I don't understand the recent Rolex SS craze/shortage. What am I missing?

Posts
1,456
Likes
2,793
Meanwhile, as another mentioned just above, while AD cases are empty, Chrono 24 is PACKED FULL of Rolex. And, I assume that for every 1 on Chrono 24, there are at least a handful more in safes “to appreciate,” in other sales platforms (eg IG), etc.
This is something I'm struggling to understand. If ADs and Rolex boutiques are empty and yet sites like Chrono24 are full of SS Rolex watches, then something very dodgy must be going on. Surely not everone who gets a new SS Rolex at retail is an opportunistic flipper?
 
Posts
131
Likes
108
Rolex is no longer selling its most popular models, but still manages to keep outselling its next closest competitor’s entire catalogue by an order of magnitude, and growing the gap each year.

my thinking is coming round to the notion that maybe Rolex’s has shifted its production to a more global offering. If they are indeed making the same number of watches, with the growth in China and India that must have occurred, then it would be sensible to assume that an awful lot more watches are being shipped to these regions. This would lead to a dearth in stock in more traditional markets (uk, us etc). And it’s also very plausible that the most popular models in these newer markets are in fact not SS models (a valid point I think you made before). Maybe a UK based customer who wants to buy a Submariner isn’t necessarily Rolex’s highest priority, or at least not as important as they once were.
 
Posts
16,743
Likes
47,368
my thinking is coming round to the notion that maybe Rolex’s has shifted its production to a more global offering. If they are indeed making the same number of watches, with the growth in China and India that must have occurred, then it would be sensible to assume that an awful lot more watches are being shipped to these regions. This would lead to a dearth in stock in more traditional markets (uk, us etc). And it’s also very plausible that the most popular models in these newer markets are in fact not SS models (a valid point I think you made before). Maybe a UK based customer who wants to buy a Submariner isn’t necessarily Rolex’s highest priority, or at least not as important as they once were.

or

As I have said years ago before you got here. Several years ago Rolex got caught holding the bag with a lot of Datejusts (not just a lot I mean a couple hundred thousand ) when China banned giving gifts of expensive watches and they are making people buy up all of these before they get what they want being a SS model. ( which aren’t the biggest sellers in China )
Why else would they want people to buy 3 datejusts to get a Sub or GMT...
 
Posts
131
Likes
108
or

As I have said years ago before you got here. Several years ago Rolex got caught holding the bag with a lot of Datejusts (not just a lot I mean a couple hundred thousand ) when China banned giving gifts of expensive watches and they are making people buy up all of these before they get what they want being a SS model. ( which aren’t the biggest sellers in China )
Why else would they want people to buy 3 datejusts to get a Sub or GMT...
Genuinely interested in this as I don’t know about it, when did this happen? But also if this did occur wouldn’t you give them some credit for avoiding the mistakes of the past all over again by limiting production so that every watch now sells?
 
Posts
16,743
Likes
47,368
Genuinely interested in this as I don’t know about it, when did this happen? But also if this did occur wouldn’t you give them some credit for avoiding the mistakes of the past all over again by limiting production so that every watch now sells?

Well this is years ago but relevant as it is when SS models started drying up.



A Chinese government crackdown on lavish spending by officials has pushed expensive liquor and high-end watches out of favour in the luxury gift-giving market, a survey from the Hurun Report, known for its annual China Rich List, showed on Tuesday.

Top alcohol maker Kweichow Moutai Co Ltd saw its clear ‘baijiu’ liquor -- widely imbibed at official banquets and presented as a premium gift -- fall to 13th place on the “best brand for gifting by men” table, down from fifth last year when there was a single, mixed-gender table, according to the report.

Swiss watchmaker Longines was the only watch brand to make the “gifting by men” list at number 15, replacing Rolex, which was ninth in 2012 but dropped off the list altogether this year. The report surveyed 551 Chinese with personal wealth of 10 million yuan ($1.6 million) or more.

The results follow a government crackdown, launched in March last year, on using public funds to buy luxury items such as baijiu, which can cost several thousand yuan per bottle. In December, alcohol was banned at military events.

“Watches and liquor have been influenced by government policies and have been pulled down by a change in leadership. It’s traditionally been that in government there are people who can influence policy in your favour,” Hurun founder Rupert Hoogewerf told Reuters.

State media have reported a wave of corruption and abuse-of-power cases since November’s senior leadership transition in the ruling Communist Party. In one case, an official was sacked after Internet photos showed him wearing a number of different luxury-brand watches.

The official Xinhua News Agency reported in late December that the luxury ban on officials had hit the share prices of listed liquor distillers.

Market leader Moutai had 12.5 billion yuan wiped off its market value after the new regulations were announced.

