I don't understand the recent Rolex SS craze/shortage. What am I missing?

Posts
133
Likes
63
I’ve not seen any new ones near me for over a decade. Interesting theory but I don’t believe it,
I’m from a small country and we have like 5 ADs ? Recently 2 lost their dealerships so that’s pretty sizeable!

maybe it’s Rolex just punishing those ADs that sell to the grey markets .. but then again blame it on those ADs who get caught ..

I don’t understand this craze too. If this brand doesn’t want my money I’ll take it somewhere else to another brand who does!
 
Posts
17,701
Likes
26,823
I’m from a small country and we have like 5 ADs ? Recently 2 lost their dealerships so that’s pretty sizeable!

maybe it’s Rolex just punishing those ADs that sell to the grey markets .. but then again blame it on those ADs who get caught ..

I don’t understand this craze too. If this brand doesn’t want my money I’ll take it somewhere else to another brand who does!
Or they cannot move enough DJ's to make quota, remember AD's get alotments they have to sell.... Its not always what it seems...
 
Posts
27,801
Likes
70,614
If anything the number of AD’s appears to be shrinking, rather than growing...
 
Posts
4,593
Likes
10,794
Very interesting analysis. I do wonder about who fills this large gap in the market. I can't see it being Tudor,

I dunno it could very well be rolex intended Tudor to fill at least some of this gap? I agree Omega is and rightfully so. Tudor does seem to have some real nice offerings since it's revamp of model line a few years ago.
 
Posts
2,026
Likes
7,157
There is no denying that many factors are at play. May be the number of ADs. May be decreased production. May be increased demand. May be exposure of the brand to more people through all the blogs and social media. And what else? Possibly many many more facets of this situation.

But for one, I am absolutely convinced that more people have been hoarding that many more Rolex units in their collection than in the past. Look at our forums and see how many people are now trying to get all SS references, even if they barely have any time to wear them. Why? Prestige. Liquid (but seemingly safe) asset. Veblen good. Etc etc.
I think this has really been a perfect storm for SS models in general.

Whether this is only a bubble that will eventually burst if and when people move on to the next big thing (whether it be yellow gold, two tone, pocket watches again, or any other “trend”), it is anybody’s guess.
 
Posts
16,307
Likes
44,926
The Wikipedia entry will read- Montres Rolex S.A. 1920-2024
Rolex was a watch brand making upper mid-tier mass production tool, sport and dress watches and was known as an aspirational luxury brand during the 20th century. After a series of poor business decisions, they were bought out by Swatch Group in 2024 and relegated to their mid-tier line along with Hamilton and Tissot.
 
Posts
6,997
Likes
13,071
The Wikipedia entry will read- Montres Rolex S.A. 1920-2024
Rolex was a watch brand making upper mid-tier mass production tool, sport and dress watches and was known as an aspirational luxury brand during the 20th century. After a series of poor business decisions, they were bought out by Swatch Group in 2024 and relegated to their mid-tier line along with Hamilton and Tissot.
It's only a little over six weeks until April 1st, repost this then for a good laugh.
 
Posts
111
Likes
607
I think these grey cloud reading, apocalyptically colored statements have been part of Rolex history for decades now. Hmmm...
Edited:
 
Posts
169
Likes
175
The Wikipedia entry will read- Montres Rolex S.A. 1920-2024
Rolex was a watch brand making upper mid-tier mass production tool, sport and dress watches and was known as an aspirational luxury brand during the 20th century. After a series of poor business decisions, they were bought out by Swatch Group in 2024 and relegated to their mid-tier line along with Hamilton and Tissot.

I don't think this is going to happen, but the thought of Rolex rigging the system to increase the sales of their precious metal watches or "less desirable models" is fascinating. I got a little bit obsessed with gettin a SS submariner no date this year, but I took a step back recently and thought: "Am I just getting caught up in all the hype?" Even at retail, is this watch worth $8k? Is it really worth $3k more than my Seamaster? In my opinions, it's a beautiful piece and, yes, I would pay retail for one. But I certainly don't think it's worth the $10-12 price tag that grey dealers are charging.
 
Posts
6,832
Likes
13,793
Maybe they're making money out of licensing those AD's but it seems stupid to increase AD's without increasing distribution.

As frustrating as it is we keep getting emotionally confused here. Of course there are plenty of watches to buy and one doesn't have to "give" the money to Rolex. You really only have an issue if what you want is a Rolex. Then the shortage is really frustrating.

I don't love the RO, nor do I see it as such a game changer. And I like and respect Genta but that's not enought for me to fan out. Don't get me wrong it is a great watch, and I don't dislike it, but it is not on a short list for me and I don't think it's the best AP.

There are a lot of watches historically, horologically and trend-wise that equal or surpass Rolex....so if I buy thinking about buying the "best" instead of "What I want to buy" then Rolex is not the best choice....although it does maintain and gain value handsomely.

So:

Do you want to buy the best not matter what your taste drives you towards?

or

Do you want to buy what you want even if it is not the best?


This applies for the buyers that get frustrated and state "I don't have to give them my money, plenty of choices, if they don't want to sell more then I don't want to buy more. What this says to me is...I wanted it, can't get it...now I not only DON'T want it but it's not that good.....but if I could get it then it would be very good"

Conversely, If you manage to get a Rolex (paying a premium or not) it actually does not make the watch any better than it actually is. There will still be better watches aplenty to compare it to.

You want it, buy it. You don't, don't. But let's not change the value or lack thereof based on our emotional frustration.
 
