Info needed on vintage speedmaster

L

Posts

2

Likes

1

lusmic

·Mar 5, 2024

Hello, check out the watch I found in this forum

Edited: Mar 6, 2024

 

Posts

4,816

Likes

12,195

wagudc

·Mar 5, 2024

Hi and welcome. It is the reference number: 145.022. The -69 tells you it was made approximately 1969-1971. ST means it is a steel case, as opposed to gold. See https://speedmaster101.com/145-022_update/ for more info.

 

Posts

18,202

Likes

27,530

Foo2rama

·Mar 5, 2024·Nowhere near as grumpy as he used to be...

Can’t give value without a picture of the front lol.

 

L

Posts

2

Likes

1

lusmic

·Mar 5, 2024

wagudc

Hi and welcome. It is the reference number: 145.022. The -69 tells you it was made approximately 1969-1971. ST means it is a steel case, as opposed to gold. See https://speedmaster101.com/145-022_update/ for more info.

Thanks for the info, I dont suppose there is any chance that this watch has the 321 movement that ive been reading about online? Would you need the serial number to find that out?

 

Posts

3,019

Likes

6,436

SOG53

·Mar 6, 2024

Show us photos front back sides why ask questions without showing us the watch🤨

 

Posts

1,175

Likes

2,461

Nepomuceño

·Mar 6, 2024

This watch has been flagged by @OneTwo as a scam. Refer here:

 

Posts

13,201

Likes

22,957

Davidt

·Mar 6, 2024

It’s a -69 straight writing model, with 861 movement and 1175 bracelet.

 

Posts

10,442

Likes

16,324

padders

·Mar 6, 2024·Oooo subtitles!

Nice that he has binned the photos now it has been identified as dodgy. I wonder if the OP is the scammer?

 

Posts

130

Likes

140

pitbos

·Mar 6, 2024

So much sketchiness accompanying one watch - popped up 3 times, each situation more dodgy than the next. All members should know to stay away from this watch - maybe the photos can be pinned/stickied?

 

Posts

219

Likes

209

Gabguzro

·Mar 6, 2024

The mysterious watch attacks again!

 

Posts

939

Likes

3,881

OneTwo

·Mar 7, 2024

Nepomuceño

This watch has been flagged by @OneTwo as a scam. Refer here:

I missed this thread so thanks for flagging it here @Nepomuceño!! I'm at least happy to see that sharing my story helped potentially spare others.

padders

Nice that he has binned the photos now it has been identified as dodgy.

I could have sworn that I’ve previously seen on a separate thread where admin members be able grab the photos from the back end of the site and post in a separate post. @dsio @gatorcpa @kyle L any chance that is possible?

 

Posts

34,267

Likes

38,886

dsio

·Mar 7, 2024·Ash @ ΩF

OneTwo

I missed this thread so thanks for flagging it here @Nepomuceño!! I'm at least happy to see that sharing my story helped potentially spare others.


I could have sworn that I’ve previously seen on a separate thread where admin members be able grab the photos from the back end of the site and post in a separate post. @dsio @gatorcpa @kyle L any chance that is possible?

It’s not that easy to recover the images

 

Posts

939

Likes

3,881

OneTwo

·Mar 7, 2024

dsio

It’s not that easy to recover the images

My mistake, I had thought it was a possibility but appreciate the reply!