Moutai’s fall meant there was not a single Chinese brand in the top 10, and only one in the top 15 on the men’s gift list.

France dominated with six brands out of the top 10 in the men’s list and four in the women’s, including luxury accessory and apparel makers Louis Vuitton and Chanel.

However, less expensive gifts were the order of the day.

“With the current anti-corruption drive, officials can no longer receive blatantly expensive products, so we’re seeing a trend towards less-expensive giving,” said Hoogewerf. (Editing by John Ruwitch)
 
Posts
131
Likes
108
Interesting, but we have to assume that if there was a datejust mountain it’s long been depleted by now. I’m not pretending to know why the average customer can’t buy a sub, I range between Rolex being evil geniuses to a sensible well run company.
 
Posts
16,743
Likes
47,368
Interesting, but we have to assume that if there was a datejust mountain it’s long been depleted by now. I’m not pretending to know why the average customer can’t buy a sub, I range between Rolex being evil geniuses to a sensible well run company.

Mountain ran out then COVID hit and economy is not what it used to be. I can tell you no one in India is buying Rolex watches at the moment and China is not in super prosperous times of old.
That leaves the not a tremendous amount of watches being made for the last few years at least.
 
Posts
3,979
Likes
8,988
Maybe a UK based customer who wants to buy a Submariner isn’t necessarily Rolex’s highest priority, or at least not as important as they once were.

looking at the analysts’ 2020 estimate of ~800K units sold for a retail value of ~8B CHF, it suggests an average retail value of ~11K U.S./unit.

I’d have guessed that if selling a large/disproportionate number of TT and other precious models that average would be higher. 👎
That said, I’ve got only a very vague grasp on the range of MSRP for Rolex.

And. there’s a deeper question of profit spread between SS and TT/precious: data from the Swiss Fed of Horo suggests that while TT/Precious are only, like, 10% of sales they’re something like 30-40% of profits (relying on memory only here) - so MSRP/Unit obscures the likely more important appetite of brands: selling just one TT/precious may give as much profit as selling a handful of SS.
 
Posts
10
Likes
3
Wow. Lots of theories flying around.
There are a few points that may have been lost in these 40+ pages.
1) Rolex is not a publicly traded company, it is a non-profit organization controlled by H.W. Foundation. So share holder pressure is non-existent and "profit" isn't the number one priority
2) The bottleneck in manufacturing may be the COSC process, which may or may not be less of an issue since Omega's large departure from this movement certification process
3) Desire and demand are not parameters that can easily be measured, especially by those in investment arena
4) Comparing the Snoopy and or Caliber 321 production to Rolex SS Subs is just ridiculous, the numbers aren't even close
5) Seeing less Rolex SS Subs in airport boutiques makes complete sense if you step back and look at what Rolex wants to achieve, which is not a customer buying a highly desirable watch and flying back home, but rather "relationships" between their AD's and customers
6) AD numbers have been cut over the past ten years and the next AD's to be cut often see shrinking numbers of watches being sent to them. In other words,"I stopped by my local AD and they told me they are getting less watches than in years past..." means they will probably not be AD's much longer
7) Do not forget that empty AD displays does not mean that previous orders are not be filled out and that almost any desirable Rolex never makes it to the display case. This does not signal throttled production
8) The Rolex catalog is pretty large and there are many variations
9) Deposits on Rolex watches is a store policy, not Rolex
10) I actually think that it is wonderful that Rolex doesn't increase their prices on SS Subs or Daytonas just because the secondary market is so hot. In addition, I would also commend them for not ceasing production of any desirable watch like Patek with the 5711-1A

I am a collector and appreciate many watch companies. Over the years I have probably owned almost all of there "grail" pieces in most WIS's heads but looking at my collection today, it is 80% Rolex.
For those of you who are into cars, it is much like my car journey with Porsche. Many dream to buy a Porsche and many go on to then buy other sports cars. After years of trying different cars, many return to Porsche. Why? Because they are wonderful automobiles and just work so well.
To me, this is what Rolex is in the watch world. Again, people will hate and say that they are horrible timepieces. To that I will say that none of my almost 40 Rolex timepieces have needed anything beyond routine maintenance. Something that I can not say about my Patek, AP, F.P. Journe or IWC. My ALS and VC timepieces have also been fantastic but those are at a much higher price point and worn much less often.

Regardless, whether or not we know what the issues are, the one thing that can not be denied is that the demand for Rolex is huge and people are willing to pay for Rolex. (Also for Porsche, try buying a TurboS or GT3)

Just wear what you want and like, if that means paying up for something, so be it. In this time of ridiculously low interest rates, people who have not been able to vacation or eat out and the possible fear that we may die due to Covid, there are a lot of people with money who are really saying that you only live once. These YOLO believers will pay whatever the market asks.

