if that's expected (perhaps linked to jumbo references?)
- Posts
- 278
- Likes
- 1,624
Wizzar
·Fair enough. I don’t know this model specifically but I know the similar 2846 and 2848 models well. This is presumably the certified version of the 2846.
The dial on yours looks fine to me and is clearly mottled but in an attractive way. Indeed the only thing here that gives me pause is the case back seahorse. The 2846 got a relief cast seahorse around 1958 or so. This one is early and rather more basic and is a little surprising. That said it’s prob fine.
I like it.
- Posts
- 7,164
- Likes
- 57,858
noelekal
··Home For Wayward WatchesLooks right as rain to me. A crystal polish and you'd be there!
