ID Watch - is this a 165.024?

Posts
12,103
Likes
21,006
Coming back to this - Is the fact that hands are and dial are service replacements a big impact on the value? The watch maker did tell me it is an original authentic omega... is it a negligible difference? (10-20%?) or a massive difference (50-60%?)

Id say around 35%
 
Posts
5,636
Likes
5,793
My WatchCo wore an Omega shark mesh but it just wasn't right for me. Nowadays wears the Apollo 11 50th bracelet and looks fabulous and I''m happy it's all Omega even if it is all modern parts, except the movement.
 
Posts
4,593
Likes
10,795
A thread on a similar question, might be worth a read. My 165.0324 likes either simple leather or an Uncle Seiko flat link. Would like an omega shark mesh but it’s finding one.



https://omegaforums.net/threads/bracelet-for-166-024-seamaster-300.127850/

I'm liking that flat link. Is that the same head link size for the Speedmaster? My wife's Speedmaster has an 1171 bracelet and I can't remove enough links to get a good fit for her slender wrist.

Sorry for the slight thread drift 😁
 
Posts
39
Likes
13
yes it would be great to find an original bracelet. I wonder what happened to the original one (of mine!) but original bracelets I saw are very expensive!
 
Posts
39
Likes
13
Hi Big



Thanks you for that!

I think most of the things seem to check out when looking at the website but I'll have it serviced and have it looked it to ensure it's original. Good spot on the dial! It is indeed missing the T-T between swiss made

You're right on the crown, it does indeed have an omega logo (difficult to photoghraph). It seems to be protruding but if pulled it comes all the way out. It measures from start to end at around 1.5-1.7cms. I cannot seem to change the time on the watch so it definitely needs fixing. It will stop if not worn and if i move it it starts up again, but I think that's normal. The watch generally seems to have oxidisation or just general grime as I think it was sitting in a draw for ages as my dad didn't use it. And I noted the strap also not being the original either so thanks for confirming that!.

Could it be the crown is protruding because it might need a good clean? See pics and thanks for your help!


Finally got it back

The watch maker said the movement is all original and keep time beautifully, around 2-3 second variance. Here is the finished product! Crown is sorted and water pressure tested!
 
Posts
566
Likes
1,177
I'm liking that flat link. Is that the same head link size for the Speedmaster? My wife's Speedmaster has an 1171 bracelet and I can't remove enough links to get a good fit for her slender wrist.

Sorry for the slight thread drift 😁
Not sure what you mean (head link size)? DM me if you wish and I can measure.
 
Posts
4,593
Likes
10,795
Not sure what you mean (head link size)? DM me if you wish and I can measure.

Ah sorry I should have said lug width. My bad 👍
 
Posts
260
Likes
189
@asdrubalex I`d also look for new crown, as the one fitted to the watch is not model correct...
Does the watchmaker gave you the serial number of your movement?
 
Posts
39
Likes
13
@asdrubalex I`d also look for new crown, as the one fitted to the watch is not model correct...
Does the watchmaker gave you the serial number of your movement?
he said it checked out.... they even did water proofing on it.

He said it was a 165.024 / 552 caliber - is that what i need? or is there another number?
 
Posts
260
Likes
189
The watch may be waterproof, but it doesn`t mean the crow is correct for this model 😀 It just fits the case tube and stem diameter.
Serial number is stamped on a train wheel bridge, 8 digits, I`d bet in your watch starting with 24mil..
 
Posts
613
Likes
629
he said it checked out.... they even did water proofing on it.

Do you know if they tested it, or if they simply replaced/greased the gaskets? I would be a little cautious if you don't.

That looks like a Speedmaster MkII crown.
 
Posts
260
Likes
189
MkII Speedmaster is cal861 = TAP9 stem= wont fit cal552=TAP10.
But generaly agree, something conteporary correct...
 
Posts
39
Likes
13
The watch may be waterproof, but it doesn`t mean the crow is correct for this model 😀 It just fits the case tube and stem diameter.
Serial number is stamped on a train wheel bridge, 8 digits, I`d bet in your watch starting with 24mil..
yes, serial number is 25986944!
 
Posts
260
Likes
189
Sorry, 2598xxxx is not usual range for SM 300... putting the movement to beginning of 1968, should be CB case and B4 dial, yours is B3....seems more and more as a franken watch to me...nothing fits...
 
Posts
208
Likes
80
Sorry, 2598xxxx is not usual range for SM 300... putting the movement to beginning of 1968,

Production of the Seamaster 300 ended circa late 1970. I'm not saying your are wrong, just pointing out that a movement serial of 1968 could fall within the 1963-1970 range of the production period...
 
Posts
12,103
Likes
21,006
Sorry, 2598xxxx is not usual range for SM 300... putting the movement to beginning of 1968, should be CB case and B4 dial, yours is B3....seems more and more as a franken watch to me...nothing fits...

Are you saying the 25m serials are too late or more specifically that 2596xxxx is outside of the known clusters of sm300 serials?
 
Posts
208
Likes
80
Are you saying the 25m serials are too late or more specifically that 2596xxxx is outside of the known clusters of sm300 serials?

25m serial movement is within the cluster of known SM300 serials.