Like many things in life, you can either play the game or sit on the sidelines saying the game is rigged. I thought a friend who bought a new white dial SS Daytona for $18K was nuts (I paid retail $12.4K shortly after release). He still asks me if he was nuts...

Hiro
 
Posts
27,685
Likes
70,364
2) The bottleneck in manufacturing may be the COSC process, which may or may not be less of an issue since Omega's large departure from this movement certification process


Hiro

Omega till uses COSC...all METAS watches still go through COSC...

Cheers, Al
 
Posts
10
Likes
3
Thank you for that clarification Al, in which case the bottleneck is even worse...
 
Posts
1,456
Likes
2,793
Regardless, whether or not we know what the issues are, the one thing that can not be denied is that the demand for Rolex is huge and people are willing to pay for Rolex. (Also for Porsche, try buying a TurboS or GT3)

Hiro
Although I like your car analogy (using Porsche as an example), I have to say that it doesn't quite stack up. For starters, I'm willing to bet that I wouldn't be forced to buy a Cayman or Cayenne from my local dealer just to get on the wait list for a GT3. If I rocked up there with a suitcase full of cash and wanted a Porsche, they'd happily take a deposit and I'd get my hands on one in a timely fashion. Maybe no more than 6-12 month wait depending on the model (GT3 may be longer?). I also wouldn't have to pay ridiculous prices for a used one on the secondary market.

Like many on this forum, I'd love to add a Rolex to my collection as I've heard what great watches they are and want to see it for myself. For me, being an aviation enthusiast, the GMT2 really speaks to me. However, I just don't have the time or the inclination to play silly games and have a "relationship" with an AD/Boutique just to get one and I'm sure many here feel the same. If it means that I miss out on a watch for now, then so be it. I'll be patient and bide my time.
 
Posts
27,685
Likes
70,364
Thank you for that clarification Al, in which case the bottleneck is even worse...

Not sure why you would think COSC is a bottleneck, in particular with production down in 2020. They don’t publish numbers anymore, so did you get information that this is actually happening, or is this just your theory?
 
Posts
10
Likes
3
Although I like your car analogy (using Porsche as an example), I have to say that it doesn't quite stack up. For starters, I'm willing to bet that I wouldn't be forced to buy a Cayman or Cayenne from my local dealer just to get on the wait list for a GT3. If I rocked up there with a suitcase full of cash and wanted a Porsche, they'd happily take a deposit and I'd get my hands on one in a timely fashion. Maybe no more than 6-12 month wait depending on the model (GT3 may be longer?). I also wouldn't have to pay ridiculous prices for a used one on the secondary market.

Like many on this forum, I'd love to add a Rolex to my collection as I've heard what great watches they are and want to see it for myself. For me, being an aviation enthusiast, the GMT2 really speaks to me. However, I just don't have the time or the inclination to play silly games and have a "relationship" with an AD/Boutique just to get one and I'm sure many here feel the same. If it means that I miss out on a watch for now, then so be it. I'll be patient and bide my time.

Actually, my analogy is more than stacks up. Do you know what the market is with Porsche GT cars?
Even if you went to one with a briefcase full of cash, which by the way is completely counterproductive as the dealership makes more money if you finance, you will never get a GT3. You can pay $30K over sticker and maybe they will let you buy a dealer spec’ed car.
So, if you would like to buy a GT3 at sticker price then say hello to buying a Cayenne, a Macan Turbo and maybe a Taycan. Then maybe they will offer a build 18 months from now. Yes, buying a Cayman will not get you a place in line.
Now where my analogy falls apart is that a Porsche dealer is allowed to place an ADM (Adjusted Dealer Markup) on the vehicle whereas Rolex forbids AD’s from marking up new watches.
And as far as the secondary market analogy, look at the price of my 2019 GT3 Touring. Even with 5K mikes on the odometer I have been offered $30K more than I paid new two years ago.
Does it stink for people who want to get their first GT3? Yes. Although if you are an owner, you now appreciate the car even more because in reality having an appreciating modern vehicle is a true unicorn.
 
Posts
10
Likes
3
Not sure why you would think COSC is a bottleneck, in particular with production down in 2020. They don’t publish numbers anymore, so did you get information that this is actually happening, or is this just your theory?

I do not have any “numbers” but common sense would tell most people that in addition to the Rolex factory shutting down, having the COSC not certifying watches during a two or three month period would cause a production bottleneck in addition to the usual supply chain issues.
But Al, really, does it even matter?
People just love to argue when they have too much time on their hands.
What is it that you are trying to prove? Or disprove?
 
