- Posts
- 177
- Likes
- 169
dpwaber
·Visiting friends.
Edit: Have another.
Edit: Have another.
Edited:
Images that lift your spirits
- Posts
- 728
- Likes
- 1,719
Fretworker
·
Great, thank ypu
- Posts
- 26
- Likes
- 143
Raaanch
·
- Posts
- 17,419
- Likes
- 164,768
Alpha
·Images and sounds this evening whilst watching the 'Diamond Jubilee Concert'
In my humble opinion absolutely amazing 👍
Hopefully others enjoyed ?
In my humble opinion absolutely amazing 👍
Hopefully others enjoyed ?
- Posts
- 106
- Likes
- 376
Horoticus
·Cheese balls on the beach + Queen's jubilee images and sounds. I'm not quite sure how to process, but I like both. 😀
- Posts
- 8,257
- Likes
- 29,173
Tony C.
··Ωf Jury memberAva Gardner taking a selfie ~75 years ago!
- Posts
- 2,586
- Likes
- 3,873
Pvt-Public
·
- Posts
- 4,718
- Likes
- 17,862
Omegafanman
·Judging by the fact that the flash is not going off, and the reflection in the window behind her, I think some took a picture of her holding a camera. Just my 2 cents.
Yes but unusual the Grayflex is mounted on the left of the camera - most images show them on the right. Also is it connected to the camera / has it been used, why the long connection lead. Somone who knows the kit / the full photo shoot set could probably tell a story. Great picture either way and if she had been in star wars, she already knew how to grip a light saber :0)
- Posts
- 8,257
- Likes
- 29,173
Tony C.
··Ωf Jury memberJudging by the fact that the flash is not going off, and the reflection in the window behind her, I think some took a picture of her holding a camera. Just my 2 cents.
Isn't it possible that the light in the (rear) mirror was static, and employed to illuminate Gardner, and that the flash on her camera was not actively used?
- Posts
- 2,586
- Likes
- 3,873
Pvt-Public
·Isn't it possible that the light in the (rear) mirror was static, and employed to illuminate Gardner, and that the flash on her camera was not actively used?
- Posts
- 8,257
- Likes
- 29,173
Tony C.
··Ωf Jury memberSo it may have been a “mirror” selfie
I assumed that, and the light seen was used to illuminate her, so no need for a flash.
- Posts
- 4,718
- Likes
- 17,862
- Posts
- 4,718
- Likes
- 17,862
Omegafanman
·Could be a wedding ring / jewellery match on the left hand...although she was divorced in 46 and this looks a bit later (but before 51 when she married again). As an aside was was it about Mickey Rooney !!!!
Edited:
- Posts
- 728
- Likes
- 1,719
- Posts
- 728
- Likes
- 1,719
Fretworker
·Once would have been enough!
- Posts
- 728
- Likes
- 1,719
Fretworker
·Meant a lot to me. Him and the other three
- Posts
- 728
- Likes
- 1,719
Fretworker
·Isn't it possible that the light in the (rear) mirror was static, and employed to illuminate Gardner, and that the flash on her camera was not actively used?
Maybe. But wouldn't her shadow have been thrown in front of her?
- Posts
- 8,257
- Likes
- 29,173
Tony C.
··Ωf Jury memberMaybe. But wouldn't her shadow have been thrown in front of her?
No. The light was in front of her, and offset (as she was shooting into a mirror). The rear mirror shows the reflection of the light, and the shadow would make sense.
- Posts
- 728
- Likes
- 1,719
Fretworker
·The Romans left this in Corbridge. Some time back though
- Posts
- 728
- Likes
- 1,719
Fretworker
·No. The light was in front of her, and offset (as she was shooting into a mirror). The rear mirror shows the reflection of the light, and the shadow would make sense.
Thank you. I see it now
