- Posts
- 3
- Likes
- 0
INFO Omega Seamaster 32mm (1958-1960s)
- Posts
- 7,954
- Likes
- 36,071
cristos71
·It's a very over-polished and re-dialed gold top watch, I read it as a ref 2828, from the late1950's with a wrong crown and possibly wrong hand set too. As for value, maybe $150 if you can find someone to buy it?
https://www.omegawatches.com/watch-omega-seamaster-omega-ck-2828
https://www.omegawatches.com/watch-omega-seamaster-omega-ck-2828
- Posts
- 3
- Likes
- 0
ColomboG
·thank you very much but I don't think it's that .. Very different
It's a very over-polished and re-dialed gold top watch, I read it as a ref 2828, from the late1950's with a wrong crown and possibly wrong hand set too. As for value, maybe $150 if you can find someone to buy it?
https://www.omegawatches.com/watch-omega-seamaster-omega-ck-2828
- Posts
- 10,519
- Likes
- 16,433
padders
··Oooo subtitles!It’s different to the online pics you see because it has been redialled. And not very well.
It is a 2828, follow the link above posted by Christos for details. Your date estimate is about right, I’d put it at 1959 based on the serial number. It’s a mid size model so small even for an era where watches were smaller, the full size fat lug Seamasters were 35mm wide. It’s not massively desirable unfortunately and I concur with the estimate above, I guess it might make $200 if running to an unsuspecting buyer. If you are looking to sell it I suggest eBay, it won’t get much interest here.
It is a 2828, follow the link above posted by Christos for details. Your date estimate is about right, I’d put it at 1959 based on the serial number. It’s a mid size model so small even for an era where watches were smaller, the full size fat lug Seamasters were 35mm wide. It’s not massively desirable unfortunately and I concur with the estimate above, I guess it might make $200 if running to an unsuspecting buyer. If you are looking to sell it I suggest eBay, it won’t get much interest here.
Edited:
- Posts
- 3
- Likes
- 0
ColomboG
·ok I understand. thank you very much everyone
It’s different to the online pics you see because it has been redialled. And not very well.
It is a 2828, follow the link above posted by Christos for details. Your date estimate is about right, I’d put it at 1959 based on the serial number. It’s a mid size model so small even for an era where watches were smaller, the full size fat lug Seamasters were 35mm wide. It’s not massively desirable unfortunately and I concur with the estimate above, I guess it might make $200 if running to an unsuspecting buyer. If you are looking to sell it I suggest eBay, it won’t get much interest here.
Similar threads
- Posts
- 5
- Views
- 206
- Posts
- 14
- Views
- 566
- Posts
- 17
- Views
- 623
- Posts
- 16
- Views
- 405