Posts
1,456
Likes
2,793
Actually, my analogy is more than stacks up. Do you know what the market is with Porsche GT cars?
Even if you went to one with a briefcase full of cash, which by the way is completely counterproductive as the dealership makes more money if you finance, you will never get a GT3. You can pay $30K over sticker and maybe they will let you buy a dealer spec’ed car.
So, if you would like to buy a GT3 at sticker price then say hello to buying a Cayenne, a Macan Turbo and maybe a Taycan. Then maybe they will offer a build 18 months from now. Yes, buying a Cayman will not get you a place in line.
Now where my analogy falls apart is that a Porsche dealer is allowed to place an ADM (Adjusted Dealer Markup) on the vehicle whereas Rolex forbids AD’s from marking up new watches.
And as far as the secondary market analogy, look at the price of my 2019 GT3 Touring. Even with 5K mikes on the odometer I have been offered $30K more than I paid new two years ago.
Does it stink for people who want to get their first GT3? Yes. Although if you are an owner, you now appreciate the car even more because in reality having an appreciating modern vehicle is a true unicorn.
Please read my post a bit more closely. I said I'd rock up with a suitcase full of cash to buy a "Porsche", not specifically a GT3.
Yes, I'd agree that the GT3 is something special. But the other Porsches are as you say, "dealer specced" and mass produced. So I shouldn't have to jump through hoops or buy a car I didn't really want just to get a mass produced car that I do want. Similarly the Sub, GMT2, Daytona, Explorers etc are mass produced watches. They are not limited editions or made in small numbers like a GT3. If they're mass produced, then I really can't understand why is there so much hype and are they really that good to justify all the trouble getting one? Then again as another poster mentioned earlier in this thread buying a car or a watch is a highly emotive exercise and when emotions are involved, all logic can go out the window.
 
Posts
3,979
Likes
8,988
For starters, I'm willing to bet that I wouldn't be forced to buy a Cayman or Cayenne from my local dealer just to get on the wait list for a GT3.

I don’t know about Porsche, but with Ferrari and similar brands of high end cars, you must absolutely purchase “standard” vehicles to get considered for the “hot” vehicles.

And then you must purchase several of the “hot” vehicles to be considered for the limited edition type vehicles.

This type of structure is longstanding and widespread in the luxury market
 
Posts
1,456
Likes
2,793
I don’t know about Porsche, but with Ferrari and similar brands of high end cars, you must absolutely purchase “standard” vehicles to get considered for the “hot” vehicles.

And then you must purchase several of the “hot” vehicles to be considered for the limited edition type vehicles.

This type of structure is longstanding and widespread in the luxury market
Thanks for clarifying.
 
Posts
10
Likes
3
Please read my post a bit more closely. I said I'd rock up with a suitcase full of cash to buy a "Porsche", not specifically a GT3.
Yes, I'd agree that the GT3 is something special. But the other Porsches are as you say, "dealer specced" and mass produced. So I shouldn't have to jump through hoops or buy a car I didn't really want just to get a mass produced car that I do want. Similarly the Sub, GMT2, Daytona, Explorers etc are mass produced watches. They are not limited editions or made in small numbers like a GT3. If they're mass produced, then I really can't understand why is there so much hype and are they really that good to justify all the trouble getting one? Then again as another poster mentioned earlier in this thread buying a car or a watch is a highly emotive exercise and when emotions are involved, all logic can go out the window.
Oh no. I read your reply correctly. I don’t want to assume anything but your response means that you do not understand the current situation.
Even with your small suitcase full of cash (usually $5K is the deposit for Porsche), I honestly do not see any dealer taking your deposit because without a car buying history, you will never get on the list.
A GT3 is not the most expensive Porsche, as are SS Subs, GMTs, SDs or Daytonas in the Rolex line.
These are luxury items and are valued because of many factors. Desirability is only one factor.
The other factors being value retention and reliability in these examples of Porsche and Rolex. These two factors are very unique because most luxury cars and watches lose value over time, as well as having horrible reliability issues.
I am only one owner but I have been fortunate to actually owned each GT3 version since 2007. Those being the 997.1, 997.2, 991.1 and now the 991.2.
I am also lucky enough to own every SS version of the Daytona from the A series Zenith to the current 116500 in black and white, as well as the SS subs from 1680 to the current 216610. Plus several versions Exp II’s, Exp I’s and SD’s.
Both the cars and the watches have retained their values better than almost all other watches and cars I have owned. Yes, there are a few outliers like my Patek 5711-1A or AP 15302ST but most watches and cars depreciate, Rolex SS models seem to buck this trend.
Do not be naive to think that this fact alone doesn’t make people want them even more.
 
Posts
1,046
Likes
5,432
Now, who's got my copy of the DSM-5... just need a quick ref.