Posts
17,701
Likes
26,823
There are a lot of watches historically, horologically and trend-wise that equal or surpass Rolex....so if I buy thinking about buying the "best" instead of "What I want to buy" then Rolex is not the best choice....although it does maintain and gain value handsomely.

Has Rolex ever been the best? Nope never.
Has Rolex been the best at a price point? I cannot think of a time in the last 30 years they have.
 
Posts
112
Likes
485
)
I don't think this is going to happen, but the thought of Rolex rigging the system to increase the sales of their precious metal watches or "less desirable models" is fascinating. I got a little bit obsessed with gettin a SS submariner no date this year, but I took a step back recently and thought: "Am I just getting caught up in all the hype?" Even at retail, is this watch worth $8k? Is it really worth $3k more than my Seamaster? In my opinions, it's a beautiful piece and, yes, I would pay retail for one. But I certainly don't think it's worth the $10-12 price tag that grey dealers are charging.
As a guy that owns 3 Rolex watches that I do love (though no sports models), I think you're correct, just not worth the coin. I didn't even own a dive watch and was reading some solid reviews on Steinhart and after a major addition of my home, wasn't really interested in spending $8k+ on a dive watch. I pulled the trigger on a Steinhart Ocean One 39mm. For $425 I'm totally enamored with this watch and have worn it every day for the 2+ weeks I've owned it. I know a homage watch isn't for everyone, but I'm thrilled with it. I'm glad I didn't bother getting on a list at an AD. I have always been unwilling to pay over MSRP for pretty much everything, so going grey was never a consideration for a Sub. Now, I figure I'm that much closer to getting the Speedmaster I want to add to my collection.😀
 
Posts
3,979
Likes
8,988
None of my posts re: "that watch" have been deleted, so I think that might not be accurate at this time, sir. It's not a fake either, lol, it's clearly labeled "Steinhart".

I didn’t really care to take a position, but instead was just reporting the facts - the sticky speaks for itself, and is a rational position RE the distinction between an “homage” and a “replica”/“fake.”

But if pressed, I tend to agree and it’s obvious to most that “homage” is marketing speak for “replica,” while “Steinhart” is just a funny way of spelling “Rolex Sub Replica”...
 
Posts
6,832
Likes
13,793
Has Rolex ever been the best? Nope never.
Has Rolex been the best at a price point? I cannot think of a time in the last 30 years they have.
I agree, but neither of those are my points. In fact I agree with you 100%.

that’s why I am saying, don’t buy it because it’s the best (it’s not) or stop buying it because it’s not.

you either like it, want it, or not.
It shouldn’t be that complicated or emotional
 
Posts
17,701
Likes
26,823
The Rolex stainless craze has been around for a long time. When I bought my first Daytona in the early 90s, SS was selling for more than gold/stainless and was always subject to wait list. (of course, for an extra grand you could always subvert the wait list, which I did) At the time it was a matter of paying 6k for a 5k retail watch. Now it must be more obscene.

Recently I sold a few things and decided to grab a vintage GMT, so I started educating myself again. Most of the prices were staggering, but what I found most stunning was that on Chrono24, there were 5500 GMTs for sale. Five thousand, five hundred watches. How can that not be considered a glut? How is that not an example that the supply is greater than demand? And that's just ONE source. Ebay is loaded with them, too. And I'm sure dozens of other sources have them stockpiled. What is driving prices upward in a market such as this? I honestly don't understand. I get the name, blah blah, stainless sport watches are in demand. That doesn't explain how 5500 watches sit for sale while prices stay steady or rise, instead of lowering to sell inventory I'm sure I am missing something here.

but only the Daytona was wait listed and it had nothing to do with Rolex back then. Due to the fact that Rolex was only given a limited number of the zenith movements to make the Daytona it highly limited their ability to make them.
 
Posts
1
Likes
0
From Sept 14th, page 13:
What ... do you really think there's anything substantial left to say about the availability of Rolex SS watches?

Now, if Rolex would only make available a new SS sports for each comment in this thread...

After they finally clear the apparent warehouses full of PM watches originally destined for China before the corruption crackdown, the test for Rolex mgmt will be whether they can reintroduce the SS models to the distribution channel gradually enough to avoid crashing the secondary market (which would also hurt the primary market if buyers no longer see a Rolex as a "safe buy" that will not lose value as soon as it leaves the store).
 
Posts
487
Likes
1,718
The Rolex stainless craze has been around for a long time. When I bought my first Daytona in the early 90s, SS was selling for more than gold/stainless and was always subject to wait list. (of course, for an extra grand you could always subvert the wait list, which I did) At the time it was a matter of paying 6k for a 5k retail watch. Now it must be more obscene.

Recently I sold a few things and decided to grab a vintage GMT, so I started educating myself again. Most of the prices were staggering, but what I found most stunning was that on Chrono24, there were 5500 GMTs for sale. Five thousand, five hundred watches. How can that not be considered a glut? How is that not an example that the supply is greater than demand? And that's just ONE source. Ebay is loaded with them, too. And I'm sure dozens of other sources have them stockpiled. What is driving prices upward in a market such as this? I honestly don't understand. I get the name, blah blah, stainless sport watches are in demand. That doesn't explain how 5500 watches sit for sale while prices stay steady or rise, instead of lowering to sell inventory I'm sure I am missing something here.
Like you I find it confounding. There’s obviously plenty of supply out there but the sellers are unrelenting in price.